In the moist dark of the Earth***,
ancient sacred powers rest and then pour forth.
The Mother lives there in a circle with the wise,
and all that is of earthly dark or wrong
bows before Shes which cannot themselves be tamed.
She lives and rules there, the true Mistress of the
Uncreated, the Formless,
from which the Son of Light Itself was/is born,
out of Intercourse with the Father, who
then gave Himself in seed to All,
so that each part has as its secret/sacred heart a piece
of Him and Her
This the very Stars sing in remembered Glory.
But still She seeks for unity, throughout Eternity - to be
folded once more in the Arms of Her Lover/Our Father,
bringing Peace to all just by Her presence.
That is the Promise ... that all the seeds -
all the Children - would once more come to rest
in the Holy Womb of the Mother,
wrapped about with the Arms of Grace of the Father,
holding and surrounding All, forever and ever and ever.
Amen
*** For a beautiful and
erudite commentary on the nature of Evil as
regards the Inner Spheres of the Earth, read
Stephen Clarke here.
For a profound discussion of Steiner's so-called
Mexican Mysteries, read
Stephen here.
Read my
response to Clarke5 here
introduction
The word “Mystery"
here means Sacred Rite of Transformation.
The Mystery of Evil then is another name for
the period of time (or Age) humanity now enters,
where the individual ~!~ human Being must confront
the true Beast from the Abyss of the
Unknown/Unknowable, which is/will at first appear
to mirror his/her own unredeemed and
unmastered nature. A raging private fairy
tale, the truths of ourselves. Masks
unmasked at all masques.
Having Choice, we determine - we become responsible for what is. If we give into the darker urges that is what will manifest. If we struggle for the light, that too will manifest. This Rite of Choice in the Modern Age of Life on the Earth is the Mystery of Evil - a sacred encounter, in the World Temple that is the Earth, in which that which is Above and that which is Below, as these appear in and through the human Being, learn to understand each other.
Folk liking the idea
of the multi-verse need to wake up, take a good
look, since that's exactly what can be seen.
Learn to commune-with-in mutual
surrender (the
Way of the Mother's-may-i) WITH all our relations,
rocks, stars, even fleas, bed bugs, and
germs. The Night Sky is the inside of all
the parts and organisms, and their glorious order,
turned outside/inside/out - nothing our senses
reveal lacks conscious/experience, although rocks
tell great stories of seasons of storms, with only
the gnomes willing to live above ground, and out
of caves, but then rocks sing in our own bones,
should we be wise enough to listen to the songs of
warm and cold, and light and air.
Read on, read
not. Read widely, keep a diary. Make
friends with words, sing songs to the joy of being
alive ....
This should be kept
in mind. There is no right Choice.
There are no rules that must be followed.
There are just the consequences of the
choices we make, and for which we are responsible.
This booklet is meant to help the ~!~ -ing
reader with coming to a deeper understanding of
the underlying questions, both in their
macrocosmic and microcosmic aspects, of which
certainly the most peculiar is how we act as
stewards of our own minds. Wars for hearts
and minds? Advertising, Commerce,
Politicians, Bosses, Priests, the faery world of
think-like-we-want-you-too is a tough place,
except we consider making of our own inner garden
a temple, built by our own imagination & with
no limits at all. Sacramental
Thinking anyone?
Modern Culture/Civilizations, such as it is on a world-wide scale, lives amidst the fruits and labors of science, both religion&folly, being begat by human beings. Crazy people with unimaginable horrors at the push of a button, or access to too much time mulling over private hurts&hungers - all of us being standing in the Face of our Own Mind's ~!~ tendency ~!~ to divide the world into the primary ignition point: Good&Evil. Who made up that world?
The roots of the
world's monotheisms are eaters of the times of
gods&goddesses - the natural pantheism
everywhere present in Nature, which was Mother to
us all - any other thought being shameless.
Each of us is begotten, our true history a
mystery, as is our future. I wrote recently:
"I can raise a middle finger, but I can't make
one".
This booklet-like
cyberspace creature is also a companion for the
book: The
Art of God: an actual theory of Everything. (my master's thesis in/on the
school of life) In this latter book a
general view of our human situation is elaborated,
in the form of a scientific theory. The
whys and wherefores are laid out in that work, and
a few aspects of the present discussion
>here< are there presented amidst a deeper
context. But the book - The
Art of God - did
not have space, or time, for the more intimate
aspects of the question of the meaning of Evil, which then had to have its
own presentation here.
If Good&Evil are to be dethroned, that must
necessarily be a part of the/a return of the
Goddesses aspects, not just the males, but the
females. Something of the Highest imprinted
itself on us, and left behind spices and
wonder. Cern
keeps trying to force
Her
secrets from Her tinyest tribes. When
encountering, on the Earth, the
always-been-there-alien-seeming consciousness of
mom nature&friends, forms of politeness
required ... didn't your mothers ever teach you
anything, Mr Physics know it alls, ... you might
want to behave at least a little bit, civilized
... otherwise, ... below, notice, how the other
trees gather, around the Lady of the Waters, naked
unashamed in age, limbs still outstretched for
visiting birds to rest. So
much trouble in the world ...
The
Grandmother Tree at River
House
*
*
*
Language, particularly as regards the meaning of a word, has a certain flexibility - this the poet teaches, as well as the philosopher. Their work is often creative of new meaning from the old words of a language - the new in language/meaning often comes to us from their songs, sometimes even new words. After which the genius of meaning/language descends from its natural heaven in the higher regions of human thought, down to the more earthly realms where the passions of human beings takes possession of language and meaning and often sheds the higher meanings in order to express what only appears to be the coarse and the mundane.
Physics has contributed greatly to the
possibilities, allowing one to refer, with glee,
to the quantum/entanglements living in the
black-hole of a banker's heart.
Words can have a
dictionary or lexical meaning, but the speaker has
the freedom to mean only what he or she intends to
mean and is not bound to any convention - social
or dictionary or otherwise. Take for example
the word “fuck”. To utter this word in many
public forums is to on occasion bring down the ire
of censorship, although often the persons urging
censorship will hypocritically use “fuck” frequently in their private
language when among friends. This goes for a
lot of language (meanings) as well, thus we
have had to invent the term “politically correct”
to give a label to the public social-censorship
that erupts when language and meaning is used in a
way that inspires critics of that use to blow
their noses on someone else's speech.
My grandson writes books of poetry&prose,
while in and then coming out of adolescence, such
as: "The Mundane And Often Profane"; "Mediocrity
Monograph": "Reflections From The Void"; "The
Mundane And Often Profane Visual Companion"; "The
Morose And Often Gross". Just escaped Columbia
with a Masters in Urban somethings, now earning
bread&board working for a level of government
lucky to have him.
His mom, my first daughter, has her own books'n
stuff: "When
You Can't Scream ... or 10 Reasons Why I Smoke".
Family "trees" be remarkable intersection nexi ...
Life - trees are
unspeakably gentle. Turtles go slow, yet
trees are the Slow revealing its time-self.
Squirrels, on the other hand, or birds, they Dance
and Cavort. A tree a earth-home to each
leaf/individualized moment of breath-sharing, all
of life/living giving receiving eucharist, sunlit
from above, making substanance - take and eat this
is my body and my blood of the new covenant ... no
Life, no us.
People make language. Languages live and
die, metamorphose & dance ~!~!~!~ code on a
page, ...
Meanings often also have different functions in different contexts and as well vary according to the way the speaker will emphasize by tone of voice a word in speech. Fuck is a perfect example of this kind of word, that has such a variety of purposes in human speech as to be almost capable of transcending its dictionary meaning altogether. We can use that expression to mean anything from the act of sex to the abuse a boss weathers upon one of their workers. When your boss fucks you, he is not usually engaged in sex, but rather seemingly trying to ruin your life.
The Grandmother Tree at Forest-Home
I’m going to fuck up your face says the thug to his
victim. He’s a fucking son-of-a-bitch says the father about
his son-in-law. This same word also has, in
different regions of the earth, its own often
varied peculiar gesture, using the arm, the hand,
and sometimes certain fingers. This word is
often used when expressing surprise: “Well, fuck me!”. The word has transcended
its dictionary meaning as regards the act of sex,
and become a word denoting strong emphasis
concerning almost anything: “That’s a fucking good looking woman!”.
It remains often
socially incorrect - in the sense of speech in
polite company, although among some groups it is
used so frequently as to be the principle
adjective and adverb by which emphasis is given to
most nouns. The comedian George Carlin
sometimes used it hundreds of times in a single
hour-long comedy set-piece. Most people know
when to use it, and when not, given the social
context in which they are speaking.
Some people would say that to use such a word is to be or do evil. Fuck does on occasion have an easy time being used in a context in which something more than a moral judgment is implied, while the word evil almost exclusively seems to involve a moral evaluation of some kind or another. Evil entered the forecourt of political language with Reagan’s “the evil empire” and then George W. Bush’s “the axis of evil”. Not being a verb, it doesn’t have the flexibility of fuck, however. We don’t evil. We maybe are evil, or do evil, but evil remains mostly a noun, and once in a while an adjective.
The Dark, unformed,
uncreated, unexpected, constantly scarily
surprising, often dangerous, wounding even unto
death - torn away from Life and Living.
~!~!~!~!~!~
In a way evil, as a moral evaluation, seems to
need to refer to something so base and degenerate
that it is hard for many to not think in terms of
evil and hell. Those who do evil are condemned in many religions to
whatever that religion considers the worst aspect
of the afterlife: some kind of hell. Creatures from hellish
regions, often called demons, are axiomatically
doers of evil. The Horror Movie, as a genre,
has explored all kinds of visual and dramatic and
traditional forms of “evil”, as do those TV dramas
involving the law enforcement profilers that chase
serial killers.
Pornography and
sexually explicit materials are to some considered
evil, although the word obscene is more frequently used. A
famous Supreme Court Justice remarked that while
he can’t define the obscene he knows it when he sees it.
There is something in this that we
should recognize as we momentarily pass it by: politically incorrect speech, swear words, that which is evil,
and that which is obscene are most often known (or
at least judged) by the reaction of human beings to
something. Like the Justice, we feel (as in
believe) we know it when we see it or hear it.
There is an important warning here, however.
We create a problem when we take our
individual point of view and believe it should be
universal - that is, It is to apply to all, not just
to our personal judgments.
It is one of more
wonderful pot-boilers in Media: public
shamming of uncivilized males, who are already public
figures.
Public language, having acquired the dreaded
"values", whose results are as promised by the
Casandra Harold Bloom,... modern public
language upped the ante on race (White
Privilege; Black Lives Matter;) and
sexual/maze-flirting/morals (what is or is not
appropriate in the dance of flirting and being
actually powerful and dangerous). Robert
Bly in Iron John and the Sibling Society
wonders whether too much mother&wife, and
wearing of masks, makes communionwith/between
any two three or four human beings
possible. Fact is that Porn won the
Internet wars. Replacing a healthy
ceremonial relationship among the divisions,
once owned by aboriginal folks. Can sex
be evil? Sick? Its not love
making, when ... done in secret along -
someone needs to touch me and get me off in
the loneliness of Now ... more Ways then
people to discover the Eros in the Own Soul.
Fate led me to a teacher, Candece, she of the
highland scottish seers, and the native
american shamans - talented ... all Woman,
amazing scary life - hard so hard to live with
- she suggested I need to examine the
posibility that Western Culture has not the
least clue about sex, not the least
clue. Goddess religions (Earth
Religions), all that lower chakra stuff is
holy, if we slow down enough to study
it. Told me, more or less, to go inside
yourself, and drag the man you are, out from
behind the covers of sin.
At the same time paradoxes abound. For many the violence and blood splatter in modern films and television is far more obscene than depictions of the act of sex. For many seeing someone fuck is not as bad or evil as seeing someone’s head get chopped off, with copious amounts of blood conspicuously spurting from the neck. On the other hand, in lots of places in the world there is a tradition of erotic art, and ages ago even the earthly aspects of physical love were celebrated in Temples as sacred.
The Teaching Tree, in A Monster Calls, voiced by
Liam Neeson.
Every Culture in the
World is Amazing. Every damn one of
them. You be thinking yours is better, ... I'm a white
privileged, Christian, son of Montana, American
Shaman. Its a tough job, but someone
has to do it. My
current Amazon book page - all used.
All the various cultures were not until most
recent times interconnected. These cultures
are basically alien to each other, and others
unlike our tribal identity are often
feared. Each culture often is a
mixture/layers of culture one on top the other,
only visible if experienced, both the place and
the related languages. For a literary tour:
Neal Stephenson's The
Baroque Cycle. Only philologists, such
as Owen
Barfield, know the treasures buried in the
history of languages.
Modern people are also well aware of the various
places in the world where female genitals are
mutilated for seeming religious purposes.
The Victorian era of recent English
history has entered our language such that certain
public negative attitudes towards sex are called:
Victorian. Some assert that until that
time, there was no pornography, only various
coarser versions of erotic art. Note also
that, there are different rules regarding the way
women dress that vary over the whole world.
In some regions of
tribal Africa women do not hide their breasts.
Where certain forms of Islam
predominate, the whole female form is covered
except for the eyes. Violating prohibitions
against the exposing of skin can lead to death by
stoning. The rape of a daughter so
disturbs family honor in some places that the
victim is killed. Nude (clothing optional)
beaches exist in many places. Emphasis on
the female form in Western cultures has become so
outrageous (or free, depending upon your point of
view) that certain television shows and movies are
built around the way they display “tits” and
“ass”.
The length of skirts seems to rise and fall according to the dictates of the so-called fashion industry, as well as how much skin is exposed. Most recently the female belly (and more and more the young female belly) has come to be “exposed”. Cleavage exposure varies according to “taste”(?). Women wear all manner of clothes in the West, frequently designed by men, that are uncomfortable and often harmful (the spike heel on shoes, for example). A ballerina destroys her feet for her art, and the binding of the feet of little girls still can be found in parts of Asia.
Depending upon one’s
taste or moral values, much is okay and much is
not-okay. Everyone has a point of view, and
there is clearly no universal agreement. Is
something merely tasteless or obscene or
ultimately evil, or godForbid!: "inappropriate"?
The
pseudo-philosopher Sam Harris thinks that science
can teach us true and objective moral values.
In the recent debate Harris had with
the philosophy professor William Lane Craig, both,
although on opposite sides as regards God’s
interests and existence, seemed to agree that
whether via science or the teachings of God, one
could find absolute rules of what is or is not moral -
or what is or is not good and what is or is not
evil. Right and wrong can be grasped
as certainties - both seemed to assert.
Contrast that point of view with the spiritual teacher (the Magic Path) Franz Bardon, who said: there is nothing unclean in the whole creation; and that: evil is a human conception. Catherine MacCoun, in her book On Becoming An Alchemist, writes that no one sets out to do evil, but rather everyone believes what they do is a good. At the same time, the folk wisdom is: the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and, there is this saying of Christ in the Gospels: Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it.
Is it possible to
reconcile all these varied points of view?
To endeavor to answer that question is the
purpose of this small book. An important
caveat: the author’s experience is that true
research on Evil can only be done by facing these
impulses in one’s own soul, for there they can be
most intimately known. To look to others, as
if we can see Evil there, is to already make an
unjustifiable presumption. Here’s Christ
from the Sermon on the Mount:
Don’t judge, so that you won’t be
judged; you will be sentenced to the same sentence
that you sentence others, and by whatever standard
you measure you will be measured. Why do you look at
the splinter in your brother’s eye but don’t notice
the log in your own eye? And how can you say to your
brother, ‘Let me get that splinter out of your eye,’
with that log there in your own eye? You fake, first
get the log out of your own eye, and then you can
see about getting the splinter out of your brother’s
eye!
*
*
*
Victoria’s Real Secret
"a music leads the mind through the
starry night
and the brain must expand to contain the flight
like a tree growing branches at the speed of light"
The
Memory of Whiteness: A Scientific Romance
By Kim Stanley Robinson
A main problem with
understanding Evil is our arrogant self-ignorance
- no surprise there. We easily see it in
others (or so we believe), but seldom are willing
to admit to it ourselves. The most
significant modern social process working deeply
with that problem is Alcoholics Anonymous and its
progeny, which has begun to socially replace the
confessional of the Catholic Church, with a
community and semi-public confessional.
No longer do we hide
our so-called sin in a curtained box where only a
priest is to know of it, but we admit our weakness in a very special public place - a
place where anonymity is promised as a core social
value. Even the idea of God is
different in AA, than in the Church, as it is
intentionally connected to our personal
freedom - we admit things to God as
we
understand Him in
AA, not as a religious institution defines Him.
Not only that, but in
AA we are not forgiven for a privately confessed
sin, and given some prayers as penance.
Rather we are helped to go to those we have
harmed and seek to repair what was done by finding
a way to make amends. Here we see a fault
line, as it were, between the way the the Past -
the Church - handled the molestation crisis, and the way those in AA
(the Present and Future) deal with what appears to
be their moral errors.
As we know the Church
was able for decades to keep hidden (and thus
allow their continuance) these crimes, by hiding
them in the confessional. And even this
hiding is now understood itself as a major
contributor to the fundamental problem. In
AA we enter into a group awareness of our
misdeeds, and get help from others who share our
failings. Who better to help us overcome
them. Only an already semi-publicly
confessed alcoholic can help us deal with our own
similar failings. When it is hidden, and
then protected by a social institution, the
failing is never resolved because we - the
self-confessed doer of evil - have never faced it
squarely.
What Christ spoke of,
as the problem of hypocrisy in the Sermon on the
Mount, is overcome when the flaw is made
semi-public among a group who share our flaws,
because no other group is also able to help us,
given that they too have dealt already with that
particular beam in their own eye, before seeking
to help us with the related mote in ours.
The institution (the
Church) preserved Itself at the expense of many
future victims. AA is not any kind of
institution, given that each meeting is an
independent social process in itself, there being
no priests or any hierarchy defining what is to be
done or not done. Only someone actually
practiced at being in recovery (usually the
sponsor), can help someone needing to enter
recovery. The Priest in the confessional
often lacks the life experience to really
appreciate the deeper psychological elements
living in the person with their flaw.
Religious and sentimental pieties don’t work
as well as practical knowledge of the real
struggles for genuine self-transformation.
Granted AA is
criticized by many, but all that really shows is
that this kind of work is not so easy as some
would hope. The Church (offered here mostly
for contrast, not so much to pick on it) is
weighed down by its past, and by the fact that in
many ways it has never understood what Christ
really taught in the first place. In the
authentic recovery disciplines of AA, Christ’s
teaching lives as a practice in a way the Church
only really had in its beginnings (or in the
religious orders), before it was joined to the
failing Roman Empire in the fourth Century ...
recall the last phrases of the Sermon on the
Mount:
So anyone who hears these words from
me and does them will become like a sensible man who
built his house on bedrock, and the rain came down
and the floods came and the winds hurled themselves
at the house, and it didn’t fall because it was
grounded on the rock. And anyone who
hears these words from me and doesn’t do them, will
become like a stupid man who built his house on
sand, and the rain came down and the floods came and
the winds beat at the house, and it fell, and its
down fall was tremendous.
The institutional
Church built its house on sand (no real practice),
and when the discovery of the decades of hidden
abuse (the rain, and floods and winds) came, this
institutional Church fell (see my essay on the
Third Fatima Prophecy for details: Saving the
Catholic Religion from the Roman Church).
*
*
*
the True Nature of the House of the
Soul
The
Fundamentals of Anthroposophy
The very deep and
wise philosopher-seer, Rudolf Steiner, in his
lectures collected under the title: From
Symptom
to Reality in Modern History, briefly discussed the Mystery of
Evil in this metaphorical way - here I have
paraphrased his thoughts:
Imagine a train running on some tracks.
The train - its engines and cars - has a point
or purpose as it were. There is goodness
inherent in its comings and goings. Human
perception, being human, notices mostly the wearing
out of the rails, caused by the travels of the
train, and thinks of this wearing out as evil or
sin.
Consider for the
moment that the “house” that can be built on rock
or sand is our own inner organism - our own soul-spirit/being/essence-nature. We need to keep in
mind while we do this just how complicated human
beings are, especially inwardly. This is so
regardless of modern brain sciences, which have
basically assumed the mind
(soul-spirit/being/essence-nature of the human being) is only a
function of the material brain, and that there is
no spirit at all. Deconstructing the
erroneous thinking of science in that regard was
one of the purposes of my The
Art of God.
the
Songs of a True White Brother
There is an ancient
idea from the Cultural East concerning seven
energy centers that are thought to be some of the
dynamic aspects of the house of the soul - the
inner core of the human organism. These
tradition calls: Lotus Flowers or the Chakras:
(the crown chakra; the eyebrow chakra; the throat
chakra; the heart chakra; and solar plexus chakra;
the reproductive chakra and the base - or the
spine - chakra). While conventional
materialistic science doesn’t like these ideas,
that prejudice doesn’t make them untrue - just not
observed.
In Steiner’s metaphor
above, these energy centers are the “trains” - the
engines and the cars. If, for example, we
didn’t have the desire/drive for procreation, no
new human beings would be born. If we didn’t
have hunger, we would starve and the physical body
would die. If we don’t care about each other
- via the “heart”, we suffer as well.
What we observe is that the carnal body and as well our social communities (such as families) suffer when there is an excess of some kind related to these psychic (soulful) energy drivers in our existence. The carnal body and our social communities are the “rails” - we see the harm from the excesses and this we have learned over time to culturally call: evil or sin.
Dragon
Riders: the human being in maturity
Another example, this
time regarding the mind (something very complicated as
well): If we don’t discipline our “mind” we
can become obsessed, and thus arises, for example,
the social phenomena we call: the stalker.
If for various reasons we can’t control our
thoughts (such as in certain so-called mental
illnesses), we also loose our way.
Since the Age of
Science began, humanity has been trying to pin
down the imagined causes of human defects, but our
labors have been largely in vain because we mostly
don’t consider human beings to be anything other
than matter. Since we are objectively far
more than solely matter, the absence of that
understanding disables our thinking when we try to
solve social issues connected to human defects and
flaws. At the same time, this confusion over
whether or not human beings are both spirit and
matter is a quite complicated problem, such that
the reader here will have to go to the above
mentioned book: The Art of
God: and actual theory of Everything, for the solution to those wider
questions.
Here, in our seeking
to better understand The Mystery of Evil, we face
more practical problems, and it is toward those
issues that we need to go next. Immediately
above I just wanted to point toward the house of
our soul - our own inner organism - suggesting
that what
we tend to call evil is an indirect effect of
other purposes, and that there is significant human
meaning to be yet discovered.
This house of the
soul is quite complicated, and major portions of
it are not visible to the eye (such as the
traditional energy centers). At the
same time, these “not visible to the eye” aspects
of our nature are visible to our own
introspection. I can learn to see in myself
something I don’t well see in others - the
existence of my beam is apparent to my own inward
perceptions. What Christ promised in the
Sermon on the Mount was that if (and only if) I
learn to master my own “beam” will I discover how
to help someone with their “mote”.
Now some might think
that AA mentioned above is only valuable if one is
an alcoholic or addict etc. The fact is AA
is the social model for a whole new “community”
social process by which anyone can work on their
self observed flaws. After all, we first
have to admit to ourselves we are flawed and need
help, and this is often a dynamic social processes
that is difficult to face, having acquired in AA
the name: hitting bottom. Most people don’t want
to admit to flaws at all (witness the many
politicians and celebrities whose flaws become
public), and we call this refusal to admit to
flaws: denial. We continue to refuse to
admit to flaws until life hits us upside the head
over and over again, and our self destructive
behaviors have gotten so flagrant that we no
longer can pretend they do not exist.
That these impulses flow over to the members of our own community and family is also something we deny. The dry-drunk (not actively drinking) still behaves according to his addictive psychology - frequently angry and dominating, and never able to admit to his own responsibilities or flaws.
Help
is always around, however, and many are the Ways
we may travel.
If fact, in the
Al-anon movement a whole necessary secondary
social process has been discovered. How do
people live with personalities who will not admit
(continue to deny) their self destructive flaws
that also harm others? If we have an addict
in our family, we don’t have to remain the passive
victims of their addictive behaviors, but we still
need to find those who share our dilemmas if we
wish to learn what to do.
There are practical
arts here, such that our incapacity to live with
or among others with such obvious flaws is itself
a flaw. We need help to learn the best ways
to live with an alcoholic, and if we don’t we
become enablers of their addictions.
Anti-social flaws require social
solutions - everyone is involved. The simple
truth is we can’t fix the person with the flaw
(with the mote). Only they can fix
themselves, and until we simultaneously learn to
work on our own “beams”, we will not really
understand how to help them “fix”
themselves.
If your head is
starting to spin around a little bit here, good.
We are complicated, we human beings, and so
are our social arrangements. The teaching of
Christ is simple to state: learn not to judge.
The doing of that in practice is not so
simple.
We are only beginning
to appreciate what is latent in the vocabulary of
recovery, for many of our social ills are not even
recognized as needing something like AA or Al-anon
to help. Consider the greed driving the
current financial problems of the world. Is
that not an addiction? What about the
will-to-power of the many political leaders?
Is that too not an “addiction”? What
does a people do when their leaders in finance and
politics live in denial of their addictions to
wealth and power? How do we enable them with
our own weaknesses, or the false belief that we
have no choice but to end up as helpless victims
of the excesses of others?
The
teachings of the Sermon on the Mount reach quite
far. Quite
far In Deed.
Who or What am I, that I too am Flawed
We are all human
beings. That said, just what is a human
being? The main scientific paradigm is that
the human being is an accidental consequence of
random events in a vast uncaring cosmos.
This is what the Theory of Evolution and the
Theory of the Big Bang teach. Science - at
least at this stage of its development, in this
sense, has it very wrong.
To lay out the
details of the underlying philosophical and
scientific problems, I had to write a whole book,
mentioned above: The
Art of God: an actual theory of Everything.
In that book, I
suggested that the truth will turn out to be that
a human being is an immortal spirit, experiencing
multiple lives over eons of time in order to
learn. Existence is a divinely authored
school, of a remarkable and detailed intricacy and
intimacy. What I had little time to deal
with in that book, was the more intimate aspects
of the nature of the double, or the doppleganger
or the shadow. I could hint, but not do
justice to the main facts regarding the
nature of Evil and how the individual human being
contributes to that aspect of our shared
existence.
Here in this booklet
I am trying to provide more detail.
In a couple of other
books of mine [the
Way of the Fool, and American
Anthroposophy],
I put this symbolic diagram:
Christ Jesus
Guardian Angel
~i~AM~
[sense world < soul (A/d) < I-am > (L/d) soul > spiritual world]
human double
(asuras)
the Divine Mother
... out of which I
separate for emphasis, this sub-diagram:
~i~AM~
(A/d) < I-am > (L/d)
[human (d)]
This is not an
accurate picture, so much as it is a thematic
schematic of some structural relationships.
It is therefore a very poorly drawn abstract
of a whole set of maps, none
of which describe the actual territory.
The reason for "i-AM" is to emphasis that this
word refers to our nature which is more clearly
understood as a verb, not a noun. "i"ness is
necessary, but secondary to what acts.
what/which/who/why/whatever: Acts is ~!~ Primeval
~!~ Fire ~!~ . Look in a mirror.
Here, in this
word/picture masque, I am going to tell you how to
study the territory, based upon several decades of
personal experience of such study. Or Not.
Lets start with the
terms: soul and spirit. We could also use
the terms: consciousness and self-consciousness
and be speaking of the same things. There is
that-which-experiences (self-consciousness, or spirit
~!~!~!~!~) and the content of those experiences (the field of consciousness, or soul ~!@#$%^&*()_+).
For example, you are
presently reading some text upon a page.
“You”, in this example, are a
self-consciousness experiencer, and the content of
your experience includes (but is not limited to)
the booklet/tablet/whatever you hold in your hand.
Other aspects of your field of consciousness includes what it
feels like to sit in the chair in which your are
sitting, any incidental sounds in the background
(music, kids yelling) as well as incidental
experiences in your visual field besides this
booklet.
As you “read” you may be sub-vocalizing the words, and as well using your mind to seek the meaning of the text. The text itself is a code - lines of dark on white, while the meaning of the text is only created by your mind - a skill it acquired when you learned to read. Most of us don’t pay any attention at all to the concepts created by our self-consciousness when we read, ... we just read and arrive at some understanding of the text. We then think (as in believe) we “know” what we believe the text to mean.
To a certain degree, part of what is happening as you read is that the <“attention”> of your mind (of your self-consciousness as it is married to your field of consciousness) is directed to a purpose (reading), from which purpose other experiences can enter your consciousness created by some kind of a “distraction” (a dog barks). Notice I joined together (married) self-consciousness and the field of consciousness, for that is what we experience - their natural unity.
the Madonna
of Raphel too chaste for reality,
THE MOTHER Abides Surrendering ....
We experience what we
call mind as this union of self-consciousness and
the field of consciousness. “I” know I am
reading, as reading is my intention, and it is my “I”
(self-consciousness) that is directing my attention to its objects.
Suppose my spouse
calls from another room and wants my “attention” -
wants to change the attention of my
self-consciousness to include within my
consciousness his/her needs and wants. I may
for a moment not want to be disturbed in my
reading, but an instant of reflection may lead me
to recognizing that it is better (from my present
in the moment point of view) if I give to my
spouse the attention he/she wants.
That just described above is a brief version of the territory for which the diagrams above are maps. My self-consciousness I am naming the I-am, and the conscience-like moment of reflection (choosing to let my reading be disturbed to pay attention to my spouse) I am labeling the ~i~AM~. These two appear (as a map) thus:
The Best Six Doctors
Anywhere, and no one can deny it, are:
crown chakra
antenna
hair ~!~!~!~!~!~!~
sunshine
eyebrow chakra
O eye
wounds
O
water
?nose?touches?
Throat Chakra &
&
rest&
heart/breathing
AIR
To borrow from other
systems of thought, let us call these (together)
the lower and the higher ego. I am relating
the higher ego (~i~AM~) obviously to what we experience as
conscience, and the lower ego (I-am) to what we general think of us our
self-consciousness. Always keep in mind that
the map is not the territory. And, That an
alchemical wedding is sought, not mutually assured
annihilation.
This is the
dancing/fiery pagan core of our spirit, these two
- this lower and higher ego courting among
????????????????
........... its
many mini-me selves, Whitman's multitudes ... hard
to love others if you don't love yourself ...
and which are to be educated over the many
incarnations of our human existence. During
this education/learning process, the possibility
exists for the lower ego and the higher ego to
marry (unite), the details of which we will go
into later.
Let us next look at
this symbol set (map):
[sense world < soul (A/d) < I-am
> (L/d) soul > spiritual world]
and this sub-set
within the above:
soul (A/d) < I-am
> (L/d) soul
The core of our human
nature (our spirit or self-consciousness) sits
within the soul (or field of consciousness).
We actually look out
at two different worlds from this seat of the
self-consciousness within the field of
consciousness:
[sense world <
,,~~~~!experiencing!~~~~..
> spiritual world]
This sense world we are mostly familiar with, as it governs our daily existence from the moment of waking to the moment of going back to sleep once more. In our culture we don’t recognize that our interior world is the entrance to the spiritual world, given the assumptions regarding the mind common to the dominate paradigm of materialistic science (all is matter, there is no spirit). For an alternative vision see: Cowboy Bebop - and the physics of thought as moral art.
[ For those familiar with the last Harry
Potter movie, there is a scene (which appears to
take place in the world of the dead), where Harry
has a conversation with his now deceased mentor
Dumbledore. Harry wonders aloud whether he
should believe what he seems to be experiencing,
saying something like: this
can’t be real as it is only happening in my mind. To which Dumbledore replies,
essentially: What makes you think what
happens in your mind is not real?]
The interior world
(as against the exterior sense world) - the narrow
gate (the entrance
to the spiritual world) - is that world where we
experience thoughts, feelings and impulses of the
will. Others cannot see this aspect of our
existence - it only appears inwardly to us, and we
often swim in it the same way a fish swims in
water - we are mostly unaware of it.
What a lie detector machine tries to capture by measuring certain very limited phenomena is only a vain ghost of the real nature of our interior experience. What someone who was once called a psychic, or now an intuitive, experiences is some of the surface (yet hidden) elements of this interior world. All of us have intuitive (spiritual) experiences. We just don’t live in a culture that knows what to do with these experiences, given the dominance of the paradigm that all is matter and there is no spirit.
yet, what do we/I/you/me/thou/thee contribute?
Yet the fact remains
that it is from this interior (spiritual) life of
the human being that there arises that which
appears to be good and evil and then entered into
our shared social world when patriarchal dominion over required the application of
Sinfulness from the Pulpit, which is why it is so
crucial to acquire real knowledge of the facts of
this world of our interior life. Fear of
ourselves has many undesirable consequences, as
revealed in the News Daily.
We need to face this
Shadow* or Double in a fully objective fashion.
Steiner/Bornfield
describes the reason for this in Lucifer
and Ahriman, at
page 21: “...the very purpose of our Fifth
Post-Atlantean epoch is that man should
become increasingly conscious of what
takes effect through him in earthly
existence. [emphasis added]
[*While I recognize the use of the term the Shadow by those connected to the works of Jung, I am not using this term with the same meanings to which they adhere. I actually mean (in a metaphorical sense) something more akin to an actual shadow cast by a human being when with their density and solidity they stand between something and ”the light”. We (our “I") stands in between the ”divine light” and the world of earthly existence, and casts a shadow into that world by our density or stubbornness - the solidity or “fallen nature" of the baser moral qualities of our “I-am”]
Still, ~!~!~!~!~!!!!! dancing, singing, playing, getting intoxicated is divine ... we need not remain conquered by the staid, the boring, the scared to move, ... Anarchy is Coming.
It all gets more
complicated, as the above maps included these
symbols:
(A/d) (L/d)
[human (d)]
we are not alone inside, in the quiet,
...
some folks are troubled there, mostly because
western
medicine does not realize
the Mother is VERY REAL
& well, there are Imps
of the perverse,
a boundary
condition
unnaturally across without training
shaman becoming
dangerous
thank all the old gods&goddesses & the new:
music rules
The letter (d) is meant to refer to the double, and
the structure above means to suggest that this
double is in fact threefold in its nature.
This structure/creation is not unknown to
humanity, although for a time it had to be
forgotten. Here are some references:
Here is how the
double (shadow) is described in a Native American
work: “Waynaboozoo’s Spirit
Father advised him: ‘You have a twin brother whom
you have wondered about and whom you would seek.
This I tell you: he is your other side in all
things and in all ways. He is with you...do
not seek him. Do not wish to know him, but
understand him. You will walk in the path of
peace...he would not. You are kind...he is
not. You are humble...he is not. You are
generous...he is not. You seek the good in
things...he does not. You shall respect
others...he will not. You will seek the
goodness in others...he will not. You are the
light...he is the darkness. Know that he is
with you, understand him.'” From the Mishomis Book The
voice of the Ojibway by Edw. BentonBanai, 1979.]
And the story of the two wolves (my version): A young man was speaking with his grandfather, and was troubled by impulses he had inside him to be mean, in imitation of some of his friends. His grandfather taught him as follows: Inside you are two wolves. One hungers to do the good, to be kind and to be wise. The other hungers to do evil, to be selfish and make trouble for others. This you must understand. The young man then said: But, grandfather, what do I do, how do I become the good wolf instead of the bad one? To which his grandfather replied: It all depends on which wolf you feed.
Let me also quote
from the Quoran: “Qul a’udhu
birabbin nas. Malikin nas. Ilahin nas. Min sharril
waswasil khannas. Alladhi yuwaswisu fi sudurinnas.
Minal jinnati wannas”,
or in English: “Say, I seek
refuge in the Lord of mankind, the King of mankind,
the God of mankind, from the mischief of the
sneaking whisperer, who whispers in the hearts of
mankind from among the jinn and mankind.”
Or from the Lord’s
Prayer, traditional version: Lead
us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. And from The
Unvarnished Gospels,
translated by Andy Gaus, this same verse:
Matthew 6:13
And do not put us to the test, but snatch us from the
Evil One’s clutches, ...
So, the core of each
of us:
~i~AM~
I-am
... is then
surrounded by this threefold double-complex,
resulting in this symbol set:
~i~AM~
(A/d) < I-am > (L/d)
[human (d)]
Notice that the
higher ego is free of the impediments attached to
the lower ego. Further, via the conscience
(the higher ego) the total organism of the
self-consciousness and field of consciousness is
connected via the Guardian Angel to the higher
spiritual powers, thus:
Christ Jesus
Guardian Angel
~i~AM~
< I-am >
Because the human being is unlearned, and learning, it needs this threefold double-complex in order to pass through the experiences of life - that is we need both earthly help (the threefold-double complex) and heavenly help (the Guardian Angel as an intermediary to the higher power).
Next, let us consider
the threefold double-complex by itself, as
connected to the lower ego:
(A/d) < I-am > (L/d)
[human (d)]
helpers, actually ... guide us to karma,
make sure we have the right
brick-weights in our invisible packs of troubles
a mistake is often a blessing, and illness
most assuredly is ...
Tradition gives
certain names for these “creatures”, who lie
nearest at hand to the I-am in the soul.
Here we will use that which was worked out
by Rudolf Steiner, then later further developed by
Valentin Tomberg. Let me repeat - as a
practitioner for decades of introspective science
I have direct experience of these beings. They help with the falling
down, the increase in gravitas, ??? what part of
that is just us, forgetting how to dance and
sing???
Steiner gave us these
names: Ahriman for A, and Lucifer for L. Now these classes of non-material
invisible to the physical senses spiritual beings are hierarchical - that is they have
a pyramid like order, such that the actual Being Ahriman and the actual Being Lucifer* sit like corporate or
king-like bosses at the top of the pyramid, which
then via a structure like gloves within glove
within gloves, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
brings
down
into
the
individual soul a tiny “creature” that can be
called the individual ahrimaic or luciferic
double, ... depending upon what role it plays
within the soul or field of consciousness.
[*Lucifer, according
to some traditions, redeemed himself following
Christ’s Crucifixion, and became then a member of
the Paraclete - the community of spiritual beings
whose totality we call: the Holy Spirit.
Lucifer’s hierarchies remain at their
previous tasks, however.]
a central aspect of
the mystery of evil is the primal paradox ... from
the point of view of the "others", now is already
perfection, and the only ones learning on the job
are those beings we call: human, whose nature it is
to be displeased, with the whole gift of life,
existence, feeling, thinking, dreaming, ... magical
thinking is needed, and actually works
when&if rightly applied.
Now everything in the Creation is in the nature of Beings of Spirit, such that the shadow our I-am casts, because of its own unredeemed nature, results in the presence of a spiritual being. Its not a mere effect like the physical shadow we see when light does not pass through us, but as all is being, every aspect of reality that is not “I” is other beings - including the double. There actually are no “things” in the way we ordinarily think.
How many children are
called names, like bad, or good, or worse and
worse and worse. Wounds of soul ... become
splinters in the growing eye of character .... Born to Run ...
Clog up your mental
arteries with enough dead-wooden thoughts - the
garden there in most of us could always use some
attention - although in soul-dynamics it is often
the soil that needs enlivening. What seems
by culture to be base, may well have a
misunderstood reality when observed
empirically. Men and women masturbate, or
engage in Onanism-whatevers. Seeds are
many. Nature's choice for insuring wide
distributions of treasured substances.
Powerful forces live there, yes, but please leave
the meaning of the sacred to that which is clearly
meant to be the creator of their own meaning,
given that they are endowed with existence in this
World of Woes. The Divine Mystery Made US for a reason, which I suspect is not
at all as lame as we treat each other.
So much seas of troubles, and sometimes you just
want to let go, turn over the soil of that life,
and take a rest ... Or, SIGH, maybe not, maybe
dream up a little hope now and then, food for the
heart. There be Fairies lurking about, don't
you know. Magical/pagan thinking is oddly
wise. Anyone&Everyone in the world is a
natural shaman/ness (if you wish). Life
makes us all wise, or we are soon dead/recycled
for the next dance. Children - a category of
Being that tells a remarkable tale. We are
taking too much childhood from the world, and the
children are not pleased. That fierceness of
adolescent and post adolescent fire breathing
politics, getting more and more out in the open
these days.
I'm betting on the Children, ... mostly since it
is clear that Gods&Goddesses have been betting
on Children for Millennia ...
The ahrimanic double
generally mediates between the lower ego and the
sense world, while the luciferic double generally
mediates between the lower ego and the spiritual
world. Tomberg in his Meditations
on the Tarot: a journey into Christian Hermeticism
called aspects of the ahrimanic double the prosecutor, and aspects of the luciferic double
the tempter. These are psychological
(soul-lawful) functions. These are not
the only functions of these beings within the soul.
Because we are in
need of help in understanding the sense world, the
ahrimanic double causes us to believe in absolute*
facts (the sense world is not actually absolute,
but its paradoxes require a subtlety of mind most
of us do not yet possess), and the luciferic
double causes us to believe in absolute* truth,
which gives us all those obsessive and
fundamentalist errors of thought.
*[For this language I
am indebted to Catherine MacCoun’s remarkable: On
Becoming an Alchemist.]
Think of it this way.
We are incomplete (fallen), although this should not be
understood as what some call “original sin”).
This incompleteness is kind of like a
virginity - in our first lives (of many) we were
both innocent and culpable. We made mistakes
(being innocent - lacking knowledge and
experience), and these had consequences which is
symbolized in the Christian and Hebrew Bible by
the end of the time in the Garden.
We fell, out of a time in which we lived originally among spiritual beings as ourselves a spiritual being, into materiality, where for many God is now dead (the new atheism). It is only in materiality that the “I” or spirit can transform itself by having something (the material in all its meanings) which resists our “I”. Only in the density of modern existence can the newly born self-consciousness (see the discussion of the Evolution of Consciousness in The Art of God), feel so existentially involved that the “I” makes out of itself something it can only become through its own forces. Our “I” becomes clay-like and capable of being remodeled through our own wills. Our transformation is fully within our selves to accomplish, according to our own understanding of who we freely choose to become.
The Rising of the Sun in the Mind
At the same time, as
fallen and incomplete, we yet lack certain
capacities, and the positive side of the
three-fold double-complex is that the ahrimanic
and luciferic doubles provide a kind of
intelligence (one directed at the sense world, the
other directed at the world of spirit) that we
lean on until we ourselves can carry out those
tasks. We need these most intimate
companions in the soul.
For higher worlds
(the upper vertical), we have the guardian angel.
For the more earthly tasks (the lower
vertical) we have the doubles.
Now to the human
double, or [human/d]. This is the most
earthly of creatures in the soul, and
Tomberg in Meditations called these beings by
their more ancient name: egregores. I have
found that term in-artistic, and prefer the words:
self-inflicted wounds of soul. These
beings are not part of a hierarchical creation,
out of higher spiritual beings (not gloves within
gloves within gloves: >>>>>>),
but rather they are created by human activity.
They are most
frequently created by repeated rite-like activity
such as that which leads to alcoholism or
addiction. Such a rite as the ritual of
shooting up used by a heroin addict is what
creates, via repetition, a kind of psychic
parasite in the soul, which the heroin addict has
learned to call “the monkey on my back” and the
alcoholic “demon rum”.
Let us now return to
the original symbol set:
Christ Jesus
Guardian Angel
~i~AM~
[sense world < soul (A/d) < I-am > (L/d) soul > spiritual world]
human double
(asuras)
the Divine Mother
... and notice its cross-like nature.
The Cross, as an
spiritual symbol in itself, has both a vertical
aspect and a horizontal aspect. The
horizontal aspect is mostly related to our social
realities - our relationships with each other,
while the vertical aspect is mostly related to our
spiritual realities - our relationships with the
Divine Mystery.
This Cross has both
an upper* vertical gesture and a lower* vertical
gesture.
*[For this language
as well I am indebted to Catherine Maccoun’s
remarkable: On Becoming an
Alchemist., as well
as her wonderful meditation on sex and
anthroposophists, in 1914 or so ...
Germans/Austrians seeking spirit in concert; 'Work
on What has been Spoiled"]
It is on those paths
connected to the lower vertical gesture of
spiritual development that we find this symbol
set:
human double
(asuras)
the Divine Mother
Just as nature has the means by which the decaying world of matter can be taken apart and recycled (various insects, micro organisms etc.), so the decaying (recycling) world of spirit has those Beings that can take apart spirit, in the literature called: the Asuras. We only come close to seeing the activity of the Asuras when we find a human being so lost and consumed by their darker tendencies that we see that aspect of them we would normally call “the human spirit” disappearing. This activity is, by the way, holy art. The Asuras are not unclean, yet with life there are constantly processes of decay, leading to rebirth, and decay is always done impeccably.
Christ Blesses the Grays, by themikehoffman
The most common of
these are such as the heavy-use crack addicts.
In addition, actors who have nearly given up
their humanity in an effort to portray evil in
the human can begin to find themselves
deeply troubled, such as what we know as connected
to the death of the actor Heath Ledger after his
work in the movie The Dark
Knight, or the
soul-decay of Marlon Brando following his
portrayal of Colonel Kurtz in the movie Apocalypse
Now.
When such as Eric
Harris and Dyland Klebold, the
actors in the Columbine tragedy, stared
unprepared by their culture into the abyss of
their own souls, they found that what lived in
that abyss stared back at them, after which
they were undone.
If we get too close
to fire we will burn. Tomberg’s Meditations says that to identify with true evil
is to commune with it, and this destroys our vital
elan - our creative
will.
Now these are some of
the most terrible and profound powers of the
Creation - these grave and often ancient (see the
imaginative writing of H. P. Lovecraft) earthly
powers, which is why they are ruled by the Divine
Mother forces. Most of what we have learned
to call Evil is in fact an aspect of the Creation
meant to exist, and which is ruled (set within
limits) by the Divine Mother and her
companions.
It is only the creations of the free human being, and its/his/hers unruly appetites (the Beast from the Abyss of the Unknown and Unexpected) - or the human double, which lies outside the rule of the Divine Mother, and ultimately belongs to us, and thereby connected to our own fates. In granting the human being real freedom, the very Creation, with great love and vulnerability, has surrendered Itself to our Choices.
Do not let the News create despair. Chicken Little and Henny Penny rule that puffed-up self-promoting the Sky may fall, news at 11. Yet/yes many people can lead lives of quiet desperation, but the human spirit ... and we all know this, .... has got more stubborn than ten mules.
All the seeming
horrors of modern existence we will never
understand until we take up a science of the
spirit that includes and acknowledges our dark
sides. Once we do that, we will discover
that the “I” (the lower and higher ego), can be
and is protected by the forces of the Divine
Mother, and as well as by the nature of the
afterlife.
In my book The
Art of God I go
into the details of the afterlife, the kamaloka
experience, and the meaning of karma and
reincarnation, because it is there, where Divine
Justice operates, that the human being most fully
experiences the consequences of his deeds in the
life just passed.
I write this immediate above to suggest that the total structure of our relationship to Evil is full of saving graces, which however eventually require that we awake to them and participate in them in order to find our way in the world intentionally created by the Divine Mystery to have such characteristics. As we go further into these studies, more facts of this kind will become apparent.
"Fox
Network Presents : Let's Fool The Nation"
-
by Robert Nuckels
titled:
Theurgia
("Theurgy
describes
the practice of rituals, sometimes seen as
magical in nature,
performed with the intention of
invoking the action or evoking the presence of one
or more gods,
especially with the goal of achieving henosis
and perfecting oneself" Wikipedia)
Prayer&meditation works just as well ... and so
does the practice of creating art ...
fires we are ~!~!~!~
dancing with fate, .... do we see the art of the
gods yet???, ... pause and take in a great breath,
... modern humanity loves to feel its oats, but we
are nowhere near to actually creating a planet or
another living being out of nothing ... so proudly
we fall in the flames of our own hungers and desires
...
going up, for The Americas, means going down ...
unnatural science believes there is no
"consciousness and life" in rocks&waters
flowing, but if we live in the Americas, ... the
secrets of what happened to Christ, between His
Death on the Cross, and The Resurrection ...
"Christ Blesses
the Greys", by themikehoffman
Are we really ready for choosing to create a new
relationship with what the goddess religions would
have called the Fey, or the Land of Fairie, or the
Underworld, ...
Before this however,
let us consider what is called: The Day of
Judgment. Religious tradition in the
cultural West recognizes a time when the
consequences and price of all our flaws will
become due. The best writing on this I have
read is by Valentin Tomberg in his Meditations
on the Tarot: a journey into Christian Hermeticism, in the Arcanum: Justice. There he points out that the
human community will individually judge itself
after going through a Rite where it remembers all
that it has done through the eons of Time.
As to the question
many preachers assert, that we will then be
condemned to hell for eternity, Tomberg asks who
can justly claim to define and limit God’s love
and God’s forgiveness, suggesting that while any
who chose to be impenitent (unrepentant) could
spend eternity in hell, who during the Rite of the
Day of Judgment, will, upon viewing their errors,
still then not seek and accept the offer of love
and forgiveness.
One last word on the double - the dark side, as it were ...
In my other writings
such as the Way of the Fool and American
Anthroposophy I
write in detail about certain aspects of dealing
practically with the three-fold double complex.
The point so far has been to let the
reader realize what depth and mystery our soul
life contains. These matters we may learn to
empirically and scientifically understand and deal
with, but only in ourselves, not in others.
Our inwardness is rich and complicated, and
the path to discovering that will be individual -
not one of us walks exactly the same path.
Not only that, we are
to be helped - we are not alone. The double
is held within laws by the Mother and the Son,
which includes the fact that we have, in the
soul-region of the heart, independence from all
aspects of the dark. This most remarkable
matter, which bears repeating, is that the battle
ground with evil is within ourselves, not out
there in the world. As we conquer and
discipline ourselves, we win the battle with the
dark. The Mystery of Evil then includes the
fact that we are full participants in a World-wide
Temple Ritual occurring on a large scale over
considerable periods of time.
With then these
ideas, models and symbol sets in mind, let us next
proceed to various kinds of common sins, error or
kinds of possible evil, as a means to find some of
the inherent wisdom of the whole. Often what
we want to call evil, as is suggested by the
Sermon on the Mount, is a projected perception - a
beam in our own eye. Below we will try to
find our way past these beams to the mote.
The Moral Lesson of Daytime Dramas
- a movie -
Lots of people enjoy
watching what we call Soap Operas. Many
people look down on those folks who enjoy watching
these daytime dramas. If we stand back from
these dramatic forms, view them collectively, and
sense their artistic integrity, we will come to
realize that these are basically Morality Plays.
They have a certain excitement, given all the basic impulses displayed: love, affection, hate, murder, theft, and so forth. They also drag out various developments - a nighttime TV drama makes something happen in a couple of hours, which in a Soap might take months to unfold.
There is also a Mystery, given the attachment of many folk to spending their time watching TV, at any time of Day. I've found over the years that if it exists, it may well harbor secrets that will hide from us of we approach the experience with disdain. If you look down upon this activity - the making of&watching of Soap Operas, then perhaps you have overlooked something very basic about what it means to be a human being. Judgments previously made, but not well self-observed, pile up in the mind/soul like a lot of dead wood thoughts, --- there be lots of beams, of all kinds, types, shapes, and not all of them are there to be burned to ash. We need the Beams, as a foundational/elemental of the structure of our own thought-edifice.
http://www.elmwoodreclaimedtimber.com/our-products-price
Made this as an advertisement.
The soul is a house
- a home - and it is ours. We decorate it in
favorite thoughts, feelings and hungers/wants/ woven
together by sighs and words .... uttered, or not;
And all the gods&goddesses see us as wonders ...
to the Divine, we are the central mystery. To
the invisible folk we are moving stars, trailed by
invisible chains, binding us to the earth for a
while. To many of the truly-different-others,
a human being is a living divine spirit
~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~@!~in a temple self-made.
We make a mistake if
we believe these “dramas” have nothing to teach,
for they all share a common lesson, repeated endlessly everywhere over
and over again: the first
misstep is to lie. As characters confront their
life dilemmas, some of which they confront
repeatedly, they have choice after choice between
the truth and a lie, and as soon as the lie is
uttered, all kinds of consequences flow from that
deed.
One lie leads to
another. People hearing the lie are mislead
and then themselves make mistakes of judgment
because they lack the truth. If we step
outside these Morality Plays, to a different
literature we might find this term: The Father of
Lies, sometimes referring to a spiritual Being we
might call Satan, or the Devil. In Rudolf
Steiner’s spiritual paradigm these are two
different Beings: Lucifer and Ahriman. In
other venues concerned with these subjects, it is
often pointed out that while modern humanity likes
to believe in God, we often don’t bother to
believe in the Devil (for some thinkers, this is a
very big mistake to believe only in God and then
not believe in the Devil too).
One of the more
curious matters is that while many do not believe in
either the God or the Devil, the Devil clearly
believes in God (see the
story of Job in the Bible, or so I have been
led to believe. Mostly i'nI just practice the
Gospels, and leave the rest to historical
confusions).
This not believing in
the Devil (or Satan) lets him get away with a lot
of stuff he otherwise would not get away with.
The reality of the Dark Side (which we
are here exploring) is not at all like those spiritually
immature views that humanity has had for many
thousands of years - views which needed the words sin and
evil to mean something unclean.
Consider for a
moment, modern politics.
This political reality (as against the daytime
morality plays) has real world consequences that
flow from all the lies that live in this realm of
thoughts and actions. It is not without
serious consequences for us all that our
governments lie to us, and that those running for
President of the United States of America have so
much trouble with the truth. Or, worse
perhaps is that we like to live in the fantasy of
their lies because that fantasy world is more
comfortable than the reality we would otherwise
have to face.
Our lives are places
where life imitates art on a very huge scale.
The Daytime Drama is an escape in a way,
because we can turn it off, or ignore it, or
otherwise pretend there is some control over what
goes on there; while our actual lives are buried
under the rule of The Father of Lies - a real
spiritual Being determining much that happens to
us. Wars, financial woes, crimes inside and
outside government and corporate boardrooms, ...
the list is endless of real world consequences of
the fact that each individual is a place/gateway
where through
us evil
and or good enters the world, Or
not.
Good&Evil, ... is that a reality?
Light&Dark? Clean&Unclean?
Wicked? Sinful? Or does the "just
what is" have
more to it? What would be the point of human
suffering, a prime mystery for the Buddha,
if there was something fundamental we did not yet
know, or otherwise have forgotten?
Why bother to create an ~i~AM~, and then just
weigh it down with difficulties and trials?
Look again at the schematic, and its
geometry. A human being, as most every
mother&father knows, is something basically a
miracle. Does not the clearly free upper set
of 4 symbols rest upon a base obviously solid, as
well as aesthecially pleasing - an arrangement
artistic ...
~i~AM~
(A/d) < I-am > (L/d)
[human (d)]
We look out onto the
world and act on this world from out of these
interior realities, although we are simultaneously
surrounded by even higher powers, thus:
Christ Jesus
Guardian Angel
~i~AM~
[sense world < soul (A/d) < I-am > (L/d) soul > spiritual world]
human double
(asuras)
the Divine Mother
We choose what comes out of us into the world. The higher Divine Powers make for the world-order that enables us to individually be morally (both in a positive negative sense) creative - to be actors in our own Dramas (“...all the world’s a Stage...”). Part of the Mystery of Evil is that its main battleground is not out there in the world, but rather it is staged precisely where we can most directly effect it - in our own inner life of soul and spirit.
Here again is how Rudolf Steiner put it in a lecture in Lucifer and Ahriman, at page 21: “...the very purpose of our Fifth Post-Atlantean epoch is that man should become increasingly conscious of what takes effect through him in earthly existence”. [emphasis added]
For details on how this works on a world-wide social scale, refer once more to The Art of God: an actual theory of Everything. Here we are working not with the macro results of this structure, but with the personal and individual elements as appear within our own interior. The map is not the territory, and to best understand The Father of Lies we have to be self honest about our own lies. You could say that all the “secrets” of evil are within us, and that is where we will gain all our needed knowledge.
Then it is these
personal lies that we know best. The oddest
reality here returns us again to The Sermon on the
Mount and “judge not lest ye be judged”.
Christ advises us to learn first about
the Beam, in this case our own lies and lying.
Only after facing our own lies and lying can
we begin to help another with their Mote.
Once more there is a kind of fool’s skill to be learned: to forgive ourselves. It is hard to face our own lies and lying if we judge ourselves. In the self-reflective soul the problem of the Mote and the Beam exists as well. The Beam of our unjust inner judgment of our own self disables us from really being willing to acknowledge our own lies and lying. Instead, fearing our own “conscience’s” (our higher I’s) judgment, we hide from ourselves our own truth. This is why the Fifth Step of the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous reads: Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs. [emphasis added, ed.]
From Soap Operas were
are taught the webs we weave, when first we
practice to deceive. From politicians, we
see the consequences for the webbed-world of
operatic folly, in the name of What?
A lot of self-lies
take the shape of either ego-inflation, or
ego-deflation.
We make inner pictures of ourselves as
bigger and better or lesser and worse. It is
the luciferic double that encourages ego-inflation
(bigger and better) and the ahrimanic double that
encourages ego-deflation (lesser or worse).
The former tends to excesses of the euphoric
and the latter to excesses of the depressive.
When the physical body is defective in some
way, then the interface (the organ of the brain)
between the spirit/soul and the body is lamed
somewhat, and we get the phenomena: bi-polar or
manic depressive.
These are not
illnesses, as much as unusual relationships, of
the ~i~AM~ &&& the I-am, with
the threshold between the world of matter and the
world of spirit. Not everyone is the same
Inside, and the Narrow Gate to the world of spirit
is Inside Us - through and on the other side of
the dark. Joan of Arcadia, last episode, first
season: "learn to see in the dark" "trust the world
behind your eyes", and "go toward the
light" Joan
was produced by Barbara Hall, whose works
are well worth enjoying.
All the same, we are not our brains, nor is/are the maps provided by consciousness scientists even close to the actual territory - the experience of the school of hard knocks, and its remarkable companion, learning how to share the pain.
When
You Can’t Scream… Or 10 Reasons Why I Smoke
It is not something
wrong with us that we do go through such changes
of mood. It is merely very human. At
the same time there is a
huge problem with aspects of our modern culture,
which we might call the fields of psychology
and/or psychiatry. These forms of
knowledge carry within themselves the lie that we
as creatures of spirit and soul can be diseased.
It is not a conscious lie, although many
practitioners of these arts might inwardly have
qualms about what they do.
Much that happens to us in our souls and spirits is seen today as diseased, in part because the basic paradigm, natural science, is infused with what has to be called: the anti-Christ spirit. This spirit - this attitude of mind -denies the Father and the Son by believing there is only matter and there is no spirit. To the extent that the above two so-called healing professions believe a human being is only matter, and never spirit, we cannot be truly helped as we are not actually seen.
Bicycles:
a Children's Christmas Story for Adults
Let me take a couple
of cases in point, out of my own experience as
someone who spent almost two decades fighting in
the trenches of the field of mental health.
By trenches I mean I was never a
professional such as a nurse or doctor, but rather
someone who might be called a psychiatric aide or
a mental health worker.
At that level I
actually saw the patient more often and more
directly than did the professionals. If they
needed their bodies cleaned when they were
incontinent, I did it. If they needed
someone to sit with them in the middle of the
night while they fought the voices inside their
heads, I did it. If someone was to be
struck, it was me. If someone had to be
wrestled to the ground it was by me.
Of course there are
hundreds of thousands of us, fighting in these
trenches, for low pay and little recognition.
For us, such experiences grace us with
direct knowledge of what Christ taught with “the
washing of the feet”.
Case
One: hearing voices. We make the assumption
that when an individual reports “hearing voices”
that this is some kind of inner illusionary state
- there are no voices to be heard, according to
our cultural paradigms. We discount their
experience, often treating this experience has
having no possible meaning and as something to be
gotten rid of. A lot of what we today
call mental disease is actually very normal human
inner experience arising in a time in which the
“system” believes our inner life is not valid, and
the only way we are to be judged is by our outer
behavior
https://www.amazon.com/William-Bento/e/B001K810FK
https://www.amazon.com/Dennis-Klocek/e/B001KIXLWA/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1
Spiritual tradition
recognizes something called: the
threshold. This is the boundary
between ordinary consciousness and the spirit
world. Certain material dysfunctions in the
matter of the brain cause the “I” to have
un-wanted experiences across this “threshold” -
experiences of the spirit, for which the so-called
“insane” person is not prepared because our
culture does not recognize these experiences as
valid and real. These “involuntary”
spiritual experiences then represent an unusual
kind of karma and suffering we have yet to fully
appreciate.
Whenever we invalidate someones reported experiences, we place our judgment as superior to theirs. It is a hubris of the first order, as with only a little thought we would have to confess that we cannot see their inner world and have no idea of its real nature. Even to guess is flawed, although common. The fact is we hardly at all know our own inner life, so what makes us believe we are in a position to judge what is going on inside someone else?
Case Two:
intermittent explosive disorder (an example of the
flaws of the DSM system of diagnosis). The
Diagnostic Statistical Manual (going into its 5th
edition as I write this) asserts that psychiatry
can mimic physics - that is it can be scientific
using number relations. So diagnosis is
based upon lists of symptoms as definitions of
disease - a kind of check-off list. This is an
amazingly stupid idea, given that observation of
human beings is far more of an art than it will
even be a physical science. The drive to
mimic science kills the art. At present one
can find numerous discussions of how bad an idea
the latest DSM is on multiple levels. But
the insurance and pharmaceutical industries have
something to gain from this DSM, and they also
have sufficient social/political power to continue
to push this false paradigm on the rest of us.
Keep in mind that under Communism, the
Soviet Union routinely imprisoned people of
different political persuasions for fancied
psychiatric illnesses.
It used to be, when I
was growing up, that some people had what we
called bad tempers. They were socially
expected to get control of this tendency to
excess, and if they refused there were social
consequences, usually criminal. Now that
this is a DSM diagnosis (having a bad temper is
now called: intermittent explosive disorder) we have taken a path which treats
the person with this imaginary “disease” as no
longer responsible for their behavior. This
is a hugely dangerous tendency in modern society -
to apply deterministic causal thinking to matters
of inner life about which we really know
nothing. Our ignorance here is colossal, and
the social consequences of this ignorance
unimaginable.
*
Everywhere lies. Self lies, institutional lies. Lies to gain power. Lies to gain wealth. Lies to hide from our own truths about ourselves. If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. John 8: 31-32.
For a different
approach to the Divine Presence, "Strange Fire:
a
wizard's compendium of IDEAS in the
light of EROS
a self-illustrated
book, with commentary, ... on occasion,
beginning with A~Treatise~on~Physics
*
*
*
Even such a field of
study as Anthroposophy confronts within itself the
possibility of the lie. “One
must be able to confront an idea and experience it,
otherwise one will fall into its bondage.”
Rudolf Steiner, The
Philosophy of Spiritual Activity.
* * *
Marriage and Community
Certified
Copy is a
filmed tale of deep understanding: A man and
a woman meet, converse, and spend an afternoon
together in Italy. He appears to be an
English writer, she appears to be a possible fan.
The movie starts where he is giving a
lecture about his latest book: Certified
Copy. He is a
philosopher of art, it seems, and has written
about whether or not a copy of some art is as
artistically valid as the original piece.
The movie, following his apt introduction to his philosophical questions, seems to ask us if people are art and whether relationships are art. The film, being good art, works on multiple levels and heightens its effect by suggesting at midway a delightful mystery. Are these two, this man and this woman, actually husband and wife, and are their initial encounters where they seem to never have met, actually unfolding a special stage of development of their 15 year relationship, which includes a son?
The relationships of men to women, and women to men, have an import that, because of the scale, places all reproduction of new human avatar organisms, in the hands of irregular passions, very strange twists of fate, and discourses on male and female natures that have been going on for a long time, perhaps entering their twilight years - maybe the millennials will find a way through those age old mazes.
The movie also
demonstrates, less through concepts and more
through actions, a discourse on the differences
between male and female. He, ever the
philosopher, is most himself when he masters the
life of concepts and becomes able to define his
own life on those concrete terms. She lives
out of feelings, which as we know tend to the
mercurial.
His concept of the
healthy human being is as a kind of adult child,
free, spontaneous, living in the now. She
lives in the responsibilities of her relationships
- for example, as to her child she must be the
adult. While this can be cognitive, for her
this responsibility is something she mostly deeply
knows through her feelings - her heart - not just
her head.
Clearly to her, the
man is often just another child for whom she must
be the responsible person. He chafes under
her efforts to guide and cajole, resisting the
loss of freedom in the face of another person who
feels she must tell him what to think and how to
live.
Both desire to love
and be loved, and yet have not understood in
practice that one must learn to love the flaws of
the other as much as the more decent parts.
This ideal is given a spoken line in the
tale, but little action or dramatic
demonstration.
Late in the tale they
erupt into a fight in a public place - a
restaurant. What she sees as his
childishness frustrates her efforts to fix; and,
her intrusions into his life - a kind of excess of
mothering - frustrate his efforts to be true to
himself.
The film is very modern in its artistic appreciation of the drama in marriage of the collision between two individuals - in this case one male and one female. If I were a marriage counselor, I’d show the movie to a small group of married couples, and then over food, and perhaps drink, let them discuss it for several hours.
If I wanted to encourage wise
discussion of community, among a group
interested in living in close community, I’d
show them the movie The
Village,
by M. Night Shyamalan.
Part of the reason
for this discourse on marriage and community, in
cyber-intersection, is to point out the role art
can play concerning deep questions, whose reality
goes far beyond what is possible to consider even
in this kind of text. It is the role of art to raise good
questions, not necessarily to answer them.
These movies also
reveals how often we “judge”, and how those
consequences play out in marriages and communities.
*
*
*
“an Animalization through Dismembering of the Astral Body”
Rudolf Steiner
suggested one of the dangers coming toward
humanity was this: "an
animalization through dismembering of the astral
body". What
the heck does that mean?
Such a concept is a
kind of technical term of Steiner’s Spiritual
Science. It is one of four consequences of
future evolutionary developments, that might be
characterized as: the
continuation of the Fall. There are some interesting
(and challenging) philosophical-theological
questions here, but it is not my purpose to
explore them. I only want to point out a
particular contemporary phenomena which is, in my
experience, an aspect of these wider questions.
For some time a
certain kind of literature has become more
popular, even reaching beyond books, and now into
film and television. These are stories about
vampires and werewolves, in which their lives
occur as parts of extensive forms of fantasy
culture and also as containing admirable character
traits.
While a deeper analysis could be made, here we just need to notice how it is that this attractive set of fantasy pictures, in film and books, has enveloped the imagination of many young people. We need to know why.
People find today a
certain emptiness in their lives. Working at
a fast food restaurant, or in an office under an
abusive boss - all these instances the ~i~AM~/I-am
naturally finds undesirable. Since those who lead our civilization don’t
have a spiritual conception of the human being, they don’t know what to do to bring
about social health. Mostly what they do encourages social
dysfunction.
At the same time, the imagination is becoming more
powerful, but again our culture does not
understand how to teach about the imagination, so
that people can be pulled in certain directions
mostly out of instinct, rather than due to
conscious choices. While some can see this as a
terrible consequence, the reality is far more
complicated. Karma plays a deep role in
these changes, as does individual choices by the
~i~AM~/I-am during its sojourn in between
death and a new life.
Some of our young
walk toward their futures and find the coming
times filled with possibilities from which they
recoil in horror. They want passionate
engagement with life. They want to
feel themselves as more powerful. These
aspects of the desire-body (the astral body) for
greater sensuality and power are not unwarranted.
They dream dreams of power and sexuality and
passion and community.
There is a source to
these dreams, and their powers. Thousands of
years ago, the religions of the world were run
from Mystery Centers, where seers/initiations and
prophets, lived with spirits, and taught what
needed to be taught according to that more ancient
time. Gods&Goddesses were everywhere
recognized. The older Goddess religions were
also more practical, in a sense. The
arts&crafts worked visibly in the world of the
senses - people saw what was entirely
believable. There was a time when magic was
formidable, and not just fabulous trickery.
The monotheisms got rid of pagan magiks, and
fairy-worlds&workers. The Earth Mother
went into a kind of eclipse so that a culture
would arise that was free of belief in invisible
folks.
The life of the mind (our inner life) begins to become more attractive than the outer world of the senses. It would be a perceptual mistake for thinking to conceive that there are only certain ways in which one learns to come awake inwardly. Such retreats into fantasy are not without their quite valid consequences.
https://www.amazon.com/Vampires-Zombies-Werewolves-Ghosts-Supernatural/dp/0451531949
The fantasies about
werewolves and vampires, who have an animal nature
and magical powers, draw the imagination into the
interior of our lives. We will do well not
to assume this will turn out to be all bad.
Large portions of the world today, hold to ideas
of sorcery, spells, and curses. Even
politicians hold to vodoo trickledown economic
ideas, and that the invisible hand of the market
rules events capitalistic. The strangest
folks fancy they are capable of leading a nation,
and/or a people. Physics believes that stuff
is made of parts, and in spite of having spent
years of calculations and other re-renderings of
the world into/via very large instrumentations,
Cern has not proven any of the deeper micro cosmic
particles to exist. Theories are not working
out. The god-particle did not show
up.
in Cern, magnetic tech makes for interesting
mandalas
Again, we (if we want
to understand) need to keep in mind our Beam and
their Mote.
*
*
*
Multi-Player Internet Role-Playing
Games
a team sport seeking recognition as an
aspect of the Olympics ...
Here again is a
social phenomena that can be pre-judged and
mis-understood were we to only think about it in a
superficial fashion. As a result, when we
read in the Press about some doctor or scientist
talking about Internet addictions, or addictions
to games or to porn, we can have the idea that
someone who retreats from the so-called “real”
world is ill and needs to be fixed. That
idea is our Beam.
The truth is that in
many case not only is inner activity of the soul
heightened in much game play, but real world
skills are being produced. Take for example
multi-player role playing games of the “shooter”
type.
What happens in “real
life”? Several people from a wide variety of
physical locations come together in an imagined
world. While some can complain that
the visual imagination is too detailed (or
bloody), the fact is that the “meaning” of the
experience is the more intense part. An
emotional bonding arises among the game players,
one that may not be possible in their “real”
lives, because in those lives they don’t find
anyone who shares their interests.
Cooperation is required in order for the players to succeed - they can’t win on their own. Quick thinking is trained, and visual acuity in making important observations of the game environment is rewarded.
If one wants, its is
possible to go on the Internet and find deep
studies and thoughtful books about the real world
consequences of so-called “game play”. Keep
in mind that “play” is one of more profound ways
we learn, while flipping burgers for low pay,
under an abusive dominating boss, is not play -
its “work”, which we do in order to later be able
to “play”.
For a wonderful
literary journey into the intersections between
game “play” and the “real” world, read Neil
Stephenson’s latest novel: Reamde. The world has and is changing
rapidly as the Third Millennium dawns, and what
seems foolish to older people is quite likely
wisdom for younger people. God does work in
mysterious ways His wonders to perform.
the Age of the Dark God:
Ahriman
I’m trying to keep
this booklet short, but at the same time somewhat
complete - that is, not leave out matters that
need to addressed ... in the above I tried to give
a few examples of how to try to see past the Beam
- past our tendencies to quickly judge matters we
actually do not understand.
Now we need some
history in order to grasp deeper aspects of the
present.
The Persians
recognized two divine powers, a God of Light -
Ahura Mazda, and a God of Darkness - Angra
Mainyu (also know as Ahriman). Rudolf
Steiner used the name Ahriman in his works on
Spiritual Science, to refer to a macrocosmic
Being, who also appeared in the microcosmic (human
nature) world is a tendency in human beings. We called
part of this above, the ahrimanic double, or the
prosecutor. Yet, the main Way in which human
beings model themselves after Ahriman, is with
their intellect. Ahriman is cold, exact, and
callous (uncaring). The human intellect, if
not warmed by impulses of sympathy or empathy,
will make a cold, distant, calculation to pull the
trigger ignoring consequences obvious.
Steiner also referred to what he called: the Ahrimanic Deception. Ahriman, being the Father of Lies, through the human double was able to introduce, over time, into the cultural stream of Western Civilization a massive coordinated structure of lies or untruth following the Incarnation of Christ.
Why is Ahriman the
Father of Lies? Is it because he takes some
kind of human-like perverse pleasure in lying?
No.
Its because he can’t
see the truth. What is true or not is a
mystery to him. Like many of us the only
thing he observes in reality is the mirrored
picture of his own nature. He sees the rest
of the Creation, but only recognizes there what is
like him. He is, in his own one-sided
view, such an absolute perfection and power that
when he goes “mirror mirror on the wall, who is
the fairest maid of all” he sees only his own
nature.
Lucifer is different.
What he saw was human imperfection, found
that wanting, and in his pride believed we could
not become what was possible for us without bowing
to him. Recently
got his own television show.
Having no love, no
compassion and no humility, Ahriman can’t see
truth, and therefore can’t communicate truth
because he is perceiving only the warped mirrored
perfection of his own being and nature. This
is his attitude and it lives quite strongly in
present day natural science and in all religious
fundamentalism. This “materialism” then is
everywhere in this Age of Ahriman, which itself is
now marked by his incarnation. He has become
human for one lifetime, and lives now, at the time
that I write this, as a human being.
The writer of the John Letters (I and II) in the New Testament spoke of what he called “the anti-Christ spirit”, or an attitude which denied the Father and the Son. Natural Science lives fully in this “spirit” or attitude of soul when it decrees that the world is only matter and that there is no spirit. Religion too lives in this spirit when it takes its points of view (its theologies) and declares there is only one valid system of belief, and it is theirs (that particular religion’s). Not only that but the “system” becomes a set of “fixed” ideas - ideas without any Life in them. Life grows and develops and changes, and systems of ideas that don’t have life in them become fixed and only breed death into the souls of those who believe in them.
Physics proposes
only: matter and energy, but however - and with
great serious silly - insists that all be
measurable and countable. Since most of
human experience is qualitative, not quantitative,
physics, chemistry, and biology tend not to find
it, even though it stares out of the mirror at
them every morning.
Alice
and friends ....
The higher powers of
the Mother and the Son, loving us, let us live in
this arid cultural desert in order to experience
its existential emptiness (God is dead, some
declared). Ahriman serves us by creating his
“enchantment” of the mind (the attitude of the
anti-Christ spirit), which isolates us from each
other and drives us into ourselves in order to
pull out of ourselves the counter-spirit - the
spirit of Life. The Ahrimanic Enchantment is
meant to put us to sleep in our souls until such
time as we ourselves - within ourselves and among
ourselves - become the Prince that gives the Kiss
that awakens - what Steiner called the Christ
Impulse.
This is not meant to
be easy or without deep pain of soul and spirit.
Modern Life, within the individual
biography, must be excruciatingly real. Our
i-AM has to pull something out of itself
- it has to forge new meaning out of its own
creativity in life.
In the appendix I
have added some material available elsewhere, but
which in this text ought to be included without
those who read this having to go to another book.
From my book American
Anthroposophy is a
long essay on Ahriman’s 20th Century incarnation
and its meaning: Outrageous
Genius. As a
companion to that we have the Return of Christ in
the Ethereal (not in a physical body - but in the
spiritual plane where authentic thinking takes
place) and the story which leads us to our
personal understanding of the Second Eucharist in
the Ethereal which accompanies this Return: The
Meaning of Earth Existence in the Age of the
Consciousness Soul.
What this shows us is
that at the Dawn of the Third Millennium since the
Incarnation, a great battle has taken shape.
The Dark God Ahriman has incarnated in a
body, inside the Life of Rights in the United
States of America. This incarnation involved
a birth on December 25th, 1950 in a kind of
mockery of Christ’s own birth. It was
preceded by another mockery, a Star in the form of a horrible bomb
experimented on at Trinity site near Alamogordo
New Mexico, and then dropped on Japan near the end
of the Second Great War of the 20th Century.
In this same Century
it became possible for human beings to experience
Christ’s Return in the Ethereal - the ancient
Persian polar-opponents even more intimately
involved in human affairs. Yet the
battlefield is not earth existence itself, but
rather the inwardness of the human being. We
let in (or not) the Force, the moral power of the
human being, by the choices of our own I, as the
American story teller George Lucas intuited years
ago in the original Star Wars. We take the
hero’s journey, or fall into the dark side.
At the same time we
have our Yoda’s and our Obi Wan Kenobi’s - our
Rudolf Steiner’s and our Valentin Tomberg’s.
In Outrageous Genius I name Ahriman’s earthly incarnation, but do not do that here, because unless we fully understand the context, and as well realize that the social-political world is in fact the leading edge of the Creation, we will not appreciate what is at stake, or why Ahriman is not only not unclean, but is in point of fact a kind of spiritual teacher.
Recall once more our
symbol set:
Christ Jesus
Guardian Angel
i-AM
[sense world < soul (A/d) < I-am > (L/d) soul > spiritual world]
human double
(asuras)
the Divine Mother
In the center is the fallen human being - the <I-am>. Surrounding that is the coordinated might of great spiritual powers, whose full existence means via Love to make possible the <I-am>'s eventual freely chosen goal to either rise up, via the some kind of path on the upper vertical, or to descend into the deeps of earth existence on the lower vertical, where we learn to integrate the double into our selves and into our world view. Neither path is better, and the biography itself can contain elements of both.
falling
back to earth wounded,
maybe dying
Another marker of
this Dawn of the Third Millennium is the
metamorphosis (dying and becoming) of Western
Civilization. As I explain in detail in my
book The Art of God: an
actual theory of Everything, there is profound order in the
social-political existence of humanity. In
fact, the Creator God - named Christ in our time
(in more ancient times the Creator had more
ancient names), is Embodied in this Organism of
the Social-Political World. We live,
literally, inside the Divine, surrounded and
buoyed up by this Love.
There is no detail of
our existence which is outside this Love, although
a whole book was required to even hint at the
nature of this order/organism in which we unfold
our biographies. An especially important
theme in that book is that: even
conflict has meaning.
The present day social chaos is necessary so
that our individual “i-AMs” are confronted with fully real and
existential crises from which we may not escape.
The outcome (of the
choices) in those moments of crisis is not
ordained, for our freedom is essential. At
the same time, each biography has its own needs,
and as regards moral dilemmas there are no moral
absolutes that all must follow, for that would
take away our freedom to choose. Thus, the
Third Millennium begins with an immense social
dysfunction that is required in order for each
individual to face their particular moments of
inner pain and doubt. Only in this way is
the “i-AM” challenged to pull out of its own
nature that which can arise in no other fashion.
There are no
accidents.
Simultaneously, ...
each world view is necessary for each individual.
That one human being is born a Muslim and
lives in Pakistan, and fights in a war against the
West, is the intellectual and mental context in
which their particular biography is to unfold.
That another human being lives in North
Dakota, and has become a confirmed new atheist, is
for them the needed paradigm through which they
see the world of their individual biography.
While there are universal truths, there is no need for any biography to find them, for they will have precisely what they need for their personal biography, and the arguments of many - setting religion at odds with science, is just part of various individual contexts. Love cares not about whether we have the right point of view, but rather whether we have the experiences we most need in this particular life.
however seeming
frivolous&pointless ... silly used to mean
possessed by the sacred ....
In this sense then,
Ahriman’s incarnation, and Christ’s Return in the
Ethereal, are mere details. Even my books
are tiny ripples, mostly isolated in the vast
oceanic streams that are the totality of Earth
Existence. What Steiner called the Age of
the Consciousness Soul is to run from about 1400
to 3500 AD. The dominate reality for
that Age is the Rite of the
Mystery of Evil, an
event taking place in the World Temple that is
Earth Existence, and for each participant the
meaning of all of this belongs to them to
determine. What I think is irrelevant for
most.
Love fully
individualizes this Rite - it has only structural
universal significance - i.e. we can name it and
describe it, but no participant needs to know
either that name or that description.
At the same time,
this is also the Age of Science, which is marked
by a search for universal truths. As a
consequence, certain thinkers add to human
spiritual knowledge during the course of such
events, in the same way that those doing research
on biology add bit by bit what they can derive
from their own investigations. A street
child in Bombay has no need for this knowledge,
for Love will see to it that all that s/he needs
s/he will receive.
The Rolling Stones
had it right: “you
don’t always get what you want, but if you try
real hard, you’ll get what you need”.
Or, as Christ said: “Ask
and you will receive; look and you will find; knock
and you will be admitted”.
*
*
*
presently being revised, watch out for ganja based
pot holes in the below
appendix one
from the book American Anthroposophy
the spirit of the four directions
[A
brief introduction to the neophyte: For some it will come as a strange
surprise (perhaps quite off putting) to find this
book begin with the following discussion
concerning the present day incarnation of a
spiritual Being of whom they have perhaps never
heard anything. Ahriman is apparently first known
to outward history as a figure in Persian
religious myths. Rudolf Steiner discussed this
Being in great detail, and represented both human
nature and the general structure of the social
world as being threefold in its most universal
all-human characteristics. As represented
artistically in Steiner’s sculpture: the
Representative of Humanity, we find above was
Lucifer, who stood between the human being and his
experience of the divine spiritual worlds. Below
was Ahriman, who stood between the human being and
his experience of the world of the senses. In the
Middle, as the balancing gesture, stood Christ as
the
Representative of Humanity (what our true higher nature is to
become, as St. Paul had noted: Not
I, but Christ in me).
This arrangement should be viewed as something not easy to understand and as something that needs to be
approached carefully and without succumbing to any
temptations to sensationalize or exaggerate the
real nature of Mystery of Evil, the
main social-structural Mystery surrounding
humanity in the present.
This much should be
recognized. The social world consists of two
parts, the first of which is an outer structural
aspect - a Stage Setting, the maya of nature ~!~
<dancingwith> ~!~ history
and social-political facts&processes.
Here in this outside structure Ahriman is a main feature
(recall above diagrams: sense-world
A/d]. As we know, in tooth and claw,
Nature is dangerous, untamed, wild. Yet, all
aboriginal wisdoms knew that Nature taught, and it
taught harsh lessons to those who did not pay
attention. The Ahrimanic is Some Of the Laws
of the dark/wild/dangerous side of nature, which
the Creator made lawful from the beginning.
The Laws, which include/lean-toward Death
... Humanity wrestles with Nature, and
Nature always wins, so maybe its time to stop
arguing, and ask with please and thank yous, for a
better understanding of Her, ... Her message about
Ahriman is simple: he's always welcome home for
tea&sympathy, remains the brightest of Her
children, a Star ~!~ in his own right Pure/Innocent/Geometry the Love of
numbers by Number itself. Just keep in mind
that counting is interesting/fascinating (as Spock
well knew), yet coloring outside the lines is
erotic, a wild power to Vulcans.
The
Theoretic Arithmetic of the
Pythagoreans
by Thomas Taylor.
More essential is the inwardness, what is not visible to the senses.
All our outer actions (and inner actions) have a
consequence for our soul and spirit. This
inwardness is not maya, but truth. But to arrive
at truth requires a rite of
passage. The governor of this rite of
passage is Lucifer. As we progress in inner
development, we come to learn that the real
essential aspect is Christ. He is the predominant
feature of the truth of the inner world (Lucifer
commands an inner world of temptation and
illusion, while
Christ is
the Way, the Truth, and the Life - what receives our
approach (the Way), in the middle becomes the means
(the Truth) leading us through this rite of passage
to its culmination (the Life).).
~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~!!~ ~!~ ~!~
As
the essay below progresses, certain facts about
this structural Mystery will be illuminated, and
other related facts will come forward as the
reader gets deeper into the rest of this work.
The neophyte, who wants to go further into this
Mystery - particularly what is called: the
opponents, may
want eventually to read Steiner’s works on the
subject of Lucifer and Ahriman very carefully.]
The follow material is basically a rather long
footnote, in two parts, usable for scholars or
folks with aggressive curiosity ...
appendix one
Outrageous Genius - Discovering
the in-the-Present Incarnation
of Ahriman in America
through
the
Signs of the Times
first, some necessary preliminary
considerations
Honoring the Teacher and the Teaching
“And,
just as there was an incarnation of Lucifer in the
flesh, and as there was an incarnation of Christ in
the flesh, so will there be, before
even a
part
of the third post-Christian millennium will have
passed, an actual incarnation
of Ahriman in the West: Ahriman in the flesh.” [emphasis added] R.S. lecture, 1
November, 1919
“The
thing that will matter, though, will be for people
in the age of Ahriman to know that John William
Smith* is only what appears before them outwardly,
and that inwardly Ahriman is there; they
must know what is happening and not succumb to any
deception in the drowsiness of their illusions.” [emphasis added] R. S. 28 December
1919 [*a name Steiner made up]
context is everything,
i.e.
The Times
need to be well understood
The first and
essential thing to realize is that in thinking
about the Incarnation of the near-god Ahriman, as a human being on the cusp of the change from the
2nd Millennium to the 3rd, we must not conceive of
this as an incarnation of Evil.
All of us are incarnations, and all of us are
equal on the plane of incarnate existence.
Equal, ... so Ahriman incarnate is wrapped up in
the same dramas of want&folly as the rest of
us, and like all the skills potential in human
beings, this person is gifted at birth, like any
artist. Sure for some, we will choose
not-to-like him, or blame him, or otherwise use
him as an excuse for our own peculiarities.
He had stuff to solve, and Life itself weighed and
measured him in Ways only he apprecicates.
He made mistakes, got things wrong, and still set
in motion something we will have to live with - a
system for controlling the dissemination of
truth.. Not just the absence of truth -
rather the anti-truth, which annialates both when
they are in contact with each other. Trump
is his child, but still Ahriman's story must be
grasped, because we have within us the same gift:
intellect. Except in him, there is not the
ability to moderate this penetrating intellect
with the hear; and, his intellect is of the
highest order.
What Rudolf Steiner has called the “opponents” play a necessary and ordained role
in the Creation. They are the density and weight
we are to meet and learn to carry (in both the
inward heavenly realm as well as the outward
earthly realm), otherwise our own incarnations
would be too easy, and we would never really learn
anything.
Macro Evil (the opponents) are different from the Beast
from the Abyss, or
collective and conscious micro (human) evil. The
tempters and confusers tempt and confuse, they sow
seeds of fear and doubt and judgment and cynicism,
but they do not bring true evil into the social
world. We
do that
when we give into their urgings, instead of the
wise (though challenging and often difficult)
promptings of our own hearts. The more consciously
we choose the dark, the more the Beast
from the Abyss has
free play in human social existence. The more we
consciously seek and choose the Good, the more
evolution moves forward in a balanced and
harmonious direction.
Or not. Is the
essence of the Mystery of Evil that it - evil - does
not exist? No. the Mystery is what
we do - how we participate in existence, knowing
full well that the wild is good as well as the
car3fully groomed and ordered.
How is it that we can
do that? How is it that human beings can
apparently kill the life sphere of a whole
planet? That we humans can eradicate species,
and even ourselves, ... for what purpose does that
possibility even exist?
“...the very purpose of our Fifth Post-Atlantean epoch is that man should become increasingly conscious of what takes effect ~!~ through him in earthly existence.” [emphasis added] R.S. Lucifer and Ahriman, lecture II, 2 November 1919.
Some anthroposophists
create pictures within their inwardness, in which
they view the opponents as more or less extremely
powerful, and thereby capable of overwhelming
humanity (especially in connection with the hardly
spoken of Soradt - the Sun Demon - and the
Asuras). Simple logic refutes such an assumption,
for if these Beings had the power some
anthroposophists believe they have, progressive
evolution would already be over. The fact is they
are constrained, principally through the office of
the Divine Mother, whose golden realm is found on
the other side of the Eight Inner Spheres of the
Earth (the Spheres of the Fallen Hierarchies). As
we more and more become able to do research into
the Feminine Mysteries (something Steiner could
only hint at in order not to get caught up in the
web of the Mary Cult of European Catholicism), we
will discover that there is not only a male
trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), but also a
feminine trinity (Mother, Daughter and Holy Soul).
Steiner could only point out to us a few facts
about this golden realm, and also the significance of the
return of the Imagination (the Holy Sophia) and as
well the significance of Anthroposophia. Some of
the best present-day research on the Divine Mother
can be found in Tomberg’s Meditations
on the Tarot, in
the 11th Arcanum: Force. It is through Hell to the realm of the Holy Mother (the
Eight Inner Spheres of the Earth) that Christ
descended on the Saturday following His
crucifixion, whereby he obtained the forces
necessary for resurrection. [See Proverbs viii,
22-30 for some hints.]
More detail will be
developed on this problem in my essay below: The
Mystery of Macro and Micro Evil: the relationship of
the Shadow (the three-fold double-complex) to the
American Soul,
wherein knowledge of the Shadow obtained after 35
years of introspection will be described. This
much can be said presently: Ahriman and Lucifer
enter directly into human affairs through
us - through our
giving into the Shadow, the three-fold
double-complex. We are the gate by which the
effects of the opponents enter the world social
order. In a like fashion, it is also only through
us that Christ (and
the Divine Mother - but that is, as noted above, a
whole other theme) can directly enter into the
social order.* The Fifth Cultural Epoch (the Age
of the Consciousness Soul) is the era in which
greater and greater aspects for the responsibility
for earthly social affairs falls to human beings.
*[Obviously, both
Christ and the Divine Mother appear sometimes to make a physical contact
with individuals in various forms. This is one of
the means through which they influence a
particular time, but still this is always done
with great respect for human freedom, and still
keeps to the same rule: the influence enters the
social world through us. The recipient of such effects is
not made into a passive tool in any sense of that
word.]
Ahriman in reality is
a gift to humanity, a two-edged gift to be sure,
but a real treasure. His very onesidedness teaches
us, and this is teaching we need to face squarely,
for it not only teaches us about ourselves, but
also about an essential aspect of the real nature
of the Creation. We all contain within our souls
the ahrimanic potential, the possibility to be
calculatingly cold and heartless, and if we are as
brutally self honest as our conscience would
encourage, we have all made and will make
judgments that have such a quality - that are,
from a human perspective, callous and indifferent.
Do we not walk
through the world turning a blind eye away from
all manner of suffering and pain, fully aware that
we do this in order to preserve our self interest,
our comfort and our far easier lives?
To fill out this
picture, think on Nature. In tooth and claw, in
flood and earthquake, in all that seems as powers
of death and radical sudden change, we see in the
processes of Nature what appears as an absence of
either compassion or love. The Natural World (as
against the Social World*) is a world of profound
and complicated laws, which seem in their results
to have not at all the same consciousness that one
human being might bear, out of compassion and
love, toward another. In this indifferent power of
Nature and nature’s lawfulness, lives Ahriman as
he manifests as an aspect of the sense world.
*[From another point
of view this distinction, separating the mineral,
plant and animal kingdoms from the human kingdom,
does not work. But we have different purposes
here, if the reader will accept that reality (as
Steiner himself pointed out) is frequently
paradoxical. Our bodies are of this Nature, but
our Spirit, in its freedom, stands outside those
rules. See Owen Barfield’s remarkable book Worlds
Apart to explore
some of the logical problems here in a deeper
way.]
Yes, Nature (as meant
here) contains beauty - it is a divine work of
art, but in its processes and laws it is basically
finished, fixed and complete. It is essentially
done. That human beings may in the future have the
possibility of lifting Nature up out of this fixed
and finished condition is a whole other story.
That Anthroposophy can yet teach humanity
mysteries of Nature unimagined by today’s mankind
is a necessary step in laying the groundwork for
this lifting up. Humanity must learn to truly see,
and it is a mission of Anthroposophy to enable
this seeing. All the same, Nature is Created (past
tense), in which the last act was the arising of
thought. “Thought is the last
member of a series of processes by which Nature is
formed” [emphasis
added] R.S. A Theory of
Knowledge Implicit in Goethe’s World Conception. This is why the path of
Anthroposophy is a path of cognition. To see the
real secrets of Nature requires the metamorphosis
of thinking, a task not as well advanced as it
should be in anthroposophical culture (more
later). What we haven’t truly understood in
practice, we cannot teach.
Our social-political
world has almost completely emancipated itself
from Nature. As we more and more developed, we
more and more separated away from Nature, so that
today the Social World is a world essentially all
of its own, in which callous indifference and compassion and love operate along
side each other. The Social World has out of
instinct come to sit astride the Natural World,
using it for our egoistic benefit. We can now
choose whether to continue that course, whether to
continue to embody dominion
over or to
transform and metamorphose that into communion
with (see my book the
Way of the Fool).
We can go to sleep and let raw animality (callous
indifference and appetite) rule us (instead of us
ruling it), or we can wake up.
Ahriman in entering
into our world confronts other powers than those
which would be normal to his realm - his usual
place in the Creation. As a human
being he
now enters this world of choice, not of
essentially fixed processes and laws.
Part of what bothers
us, and will bother us about this Cosmic Being,
now to be seen as a human individual, is not how
much he has done that we see as wrong, but how
much he is just like a certain part of us. For
example, many people have and will in the future
like and admire this individual. Even so, as a
human being, to the extent that he does evil, he
does it as a human being. Elements of his cosmic
powers are restrained by being incarnated, just as
are ours.
In addition, recall
that Rudolf Steiner explained how our antipathy to
another really acquires its strength and passion
from the fact that we semi-consciously know just
how much we ourselves are like that which we
observe in others as failings. Ahriman incarnate
is a mirror to a common human failing, a failing
to which everyone living today in the world is
prone. If we want to avoid this, we must strive to
know the true nature of our heart, and at the
higher levels of inner development, think our way
to an experience of the Ethereal Christ. This
requires us to work properly and consciously at
soul metamorphosis, and not just whine and
complain about how awful the world is, and about
how much everyone but us is wrong, evil and dumb.
It is also important
to realize that Ahriman incarnates in a specific
place and time in order to accomplish something as
a more or less ordinary human being (with
extraordinary intelligence - one-sided
spirit-thinking) he can only achieve at this
specific place and time. Outside the social world
of incarnate human beings, the cosmic power
Ahriman can only do certain limited things, and
these mostly indirectly through our Shadow (the
three-fold double-complex). Inside
the Social World, when with us as a human being,
he can do directly things he was unable to do
before.
All the same, to act
directly on the world, as a member of the social
order, he must still surrender some of his
capacities - some of his genius, that is operate
as a extremely gifted human being, not as a nearly divine power
incarnate (what in ancient times might have been
called an avatar).
In this, Ahriman’s
teaching is harsh - it is not for wimps, and his
influence on our social existence is necessarily
profound, regardless of how dark we may be tempted
to seek to portray it. A cosmic power is on the
earth living as a human being, and this is a power
that can only be called Outrageous
Genius.
Ahriman also belongs to America (the true West),
in the same way Lucifer belonged to the East and
Christ to the Center. American anthroposophists
need to recognize that he is ours. Our
materialistic society, mostly of our own making
through our choices in terms of comfort and
appetites, is ahrimanic because we opened the door
to his influence and have benefited from it. For
example, we have computers and all that goes with
this electronic world, because of him. The genius
of cold heartless calculation provides many gifts,
and we have had to become awash in it - buried up
to our necks in it - so that we will soon be
forced to decide whether or not we really want it
to rule us, or us to rule it.
Our task then in
coming to knowledge of this power is to recognize
a part of ourselves in its nature, and to also
understand how fine and exact is the shape this
power seeks to give to our social life. This
shape, crafted by outrageous genius, can tell us a
great deal. In so doing it reveals to us, we who
would foster the good - that is we who would be
balanced instead of so extremely one-sided - just
what we need to do and how we need to act in the
social world to bring into that world just the
healing that is needed. Ahriman would overbalance
the world in a certain direction, and it will be
up to that portion of humanity, willing to be
awake to him consciously, or instinctively, to
strive to restore this balance.
In a peculiar sense,
he also points directly at the true Second Coming,
as began in its initial ethereal world dynamics in
the years 1933 to 1945, by pointing so strongly
away from it. He (Ahriman) comes to distract us,
to move us away from our true heart, and this is
his temptation - to cause us to loose ourselves in
the world of the senses, and never look within at
the own soul and discover what lies there, for as
Christ told us in Luke: “the
kingdom of heaven is within you”. Ahriman would have us be so
absorbed in the Stage Setting, that we never
notice that the real battlefield is within - that
is: It
is within this inner battlefield of soul that we
as individuals act most powerfully as creative
authors in the Play.
Yet, by this very
distraction and its strength, he points the other
way. He speaks into our lives and says to us: go
here, for you will like it, for all your lower
impulses will find there their satisfaction. He
wants to pull us down into too much
self-gratifying gravitas. Even the excess of
seriousness in anthroposophical circles tends to
have this ahrimanic character. We have to engender
the counter-levity out of our selves. We have to
overcome the cold-hearted and calculating
materializing lower senses tendency in our soul
that otherwise remains sub-conscious, and replace
that with the ethereal forces of consciously
moralized thought. Only our wills can do this, and
we have incarnated just in this time precisely to
learn this lesson and to accomplish this task,
which Rudolf Steiner has called: the unfolding of
the Consciousness Soul.
Moreover, if we learn
to perceive the real dynamics of social existence
correctly, we will see that already, in spite of
Ahriman’s incarnate activities, we have been
instinctively engaged in much that is already
transforming the worst that he would accomplish
were we not to learn to understand his teaching.
We are learning even
now from
this teaching how to make its countering healing
gesture. Everywhere there is a waking up, and now
it is time for Anthroposophy to step forward and
find a way to serve the world’s hunger to wake up
all the way. However, first we need to rouse
ourselves by facing the mirrored shadow of our
worst qualities as these manifest not just in
American and World Culture, but more importantly,
as an absolutely necessary crucial first step, in
American (and world-wide) Anthroposophical Culture.
Were we simply to
look at the outer culture, without first looking
inwardly and squarely at ourselves, we will fail
utterly. We must meet the Shadow in ourselves or
we will be nothing but the hypocrites to which
Christ referred when he said in Matthew 23: 25-28:
“Woe
to you canon-lawyers and Pharisees, you fakes, for
cleaning off the rim of your cup and saucer while on
the inside you’re bursting with greed and wild
appetites. Blind Pharisee, wash out the inside of
the cup and saucer first, if you want the outside to
end up clean! Woe to you canon-lawyers and
Pharisees, you fakes, for being like dusty monuments
that look pretty on the outside but on the inside
are full of the bones of corpses and all kinds of
rot. You likewise from the outside appear to the
world to be decent, but inside you’re full of
hypocrisy and ways around the law”.
It is the thesis of
this essay then that Ahriman incarnated in the
West in the latter part of the 20th Century, and
that his activity as an incarnated human being can
be found in various phenomena of social existence.
He leaves/left a trail, as it were, in events that
mark his passage, and this paper means to discover
that trail, and mark that passage, so that we know
who he is/was and what he did, and can then begin
to counter-balance this influence. Not erase it,
or eliminate it, but consciously counter-balance
it. Moreover, we must start to look also at its
examples that are nearest at hand in our Society
and Movement (a great deal in the collection of
essays that follows does this). We look outwardly
to understand it, and then inwardly to correct it;
for we have nothing to teach anyone about this if
we have not first understood it, and mastered it
within ourselves and within our own circles.
Anthroposophists are faced in this trial - of coming awake to Ahriman’s Incarnation - by the problem of the mote and the beam on a very large scale (See Matthew: Chapters 5-7).
Those wanting to
consider more details, as regards the indications
of Rudolf Steiner, are encouraged to read and
ponder the essay in the appendix to the book: The
Future is Now: Anthroposophy at the New Millennium, which appendix was called: When
did Rudolf Steiner Expect the Incarnation of
Ahriman? by
Hans-Peter van Manen. This is, of course, in
addition to the obvious books Steiner wrote
specifically on Lucifer and Ahriman.
In order to fully
appreciate this incarnation of a near-god, we have
to have a proper inner picture of modern existence
- to learn to perceive that Earth Events also have
Cosmic Meaning. What can seem to some, to be
merely historical confusion and social evil, has
to be perceived by the anthroposophical living
picture thinking as Divine Drama, in which certain
unusual Actors enter Stage Left, cross the Stage,
and leaving behind their Effects exit Stage Right.
I use the term Actors, because Ahriman does not
incarnate alone - many others are drawn to this
place and time precisely because of the unique
characteristics Ahriman has stamped upon it.
We also need to ask
good questions about where to look. Do we look in
the Cultural Sphere that is: Religion, Art or
Science, or in the Economic Sphere (Production,
Distribution and Consumption), or in the Life of
Rights (State, Media, People)? Where would Ahriman
work?
I am going to suggest
the Life of Rights, because if we read Steiner’s The
Inner Aspect of the Social Question, we will come upon the understanding
that while the Cultural Sphere and the Economic
Sphere have spiritual world counterparts, the Life
of Rights is completely Earthly. It is our Earthly
existence to which Ahriman wishes to bind us
(while Lucifer would take us to a world of
unearthly and illusory spirit). Nonetheless,
nothing here should be taken to confine the reader
to coming to a different understanding.
Why the Life of
Rights?
Humanity now
possesses considerable freedom with respect to the
happenings in the human social life of the Earth,
as well as with regard to our relationship to the
natural world. We can build bombs that we believe
make a small sun of death inside a city. We can
alter biological life in ways we can’t predict out
of an almost cultivated arrogant ignorance
(callous indifference). We can consciously spread
horrible diseases, perhaps killing all human life,
all animal life, all plant life.
We can also control
the economy by the hidden secret levers behind the
issuance and management of currencies, and then
using the power that this concentrated wealth can
buy, the holders of these hidden levers subvert
politicians and media outlets so as to hold great
temporal power in a few hands, which hands cannot
be challenged or often even named. A secret cabal
tries to rule mankind, and seems to direct through
money (stones into bread) most of the scientific research of
our great industries. All this inside a world view
dominated by ideas and concepts that make little
or no room for the reality of Spirit. All to what
end?
At this climatic
point in world history, one Nation State is
behaving as if it is the main center of political,
economic and technological power - the United
States of America. The entire social and natural
spheres of earth existence are spread out before
this power like live prey waiting to be devoured
(Americans literally consume far far more than a
fair share of the world’s wealth). Since the
United States Government is a nexus of these
powers, those who seek to rule from out of the
economic and financial circles still must work through the Life of Rights.
If then someone were
to be inside this nexus of power conduits, they
would be able to sit astride all those flowing
streams of power running from the economic, and
the cultural (as in that which is controlled by
corporations - television and movies etc. and also
the dangerous oversight of the State in education)
in and through the Life of Rights - the middle
Sphere of the emerging Threefold Social Organism.
Recognize also that
of the threefold nature of the Life of Rights
(State, Media, People - see my essay Waking
the Sleeping Giant: the Mission of Anthroposophy in
America http://ipwebdev.com/hermit/wkslg.html),
these streams of power are currently dominated by
the State alone.
We could place then
Ahriman’s human incarnation right inside the
current Bush II Administration and not be far off
the mark in our efforts to see if some kind of
heartless calculating force is/was radiating from
there outwards into the political life of the
United States, tilting it and the world in certain
directions. We should also expect that Ahriman
will not incarnate alone, but will bring with him
(or along side him) those who have some karma to
work out with respect to such Genius. His cold
calculating genius does not need to be perceived
as just localized in him, but needs to be seen as
distributed - as spread out among many many
individualities around or near him (and also
throughout the world).
We also need to
recognize that there will be those intimately
within these circles (although more will be
outside), who oppose him and these tendencies.
Christ is the Lord of Karma, and through His Art
as the arranger of the relationships of all human
biographies, He has allowed in the circles around
Ahriman not merely his closest allies, but also
those who have the remarkable strength needed to
thwart much that he would otherwise like to
achieve. Michaelic warriors will be right next to
those who have chosen to be the Dragon’s earthly
spawn.
Moreover, Ahriman has
no need to hold directly any reins of temporal
power, for the use of such power is not his
genius. His genius is to see how number
relationships can be gripped and thus give an
excessive strength of fixed-like order to the
normal living and fluid nature of social
existence. He knows better than anyone, human or
divine, what power lives in number, and earthly
temporal power has no attraction to him at all.
second, a presentation of the relevant
context in the form of a contemplation on the social
organism
The Wise Earth* as Counter-force to
Ahriman’s Incarnation
*c.f. Paul Hawken’s
http://wiseearth.org/
We need now to
revisit the above themes, but from an even higher
and more picture-like level. It is important for
the reader to realize that our conventional
conceptual frame of reference as regards
political-social themes, in particular the Life of
Rights, does not adequately take account of the
related spiritual reality. To speak or think of
the political-social using the same terminology as
conventional media is to “materialize” our mental
pictures, concepts and ideas. In this next section
I will endeavor to help the reader overcome these
habits of mind.
First, we should step
back a little, and see if we can see earthly
events in the more mythic or imaginative form.
Events in the social organism are also a story, or
perhaps better said a Cosmic Tale as it were. Just
like nature speaks in its appearances, so does the
logos nature of Christ speak into social events,
which He artistically arranges through His role as
Lord of Karma (see my essays below:
The Meaning of Earth Existence in the Age of the
Consciousness Soul;
and, The Methodology
Necessary for a New Social Science).
Picture the surface
of the Earth sphere, that narrow spherical
physical band in which unfolds all the visible
phenomena of human lives and cultures. Literally,
dear reader, consciously form this picture of a
huge spherical band, perhaps only twenty miles in
height, that at its upper limits is airless space
(beyond which we cannot breath), and at its lower
limit solid near impenetrable rock. Six billion
plus people spread over the surface of the Earth,
all held dear by the Divine Mystery. Waves of
change move through this sphere
of social existence,
which in the 20th Century became truly global
economically, at the same time it became more
self-aware globally (via the Internet). In fact, if
we think away the mental pictures we have of this
world that are derived from the senses, and begin
to substitute more imaginative, more fluid and
dynamic pictures of the social world as the
interplay of downward and upward flowing will
forces of Cosmic Beings, in which the human being
moves through fields* of thinking, feeling and willing
born in the hierarchies, we will come closer to
the truth. The apparently material earth sphere,
in which the social world seems to have
emancipated itself from Nature, is in fact a nexus
of dynamic and inter penetrating cosmic spiritual
activity. Rudolf Steiner gave us a very necessary
picture of this activity, when he said that “man
was the religion of the Gods”.
There is a reason so much activity is directed
from the Cosmic Spiritual Heights and from the
Earthly Spiritual Depths, at this in
between center - at
this narrow material-like spherical band where
human beings unfold their biographies. The
Hierarchies conceive of us as their religion,
because inside us, in the i-AM, that is the human
spirit, exists something that can’t be found
anywhere else. Rudolf Steiner wrote of this in his
youth, in A Theory of
Knowledge Implicit in Goethe’s World Conception:
“Man
is not behaving in accordance with the purposes of
the Guiding Power of the world when he investigates
one or another of His commandments, but when he
behaves in accordance with his own insight. For
in him
the Guiding Power of the world manifests Himself.
He does not live as Will somewhere outside of man;
He has renounced his own will in order that all
might depend upon the will of man.” [emphasis added]
*[See the lessons of
the First Class of the School of Spiritual
Science.]
We are the father and mother of all
human action.
Within the
consciousness of these many billions of human
beings, whose true mystery we are hardly ready to
acknowledge, exists struggles, which we call in
general the Evolution of Consciousness. In the
current phase of this evolution, which we call the
time of the Consciousness Soul, the I seeks to
awake in the encounter with other I’s. Within the
soul, moral challenges appear out of these
encounters, as each biography confronts its
necessary karma and destiny. First, as if
radiating outward in waves from the Western
Democracies (where individualism is most fully
developing), while at the same time appearing
homeopathically in smaller communities world-wide,
the Consciousness Soul begins its unfolding. From
out of the totality of the invisible inner world
of humanity the I faces both outer and inner
challenges (for the most part lost from the
insight of our thinking in an inner darkness of
coagulated concepts, such as rigid and arid
religious beliefs, or a spiritless materialistic
natural science, or even to the Anthroposophical
Society and Movement via the intellectualization
during the 20th Century of the Michaelic Cosmic
Intelligence).
Meanwhile, unknown to
most, the Christ works in
between. He is able
to work in between because having arranged our
karma - our integrated and finely interrelated
biographies - to the extent that our social
relationships are informed with moral qualities
(even the most tentative impulses of the heart),
these moral acts in the Epoch of the Consciousness
Soul also amount to an encounter with the Eternal.
In that we seek the Good, and draw even a weak tea
intuition of it into our social relationships,
Christ can be present precisely because of that
qualitative vertical inner gesture we make in our
souls in order to seek knowledge of the Good in
the dramas of the moral challenges in modern life.
(For every one step in
spiritual development, we must take three steps in
character - moral - development)
In the outer stage
setting, which we believe we know through our
materialized conceptions of present world history,
itself a kind of polar opposite to the inner world
of spiritual awakening and moral challenge,
gestures of change seek to warp the slowly
unfolding threefold social organism to their own
uses and needs. A Dark Prince of the World seeks
to dominate the Stage, while the Lord (Artist) of
Karma weaves the biographies into a musical-like
harmony of inner conscious spirit evolution. The
I, under the influence of Christ, tends to become
We. While we, under the influence of Ahriman, are
pushed to remain only I. [The Rastafarians - a
mostly now Jamaica based religious impulse -
speaks interesting enough of the idea of I
‘n I - we - as
something different from the idea of I
and you. The idea
of I and you comes from the devil, according to
their instinctive wisdom, while the truth is that
we are both I’s - that is we are the same, “I
‘n I”.]
Ahriman divides
communities into smaller and smaller groups,
ultimately to become isolated I’s. Christ unifies
I’s into communities through His in
between support of
the healing resolution of our karmic moral
challenges.
Let us look for a
moment closer at the threefolding of the social
organism of the world social order.
Many in anthroposophical circles will tend to believe threefolding is something we have to create and is not the present condition of the social world. This is partially true, but at the same time we need to recognize that the dynamics of social life have been active in the history of civilizations for thousands of years, and the slow evolution of the social organism has been set on a progressive course for a long time. For example, in the third cultural age the Cultural Sphere (the ancient Mysteries) ruled the social order. In the fourth cultural age, a Rights Sphere impulse was added at the foundations of Greek and Roman civilization in the idea of the State on the one hand and of the Citizen on the other. As the fifth cultural age emerged from the fourth, the rights life itself threefolded (State, Media, People - or citizen), just as the cultural life had already threefolded into Science, Art, and Religion. At the same time that the on-looker consciousness appears (as did the deepest aspects of the Ahrimanic Deception, namely materialism in all its aspects), so began the birth time of the economic life, which now struggles to differentiate into an inner threefolding of producers, distributors and consumers.
Clearly we live in a time when the concept of the
threefold social organism had barely begun to be
present and was at the same time never more
needed. Threefolding manifests itself
instinctively, but if we are to properly birth it
in a healthy social way, we have to know the Idea
of it consciously. as well as choose to embrace it
consciously. Here again is a teaching task which
anthroposophists may fail entirely to bring into
our shared social life.
With Ahriman’s
incarnation, powerful dividing forces entered into
the nature of the Stage Setting - the stream of
historical events and its structurally embryonic
threefold relationships. America (as a political
power ruled by an essentially unelected elite)
under this influence isolated itself on the world
Stage, taking the attitude that it could stand
alone (Ahriman’s attitude). Within America, groups
were set against groups, communities against
communities. Hate and mistrust was fostered, for
to some at least this was seen as an advantage.
This we know from the News, but other impulses
were simultaneously at work.
At the same time that
this isolating gesture pushed against the
instincts of the human spirit for community, the
instinctively developing consciousness soul
produced its counter-gesture. People did not
really want separation, and felt in their hearts
the social poverty of this tendency. As this
situation ripened, it brought with it a certain
developments in technology, which also contained
both potentials - one for isolation and one for
community building. This was woven into the the
whole world’s social fabric - a means of
connecting across previously disconnecting
boundaries. Someone in China could now meet and
work with someone in Sweden, instantly in the
moment.
Out of the earth,
human intelligence, guided in part by Ahriman’s
genius, raised up from the world of metallic
substances a network, perhaps a spider web of
inter-connectivity. A great power oozed out of its
previous sub-natural condition and took on form in
metal and plastic, spreading its arms all over the
world.
Yet, Ahriman was not
the only inspiring genius, and other impulses from
human beings took hold of this transformation of
substance and sub-nature and gave it higher
potential uses. It was after all capable of being
only a tool, and the real meaning of this tool was
in the hands and hearts of those who created how
to set it to work.
One kind of work was
the turning of human beings into number.
Everything that could be counted was being counted
and every fact that could be converted to data was
being converted. Human beings became capable of
being known as mere cyphers. As a result, when
Ahriman incarnated, he could take hold of this
number meaning of human beings and use that tool
to create a top down driven political power machine, filled with the callousness of cold
calculation exactly in the center of the social
organism: the Life of Rights.
A kind of social
heart attack was created in the instinctive
relationship of Americans for the Consciousness
Soul (English speakers are
instinctively in the Consciousness Soul in their
Life of Rights -
R.S. The Challenge of the
Times). Just when
the most egregious terrorist attack of modern
times shattered the world’s divisions and united
them in a shared sense of loss and tragedy
(remember the Towers were centers of international financial activity), the political
power elite of America turned away from this
warm-hearted world-wide joining, and used this
situation in the most callous and calculated
fashion. Centered in the most powerful Nation
State in the history of humanity, this heartless
thinking flowed outward as a political foreign
policy out over the world, encouraging division
and in the lie of all lies, everywhere
(domestically and internationally) suppressing
freedom in the name of freedom.
But, again as we have
already seen, Ahriman had not incarnated with only
his minions as companions. Michaelic warriors,
some very aware but most only instinctive, entered
into incarnation as well. At their insistence and
from their genius, the tool of metal, plastic and
sub-natural forces was put to other uses.
Reacting, the Consciousness Soul took on a
world-wide social form in thousands upon thousands
of new kinds of communities of association,
something it had been slowly preparing to do for a
long time. Civil Society was born, and the tool -
the Internet - was placed in the service of
heart-warmed thoughts. In so doing we need to
emphasize that this Sphere of heart-centered
activity (the Wise Earth) tended to arise on the
Internet as individual expressions of community
service. The I’s sought out other I’s and many
kinds of We’s were born.
The same tool Ahriman
used to create a social machine for the manipulation of political
power in America, was used by others to create a
living organism of communities world-wide in
scope, while at the same time concentrated in
America and active on all political fronts. Above,
in the top of a now decadent elite political
hierarchy, Ahriman worked, while below, spread out
across the social commons, the Consciousness Soul
- the Wise Earth - spoke back.
In the Wise Earth
impulse all manner of spiritual voices are heard.
The excesses of the Ahrimanically driven assault
via the Life of Rights on social order and
individual freedom has become so plain and
obvious, that communities of opposition are
everywhere being formed. As a prime incarnate opponent, Ahriman does his duty, driving
individuals toward the necessary moral dilemmas
and challenges. You could say that one of the
aspects of the Ahrimanic Incarnation is a kind of
heating up of social chaos - an inflaming of
disorder. This engenders in morally awake human
hearts the will to do battle. The dragon forces
circle social life everywhere, and the knights of
Michael, themselves no doubt students of the
spiritual world Michael School before incarnation,
take up their earthly social tasks. (see the book
Blessed Unrest, at: http://www.blessedunrest.com/)
Ahriman’s teaching is
harsh, and the I must stand up within itself and
in relationship with others, or succumb to soul
failures it would otherwise be unwilling to
tolerate in what we call: good
conscience.
Inwardly, in the deepest aspects of the soul,
invisible to outer sense experience, the presence
of Christ in the Ethereal (the realm of human
thought) is met with a hunger to know the Good on
the part of the I. This moral need for knowledge
of the Good (in order to know what is right to do
in the face of challenges forced upon humanity by
Ahriman’s intensification of the heat and pace of
social crisis) - this moral need instinctively
hungers for the Eternal, the experience of the
Consciousness Soul.
There, inside the soul, this hunger for knowledge
of the Good, coming in the time of the Second
Coming, leads to a Second Eucharist - a communion
of the I with the Being of the Good (for details
see the next essay: The
Meaning of Earth Existence in the Age of the
Consciousness Soul).
What an amazing
teacher and teaching is this Outrageous Genius, we
know as Ahriman, forcing us to awake to the Good
by driving into the Center Stage of social
existence, in the principle nation state in the
world, obviously powerful impulses of callous and
calculated indifference to human suffering and
need.
third, an entry more into the material, in the sense
of ordinary political and social
language
Brother What Ails Thee ?
In the following
discussion it is very important to keep in mind
that we are now mostly using a quite materialized
way of speaking and writing about something whose
true essence remains entirely spiritual in its most significant meaning.
Such a personality as
Ahriman incarnate, in my view, can be found just
here then in the American Life of Rights (working
from there upon the whole world), for after all
these preliminaries we must begin to name him. The
question for us, however, is: Will we recognize
this “human” being as a brother?
Karl Christian Rove
(birth name), was born December 25th 1950. Karl’s
biological father abandoned him early on, his
adoptive father left home when Karl was 18, and it
later became known that this second father was a
homosexual. His mother committed suicide when he
was 30. Karl described himself in high school this
way: “I was the complete
nerd. I had the briefcase. I had the pocket
protector. I wore Hush Puppies when they were not
cool. I was the thin, scrawny little guy. I was
definitely uncool”
[facts and quote from Wikipedia].
[There will be a few
quotes below about Rove-Ahriman (hundreds could
easily be provided). The reader should realize
that Rove has had such a strong influence (which
Outrageous Genius certainly would) that while
Google only shows 630,000 entries for him and
about 8 million for George W. Bush (and 1.5
million for Dick Cheney), all that is said about
Rove recognizes that his influence from behind the
scenes is the real dominant feature of the Bush II
Administration. He is the riddle and puzzle that
many have commented on seeking to penetrate his
real nature and activity in order to understand
the policies of the Bush II White House. His hand
prints are everywhere, and no historical political
figure has ever inspired such interest, both
positive and negative.
We could also keep in
mind this idea from Rudolf Steiner. In the
lectures published under the title The
Fall of the Spirits of Darkness, he presents the following for our
understanding. Just like what happened after the
mid-point of the various ages of Atlantis, we in
this the Post-Atlantean Epoch are past the
mid-point as well. Spiritual capacities and
impulses that are up-building and progressive in
the first half of an Epoch become in the second
half forces of degeneration. Decay sets in and the
course the Evolution of Consciousness takes must
be unfolded in the context of this decay. In
addition, with the Battle in Heaven between
Michael and the Dragon, which Michael had won by
1879, the Spirits of
Darkness were
pushed down into the realm of the Earth.
These spirits have to
be recognized as being everywhere, in particular
working with the dead and with the various occult
brotherhoods. So when we recognize in social
phenomena the prevalence of human evil, we have to
see that the tendency for this immorality to
dominate social existence cannot be avoided. In
fact, our ability to properly work with the times,
requires we not be asleep and have fantastic
visions of unrestrained potentials for utopias.
Our thinking has to root itself in reality, and
social reality cannot in our Age be forced into an
illusion of some kind of universal domain of
freedom and happiness. These facts then all the
more call to us, who receive Spiritual Science, to
develop our own soul life so that we will be able
to find the down to earth healing social ideas
that can actually be brought into incarnation.]
Now we must tell a
more detailed story of certain changes in social
life that have come at the same time as this
incarnation entered deeper and deeper into a core
aspect of the Life of Rights in America. Let us
begin by considering certain changes in law and
other governmental emphasis that have accompanied
the 7 plus years so far of the Bush II
administration (at the time of writing these
paragraphs). While doing this we need to keep in
mind how crucial is this moment in the Evolution
of Consciousness. A great deal is being decided by
individual human beings just now, and we cannot
blind ourselves by assuming that the struggles for
the future of America, and as a consequence the
whole World, are simply passing and insignificant
moments in history. These events are profound in
the deepest sense of that concept.
Not only that, we,
living today, are in the middle of them. It is no
accident we too have incarnated in the Time that
Ahriman is to be discovered as our most
significant outer-world teacher. What Ahriman
could not do, while excarnate through the Shadow -
the three-fold double-complex, he could now do as
a human being having incarnated just in this time
into the heart-center of human social life: the
Life of Rights, and giving birth there not to
heart-warmed thoughts, but rather the most cold
and calculated conceptions possible.
Over the course of
activity of this Administration, several
structural changes have occurred, which changes by
the way are not just confined to the time of the
Administration, but were authored further in the
past, and then matured and polished off in the
time since the 2000 election, the election,
remember, at the cusp of the New Millennium. Let
us list a few of those.
The Executive Branch,
mostly through the exercise of raw power has been
able to achieve a certain freedom from restraint
by the other two Branches (the Legislative Branch
and the Judicial Branch). This breaking down of
the threefold balance of the U.S. Constitution
gives to the will force, of those addicted to
power, extraordinary latitude in its conduct (this
is how we must see Cheney and Bush, as addicts to
the most addictive temptation of all - earthly
power). This executive power has become so freed
of any restraint that it neither must feel (the
significance of the Legislative Branch - the
People’s House) nor be wise (the import of the
Supreme Court). The American Government, during
Rove’s strongest period of influence, had no wise
head, nor any open heart. Nor would it do to see
this as a reflection of just the Republican Party.
The Ahrimanic confusion and the influence of the
Spirits of Darkness is everywhere, and we have now
mostly raw will forces owning the Executive Branch
of the dominant Nation State on the Earth, which
from there radiates out into the whole world
social organism heartless cold and calculating
thought and will.
The Bush II
administration’s definition of the meaning of the
War on Terror has taken hold of the political
consciousness of both major American political
parties. No major candidate currently running for
President wants to appear weak in the War on
Terror (a complete illusion by the way, once
critically examined as is being done out of the
social commons by the Wise Earth appearance of
Civil Society).
Thus also has torture
become officially permitted in the conduct of
self-interest by the U.S. government (using the
identical language of the Third Reich in its
justifications for torture). Included in this are
the powers to remove any claim of citizenship of a
natural or naturalized Citizen. Anyone anywhere in
the world (including Americans in America) can be
kidnapped and taken anywhere anytime to places of
prison and torture (extraordinary rendition). To
call these Imperial Powers, akin to that of Rome
at its most decadent, is to severely understate
the case, for the United States has far greater
powers than ever Rome could dream of.
There is a quote,
falsely attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville: America
is great because she is good, and if America ever
ceases to be good, she will cease to be great. While it turns out the great French
thinker never wrote this, the fact that it is
constantly quoted in public life suggests that it
nevertheless has deep meaning for Americans.
Civil liberties, once
taken for granted in the United States have been
neatly and nearly castrated. Since there is
nothing to require the government to admit to even
possessing the body of a single human being
(habeas corpus exists as a rule, but is
consciously ignored and obstructed by the Bush II
administration at every turn), we have no idea how
many have disappeared into the hidden bowels of
this out of control will. This is all the more
problematic if we recognize that to a certain
extent America is very much a cradle for future
spiritual development, so that the unopposed
emasculation of major components of the Life of
Rights in America is a significant victory for
Ahriman.
The power radiating
out from the imbalance in the State (the out of
control Executive Branch), has been joined by an
ahrimanic corporate control of the Media (the
heart of the heart of the social organism). Thus
it has come about that the threefold social
organism’s inner core (the Life of Rights), itself
is out of balance such that (or so it appears)
that the polar opposite to the State - the People
- is completely dominated through so much fear and
hopelessness, that many of the People have come to
believe themselves to be completely powerless.
“He
[Rove]
could carve up constituencies with the best of them,
and divide the country as easily as columns on a
spreadsheet -- and with no more thought” diarist “Hunter” DailyKos Aug.2007.
Yet, here is where
the counter-pole begins to appear, for recall that
Rudolf Steiner spoke in a lecture collected in The
Challenge
of the Times: English speakers are
instinctively in the Consciousness Soul in their
Life of Rights.
Ahriman’s incarnation arouses the Consciousness
Soul to action. Rove, by pushing forward the
callous and indifferent to consequences
unconscious will forces of Cheney and Bush II (and
others), stimulates in those who strive to follow
their political conscience the opposite reaction.
This administration has made of the lie an art never dreamed of even in the time of National Socialism (see Steiner’s The Karma of Untruthfulness). They have lied so successfully that large portions of the People of America have bought elements of it for years, and still buy into it (polls still show that large numbers believe Iraq was connected to 9/11). Granted the culture of the lie is everywhere, from daily advertising to individual human biographies, nevertheless the callous, calculated and repeated nature of these lies offered by a United States government is staggering. The only matter more staggering is how much they have managed to simultaneously hide from view.
The art of secrecy is
equally adept in this government. No one knows
what it is doing, and so clever has been the
manner of this hiding, that it is carefully
layered such that even if you think you have
caught them out, they have a backup plan - lies
within lies, as it were. As time has gone on, and
various members of the administration became more
publicly vulnerable, they have easily blocked
every effort to have them removed from office
(Rumsfeld and then Gonzales, for example), until
it was time to cut them loose and then install an
even better buffer in between public interest and
the truth. For example, nearly every military
general officer who would not spin and lie about
Iraq has been systematically removed until all
that is mostly left in positions of power are
career military general officers who are
themselves essentially politicians and sycophants.
The pure outrageous
nature of the nerve of this administration is
extraordinary. They lie, and then they act, and
then even when caught out, continue to lie and
lie. Holding powers stolen from the other Branches
(and to which these Branches acquiesce) there is
no motive to come clean in any fashion, for almost
no human heart forces are really present in this
home in which Ahriman created for himself and his
priests to incarnate.
“That’s
not the way the world really works anymore,'’ he continued. ‘’We’re
an empire now, and when we act, we create our own
reality. And while you’re studying that reality --
judiciously, as you will -- we’ll act again,
creating other new realities, which you can study
too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re
history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be
left to just study what we do” Senior white house official,
assumed by everyone to have been Karl Rove, summer
2002. [An earthly social-political act comparable
to materialism - a kind of political-social
Ahrimanic Deception.]
“The
great majority of mankind are satisfied with
appearances, as if they were realities” Machiavelli
At the locus of this
center of power of Earthly streaming forces, he
has come to rest, with his aides, in order to
imprint with his nature, the most earthly aspect
of the potential and unfolding threefold social
organism: the Life of Rights.
One of Ahriman’s
qualities is hardening. He desires that things
become fixed, immobile.
This means that one
Party in the United States strives to achieve
continuous dominance. Not only was a world
dominating power to radiate from the United States
as a center, but it was to have within itself a
loss of what had been an otherwise self-correcting
fluidity - that more than one Party would hold
power, which would mean that no longer could any
Ahrimanic excess of the Right be balanced out
through the pendulum swing by any Luciferic excess
of the Left . So it was desired that this swing of
the balance be stopped for a while, especially at
a particular Moment in Time; AND, if this
unbalancing gesture was to take into itself an
also rigid and arid religious impulse, then the
knowledge of the social effects of Christ’s True
Second Coming could be hidden, if not completely
blocked for centuries, in that the otherwise good
effects on the social world of humanity, this
Second Golgotha offered, were obscured and
interfered with.
Consider: Already,
the Anthroposophical Movement and Society had been
eviscerated from within, and led in its centers
into great confusion (any honest rendering of our
history in the 20th Century shows this - for
details see the essays below), so that basically
unopposed and unknown Ahriman could now undertake
the task to boldly assert temporal powers as an
obstacle to spiritual inspiration [for example,
the New Freedom Act which enables the government
to test all for mental illness and require
medicine to be given to those who fail this
examination]. In addition, granting political
power to an arid and rigid religious cult, calling
itself Christian, could do much to convince the
world that Christ and Christianity had nothing to
offer. So drawing this already decadent religious
impulse deeper into politics does a great deal
which is far more than just to secure votes at a
crucial moment, for whatever the outer world press
sees of the effects of this genius that radiates
out of the White House, you can bet this outer
world press is completely clueless to what is
truly at stake.
The ahrimanic
Christianity of the Religious Right hates all that
it judges (all beam and no mote), and speaks into
world culture in such a way that more and more the
world is pushed to hate such Christianity back.
What better way to turn minds away from the true
Second Coming, than to raise up a such a false and
foolish alternative, that seemingly* rational
people cannot but think of the idea of Christ and
the Second Coming as some kind of insanity. How do
we bring into such a world, a true appreciation of
Christ’s Second Coming, and the related Second
Eucharist, when ahrimanic Christianity has gained
such temporal power in the Bush II administration
to the dismay of so many intelligent people.
Ahriman is clever beyond our imaginations.
*[See Sam Harris’s The
End of Faith;
Christopher Hitchens’ God is
not Great: how religion poisons
everything; and,
Richard Dawkins’ The God
Delusion, where
what are called the New Atheists have taken
(hopefully briefly) center stage in the public
dialog on religion and Christianity.]
Craig Unger*, In an
interview with Amy Goodman, mid-November 2007: Well,
LeHay** is one of the founders of the Council for
National Policy. Now, this is a not-very-well-known
group, but it’s an umbrella group that oversees
dozens of Christian Right groups, like Focus on the
Family, which is James Dobson’s group. The Moral
Majority was part of it, and so on. And
within it was a much smaller group called the
Arlington Group, of about fifty religious leaders.
Now, they were in regular contact with Karl Rove.
And what you have in the Christian Right is as many
as 80 million adult evangelicals. You have about
200,000 pastors, and they operate almost as precinct
captains did in the labor unions for the Democratic
Party. So this is a vast populist movement that
operates as part of the Christian Republican Party,
and they have regular contact with the White House.
[emphasis added]
[*author of: The
Fall of the House of Bush: The Untold
Story of How a Band of True Believers Seized the
Executive Branch, Started the Iraq War, and Still
Imperils America’s Future. **one of the authors of the Left
Behind series of
novels on Armageddon.]
Christianity is not
alone in being so publicly compromised by the
materialization of religion.
“The
grim truth is that when George W. Bush declared “a
global war on terror”, he was really announcing a
jihad of his own - a struggle to convert the whole
world to American-style capitalist democracy....Here
lies the peril for the future. For how can “the Axis
of Evil” and “the Great Satan” negotiate a
businesslike compromise on the basis of
live-and-let-live?”
from the article: Bush the Jihadist: How the world
was plunged into an apocalyptic war, by Correlli
Barnett, Daily Mail, Sept. 2007.
“...these
ahrimanic powers are present wherever disharmony
comes about between groups of people...” R.S. lecture, 2 November 1919
Another matter to
recognize is that after 9/11, the ahrimanic forces
radiating out of the temporal power center that is
Washington, were able to bring about a Crucifixion
of the Imagination of America as a Beacon of Hope
for the poor and disenfranchised the world over.
Previously America (which is at root itself a
Mystery) stood in the imaginations of the world’s
downtrodden as the place of dreams, where one
could go and find freedom (spiritual-religious, as
well as political and economic). So Rove-Ahriman
not only created and encouraged a debased
Christian Meaning in the World, but also cast down
the single most important aspect of the American
Mystery in the present - its meaning as a Beacon
of Hope.
Let us now take a
necessary but small side trip here, and fit in two
of Ahriman-Rove’s chief allies: George W. Bush and
Dick Cheney. Both are addicted to power, but in
two entirely different ways. At the same time, let
us keep in mind the title to this section: Brother
what ails thee?. These are flawed (as we are all
flawed) human beings, placed by the Lord (Artist)
of Karma, in their biographies into very special
places in relationship to all of us. Like
Ahriman-Rove, they participate in the creation of
the heating and speeding up of social chaos -
conditions necessary for the development of the
Consciousness Soul through the I’s necessary
encounters with real existential moral crises.
Bush appears to be
what is called a dry drunk. That is, while he is
not actively drinking or drugging (we assume) he
still displays all the behaviors of a serious
alcoholic or addict: bouts of extreme anger (kept
mostly secret from the public, but well known to
West Wings staffers), coupled with a psychological
need to never admit he is wrong - the problem
always lies with someone else. In taking up the
outward (fake) posture of recovery, he adopted the
attitude of someone who has been saved by Christ.
No doubt encouraged by Rove (all the way back in
Texas), Bush courted the Religious Right, and here
found fuel for his own (hopefully sub-conscious)
megalomania - a religious conviction which
included him as being an active and dominant world
player in the End Times fantasy. So rigid is his
faith, as he constantly demonstrates by his
unchanging behaviors, that only this mega-illusion
has meaning - the truth has been banished from his
consciousness.
“Mr.
Greenspan described his own emotional journey in
dealing with Mr. Bush, from an initial elation about
the return of his old friends from the Ford White
House - including Mr. Cheney and Donald H. Rumsfeld,
secretary of defense - to
astonishment and then disappointment at how much
they had changed.” New York Times book review
describing Alan Greenspan’s (former chairman of
the Federal Reserve) book: The
Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World “...much to my disappointment,
economic policy making in the Bush administration
remained firmly in the hands of the White House
staff.” He was clearly
referring to the political team led by Karl Rove at
the White House. Mr. Rove was a neighbor of Mr.
Greenspan in a leafy enclave near the Potomac River,
but the two men almost never had a conversation.” [emphasis added]
“Rove’s
method is to plot out elaborate strategies well in
advance of the campaign, and stick to them
vigilantly. John Deardourff, Rove’s media consultant
for races in Texas and Alabama, says, ‘This rap Bush
has of never changing his mind and never admitting a
mistake-that’s Karl! That’s where it comes from.’ It
is a tribute to Rove’s strategic skill that he is so
often right.”
Joshua Green Atlantic Monthly 2007.
Already long before
his incarnation, Ahriman-Rove had cultivated the
illusory religious impulse that has at least
captured the sub-conscious of Bush, probably
through the help of Lucifer’s legions, for in its
rigid End Times world picture and rigid and fixed
morality, it has hardened all that was once Life
in these aspects of Christianity, and turned that
Life into a fixed and vain system of beliefs in
the soul.
The fixed nature
comes from Ahriman, and the vanity (pride of
belief in ones moral righteousness) comes from
Lucifer. Both these, however, arise indirectly in
the soul through the three-fold double-complex
(see the essay on the Shadow below).
Then comes Cheney.
Already a hard line cold-warrior, well connected
and supported by the elites of industry and
banking throughout his political career (Cheney
won his spurs here, while Bush was born into these
circles), Cheney (again no doubt encouraged by
Rove) became Vice President, and having an
intellect of far more depth than Bush’s,
discovered that the child of privilege had little
interest in actually understanding and wielding
the reins of governmental power (Bush loves to
playact as president). These then fell by default
to Cheney, and gave to his addiction more temporal
power than any human being has had in history, and
of such a nature that as a behind the throne power
he could do much that was unseen and thus
experience as all the more delightful its private
pleasures (the addictive payoff). Think on it! No
one could really oppose his actions always taken
in secret. He could tell any lie he wanted and
change them at will for everyone else was asleep.
Every urge and impulse to dominate his political
enemies and reward his rich friends could be
immediately indulged. Nothing stood in the way of
this will to excess, while at his side, and in his
aid was the most clever of minds ever, able with
just a word or two to encourage Cheney’s every
desire, and at the same time to likewise with
silver tongue encourage the child of privilege to
believe he was god’s chosen to stand in the world
just in this time. [Recall Tolkien’s character Wormtongue in the Lord of
the Rings!]
So then we have
around Rove, two personalities, the one lost in a
luciferic dream of egoistical historical place,
and the other, given the opportunity to wield
enormous earthly temporal powers, becomes instead
the creature of those very powers - possessed by
them. Recall from above Greenspan’s dismay to
discover the changes in his old friends. Rove’s truest
and more profound contributions, however, are of a
whole other kind, even though he played a
significant role in the transformation of a child
of privilege, from out of the culture of Texas oil
and wealth, into a public persona that doesn’t
actually bear any relationship to the underlying
human personality*. See: “Bush’s
Brain: How Karl Rove made George W. Bush
Presidential” by
Wayne H. Slater and James C. Moore.
*[To appreciate this even more, just consider how frequently it is now observed that Bush seems so often inappropriately happy as his term of office nears its end (or culmination?). A President, who honestly bore the necessary wounds of leading American into such a state as it is today, should be gray headed, careworn and full of melancholy.]
At the same time, we
have to remember the title to this section: Brother
what ails thee? It
is essential (as will be discussed in later
essays) to recognize in such personalities that we
are observing wounds of soul. Certainly there can be venality,
and even conscious choosing of evil, but if we
were to be able to live through the details of the
biography of such men as these, and see how their
inner life developed over this long period of a
lifetime, we would discover how the soul has been
wounded by life experience.
We all bear such
wounds. It would go too far here to go into
details, but the question Brother
what ails thee? is
directed exactly at discovering the mystery of the
wounds that lie behind choices and actions, so as
to be able to perhaps help heal our brothers and
sisters in life. With this thought in the background,
let us continue our examination of what has flowed
out of the center of the American government, and
into our shared public life.
In order for a single
Party to dominate, certain possibilities inherent
in our Time in relationship to technology have
become applied to the political process. Computers
are turned into ballot boxes. The striving for
power, which had taken possession of the
Republican Party, found a crucial inspiration in
all that Ahriman had prepared before his
incarnation, and in all that he was about to
accomplish during his incarnation. Win at any cost
is the goal, and the corruption of the ballot box
by electronic means provides an easy tool in a war
in which number is to play such an essential role.
Data is accumulated,
not just State by State, or city by city or
neighborhood by neighborhood (voting precinct by
voting precinct), and when possible individual by
individual. Profiles are created showing, through
the accumulation and use of well tracked
commercial purchases, just what attitudes each
individual who is potentially a voter is likely to
possess. The out-of-strict oversight computer
powers, of the United States intelligence
community (and willing corporate allies), is
through secret process turned on its own citizens,
and further data accumulated, such that there now
is in place and in the hands of a single party,
exactly which voters to encourage, and which to
discourage in order to place in power and keep in
power a single political party as the dominant
political force in America, itself (at a crucial
time) the dominant Nation State in the World.
Nor is this done with
any sense of the individual itself, as an I. It is
only their general characteristics as a set of
numbers on a spreadsheet that matter. One young
woman, who had worked with Rove, the human
incarnation of Ahriman, described in a televised
interview how remarkable it was to watch him pick
up a newly generated spread sheet from a computer,
glance at it and then immediately begin to issue
instructions, down the well oiled machinery
intended to coerce an election effect, from the
inside of the White House out into a neighborhood
and then surrounding an individual home.
In addition was
perfected what became called: the Republican talking
points. Spreading
out from the political center of the West Wing of
the White House, a well controlled and perfected
set of lies and spin was distributed throughout
Party officials (elected and otherwise) and among
the cooperative media, such as Fox News and the
widely listened to conservative radio talk shows.
If one listened across this spectrum, as well as
to the President himself and his chief spokesman
the White House Press Secretary, the same reality
was presented. Remember that Rove’s idea of the
power of deception is remarkable. Set the agenda,
set the tone of what is to be claimed to be true.
Create our own reality (an earthly political
ahrimanic deception), and never ever give an inch.
Radiating from the imbalanced and unhealthy will force of the Executive Branch had been created a huge manipulative mechanism for coercing the vote, precinct by precinct, drawing certain voters in, keeping certain voters out, and all the while ignoring places, neighborhoods and communities that could be seen by this cold calculating genius as having no meaning or worth at all. Coupled with this was an enormous publicity machine, never seen before, creating in that Nation State that believed itself most virtuous to have unlimited free speech, a propaganda mechanism quite beyond that known even in the time of National Socialism or Communist Russia.
This lie machine is
all the more devious (and clever) for it was
accomplished in what thought of itself as a
non-totalitarian state. In the center of the Life
of Rights, this calculated number driven process
came into existence, in which data streams about
voters were turned into numbers on a spreadsheet.
and false ideas about social reality merely items
on a sheet of talking points. What genius created
such a work!
“President
Bush’s powerful adviser is one part
spreadsheet-carrying, vote-counting political wonk,
and one part no-holds-barred, brass-knuckled
political operative”
Dan Froomkin.
“I’m
looking at 68 polls a week. You may be looking at
four or five public polls a week that talk about
attitudes nationally, but that do not impact the
outcome -” Karl
Rove in a radio interview late October 2006. “You
may end up with a different math, but you’re
entitled to your math. I’m entitled to the
math.” same
interview. [emphasis added]
In all this, the
Legislative Branch was compliant. Even so far as
to pass legislation requiring all States to issue
common-in-nature drivers licenses, that individual
States could then require be presented in order to
vote. This process of making voting more and more
difficult was another part of the grand scheme,
which then makes it possible to eliminate those
most inclined to vote for the Party that is not to
dominate - namely the Party whose fundamental
traditions connected it to the poor and
disenfranchised. Remember, Ahriman incarnated with
a community of like-minded, already disposed
through all his preparations to their own weakness
and self-interested heartless cold calculating
judgments. All he had to do was enter into the
center of these streams of downward radiating
powers, take hold of the number relations, and
polish off the machinery that was to permit a
solidified rule from the top down, during one of
the most significant moments of emergence of the
Consciousness Soul (the Dawn of the Third
Millennium), with its natural impulse to bring in
social reform out of the social commons - out of
the social below.
Now in this work, he
was not unopposed. As a human being, his will was
bound by many earthly laws. He could not force
those around him serve his will. He could only,
with extreme cleverness, encourage their
weaknesses and inclinations, thus the personality
changes that can be observed in those he
influenced while in (and on his way to) this
center of temporal power (from which he himself
recently resigned, which is, of course, just an
appearance - another kind of clever lie, his
influence is undiminished).
At that same time as
all this ahrimanic success, we need to come to
understand that his very genius in its one-sided
nature was also a blindness. This blindness came
to the fore in the 2006 general election in
America. Rove fully expected to win, his
spreadsheets told him so. However, human beings
are in fact not numbers, and not really
predictable at that level. Rove’s numbers told him
only of general characteristics, which were all
based on specific assumptions. When many of these
people walked into the polling booth, something
happened (and will continue to happen) which can’t
be reduced to number. People, when they vote, are
faced with what to them is essentially a moral
choice (English speakers are
instinctively in the Consciousness Soul in their
Life of Rights).
This righteous
impulse, invisible
to number driven perception, expressed itself strongly in the
2006 election, reacting in large part to all that
was being experienced as the callous indifference
radiating from the White House, and as political
impotence, corruption and incompetence in the
Legislative Branch. The Democrats won the House
with far more seats than expected by any pollster
(whose immature science suffers the same
perceptual limits as Ahriman), and further won the
Senate as well, something not expected by either
Party. Since this victory gave the chairmanship of
the various House and Senate committees to the
Democrats, a very large shift in power occurred in
the Life of Rights in the United States of America
(in the People’s House especially, with it role as
regards “feeling”). While such a shift of power is
not able to manifest in a rapid fashion (in spite
of the hopes of the Left), this expectable
time-delay has enabled the White House to continue
to act out its disdain for the People, treating
them as number-cyphers instead of as real human
beings.
“Rovism
is not simply a function of Rove the political
conniver sitting in the counsels of power and making
decisions, though he does. No recent presidency has
put policy in the service of politics as has Bush’s.
Because tactics can change institutions, Rovism is
much more. It is a philosophy and practice of
governing that pervades the administration and even
extends to the Republican-controlled Congress. As
Robert Berdahl, chancellor of UC Berkeley, has said
of Bush’s foreign policy, a subset of Rovism, it
constitutes a fundamental change in ‘the fabric of
constitutional government as we have known it in
this country.'"Neal
Gabler The Los Angeles Times Sunday 24 October
2004.
“The
whole art of war consists in a well-reasoned and
extremely circumspect defensive, followed by rapid
and audacious attack.”
Rove campaign memo from the early years in Texas.
“Rove
is the greatest political mind of his generation and
probably of any generation. He not only is a
breathtakingly smart strategist but also a clever
tactician. He knows history, understands the moods
of the public, and is a visionary on matters of
public policy. But he is not a magician.” Fred Barnes, conservative
commentator, editor The Weekly Standard.
“Dubbed
the “architect” and “Bush’s brain”, Rove plotted the
rise of George W Bush and departed the White House
after the disastrous 2006 mid-term elections.
Successful punditry is a combination of real
political experience, intellectual nimbleness, a
provocative turn of phrase and a coherent point of
view. Rove, a Fox News commentator and contributor
to Newsweek and the Wall Street Journal, has all
these qualities.
“Democrats
may protest that they would rather see him in jail
than on their television screens but they can’t help
noting what he says. Whether outlining what the
Democrats should do or outlining John McCain’s rocky
path to victory (and McCain has followed his advice
almost to the letter), Rove’s take is important and
often surprising. Expect the name Rove to come up
frequently on the campaign trail - and in coverage
of it.” Comments in
the British newspaper The Telegraph, who ranked
Rove (since leaving the White House) as
the number one (of the top 50) pundits in U.S. Politics, Friday, May 2nd,
2008.
Ahriman-Rove’s genius
is seen by many, and his incarnate influence is
far from over. He has left the realm of the State
now, and is taking up his mature biographical
position in the real heart of the Life of Rights:
Media. From here he can continue his influence,
for his very success is attractive. Because of the
influence of the ahrimanic shadow on people, many
will succumb, for that same callous and calculated
indifference toward which they are inwardly
tempted, will now reside in those aspects of Media
open to making such views widely known and
justified.
It is not an accident
that Rove now works for two major Rupert Murdoch
Media companies, Fox News and the Wall Street
Journal. Many will read him, and his clever genius
will guide and teach, all who will listen, into a
life without any moral center at all - only the
cold calculus of intellect, and its anti-human
world views and impulses of will.
Ahriman-Rove has now risen to the celebrity heights of the social world as a Media personality, respected and trusted by many, for he reflects back to them all the justifications they need for their own ahrimanic tendencies. A quite neat fit, if you think about it. The Shadow of Ahriman within, and the Stage setting influenced by Ahriman without.
Even so, the individual I in the Age of the
Consciousness Soul would chart its own course. His
very presence arouses something in the I that
needs just that presence as a goad to its own
awaking.
finally, a look at the challenges to the
role of the Society and Movement as a consequence of
recognizing Ahriman’s present day incarnation
Waking the American Anthroposophical Society and Movement
for their true tasks in the 21st Century
The above then is
what happened on the macro scale of modern human
history. What then on a micro scale has happen in
the internal makeup of the Anthroposophical
Society and Movement? Were we somehow free of this
influence? Did Ahriman incarnate and just ignore
us in the process? I think not, and in the next
essays it will be unfolded just what needs to
happen within our circles in order for us to be
able to speak first honestly among ourselves,
before we can earn the moral authority to truly
bring Anthroposophy further into world
incarnation. The greatest potential for leading
the instinctive Consciousness Soul into full
awakening lies in Anthroposophy, and by
implication in the Society and Movement. But these
problems are not simple and many of the essays
below are required of anyone wanting to really
learn what is needed to be learned in order to
meet the Challenge of Ahriman’s Incarnation on the
Cusp of the New Millennium.
We have one last
task,however, which is most essential. Having
discovered Ahriman’s incarnation, how are we to
treat the living man, now and into the future?
Ahriman-Rove has a family - a wife and a son:
should they think of him as evil? Of course not,
he is a genius, he is a cosmic power incarnate,
who will at the final judgment weep at the feet of
the Mother and beg forgiveness for all that he
had, out of his given nature, the responsibility
to author.
Those seduced by
Ahriman-Rove are to be pitied. Our problem then is
not to assume evil and seek to rub it out, but to
see clearly the
social processes so that we, who would do the good,
can discover how our work can be applied in the
right places. Many already are working in such
ways, albeit instinctively, and others will want
to hate Rove, Cheney, Bush and their friends.
Should we follow such an example, or create
another? How do we redeem what Ahriman-Rove has
done and properly honor it?
We are also
frustrated by the scope of the debacle -
Ahriman-Rove has spread chaos in the world in a
huge way, and this is not yet finished, for much
worse may yet be done by those who have succumbed
to his influence. This Ahrimanic Impulse, living
throughout the social world of humanity, has
pushed that world toward its breaking and fracture
points in a quite precise fashion through the
influence of Ahriman-Rove within the excesses of
the Bush II administration. The whole social order
of Western Humanity is breaking down. Wherever we
look, whether at global warming, the crisis in the
food supply, the corporate theft of the water
supply, the spreading of technological means of
biological destruction, the machinations of those
in the banking and finance industries and the
interference with the genetic code itself, - all
stands on the brink of even further decay, while the
political life by its everywhere pursuit of
dominance, engages all structure in war, at
a time when in order to survive humanity needs
instead of war to develop the greatest skills at
cooperation.
One of the worst
effects, as previously noted, is the crucifixion
of American Dream. All over the world, that which
had once been a Beacon of Hope to many people
living amidst poverty and despair, has now been
tarnished, perhaps beyond repair. Is this not then
the next goal for America, to discover how to
restore what has been defiled? Who will lead here?
Who will understand this need for the imagination
of the downtrodden the world over to have once
more a Beacon of Hope? Can there be a resurrection
of what was crucified? What kind of moral forces
could bring this about?
We are also right to
be concerned whether the political machine that has been created will live on
into the future inside the core of the America
Government. Already, many wonder whether the
Democrats will roll back some of what has been
done, should they win the White House in 2008. A
lot of people believe many of the worst of the
changes introduced by Rove and friends will be
permanent.
All kinds of debris
live as the after-effects of Ahriman-Rove’s
incarnation. The situation and consequences will
not go away, but reverberate on into the future,
and we have to not just come awake, but must learn
how to stay awake.
Into the world the
power, the tone, the sound of number, and the
searing light of geometry incarnated, with its
naturally given mission to draw downward the heart
of the developing social organism into rigid form
and lifeless brilliance - what Rove called “the
math”. Here too was
“mission accomplished”, because while the Anthroposophical
Movement and Society lost themselves in a massive
forgetting of the true significance of Steiner’s
scientific introspection (The
Philosophy of Freedom, and A Theory
of Knowledge Implicit in Goethe’s World Conception), and in ignoring the beauty and
potential for community life given by Steiner in Awakening
to Community as the
Reverse Cultus, we also took the living Michaelic
Cosmic Intelligence given to us by Steiner through
Anthroposophy and converted it to dead
intellectualized content, without any life at all:
the Steinerism displayed constantly in the
excesses of Steiner-said.
There are no
redeeming powers in Steinerism, such that without
The Philosophy of Freedom
(Spiritual Activity)
and the Reverse Cultus, with which to meet the deeper
spiritual after-effects of Ahriman’s incarnation,
the Movement and Society are impotent. At the same
time, American Anthroposophy (which this book
seeks to illuminate) offers just those needed
antidotes and inspiration for all of Anthroposophy
world-wide. The American Soul must awake now, and
the best leaders for this will be those American
Anthroposophists who have the will and the courage
to find the truth of who they are, as a separate
but equal soul force in the threefold world.
For example, Ahriman
accomplished a great deal during the weaknesses of
the 20th Century into which the Society and
Movement fell, such that all kinds of wisdom was
lost and buried in Ahriman’s “preserving
jars”, locked up
either in books stashed in libraries, and in books
allowed to go out of print. Hundreds of
significant works, by early students of Steiner,
have been allowed to go out of print, while the
anthroposophical publishing houses reprinted again
and again Steiner’s lectures, erroneously leaving
aside all the work done by others during the 20th
Century.
Let me take up just one other theme left in the dust heap of the 20th Century, along side The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity and the Reverse Cultus: namely Projective Geometry. Nothing else has quite the ability to give to the Life of the Mind the forces necessary with which to meet Ahriman’s one-sided: “...power, the tone, the sound of number, and the searing light of geometry incarnated...”.
Let us begin with an
obscure out of print essay by George Adams
Kaufman: Space and the Light
of Creation: a new essay in cosmic theory. Just in the Chapter headings of
this essay we can feel/see the redemptive force of
the new thinking as it penetrates the very realm
of Ahriman and lifts it free through the art of
thought of the tendency to an excess of gravitas:
Chapter I: Radiation of
Space; Chapter II:
Music of Number; and, Chapter III: Burden
of Earth and Sacrifice of Warmth.
One of the tasks of
American Anthroposophy will be to rediscover and
ingest the art of others besides Steiner, which
has been given to us by European anthroposophical
endeavors during the 20th Century. This is
something far beyond what Steiner had provided,
but which he certainly inspired. In the essay far
below: a letter to a young
anthroposophist,
you will find details.
Olive Whicher’s book:
Projective Geometry: Creative
Polarities in Space and Time, should never be out of print, and
ought to be on the same shelf with every
anthroposophist’s copy of The
Philosophy
of Spiritual Activity and Awakening
to Community. By
the way, little or no abstract thought is called
for in this way of study - as all that is
essential is taught through drawing.
The significance of
Projective Geometry can be found here, quoted by
Olive Whicher in her introduction to Adam’s
remarkable Physical and
Ethereal Spaces: “Confirmed
by Rudolf Steiner in the knowledge that the quality
of thought prevailing in the new geometry is in
reality indispensable
both to the scientist in his quest of world-reality
and to the individual on
a path of spiritual development...” [emphasis added].
The living (heart)
thinking, to which many anthroposophists today
aspire (but believe comes far easier than it
actually does), needs to remain scientific and
picture-like in all its qualities. Nothing aids
this need better than the study through drawing of
Projective Geometry, which teaches the I how to
move and weave living pictorial thought, through
and from one metamorphosis to the next, all the
while never losing the exact and precise quality
of scientific thinking.
To truly meet and
contain Ahriman-Rove, we also need a living
spiritual social science, whose scientific
qualities can only be found through pictorial
thought trained in the disciplines of Projective
Geometry and Goetheanism (A
Theory of Knowledge Implicit in Goethe’s World
Conception). We
meet his powers, with those of our own. Then out
of this soul training, the I can hear the World
Song in which is contained the logos
speaking of the
Christ into the social world of humanity (as the
Lord - the Artist - of Karma). Just as Goethe
learned to listen to the speech of Nature, we must
now learn to listen to the speech of the social
world, and then out of our own forces of art and
story telling, render this logos
speaking into
pictures we share with each other.
Let me end by
bringing forward one last matter, which in its
details can be found below in the discussion of
the true soul roots of the Mystery of America.
This will be there developed much more fully -
here I only want to hint at its dimensions.
The roots of the
American Soul, by the way, are not found in
Europe, but in America’s Aboriginal Peoples. The
soul is determined by two main influences of which
the most earthly is the local geography, while the
most heavenly is the incarnating spirit. Spirit
and place interact, and the soul is born.
Among the various
Nations of Indians, there is one who has a very
special relationship to the whole: the Hopi. All
the Elders of the other Nations recognize this. It
is from a Hopi that we received the idea in the
1990‘s: we are the people we
have been waiting for.
The Hopi Prophecy
anticipates the arrival from the East (from the
rising Sun), of the True White Brother. This influence is to
come at a time when the Nations of Indians will be
in dire need, for world conditions will have
brought about their near destruction. Only one or
two individuals may still be alive that are true
to their deepest teachings. In the most crucial
words of the Prophecy we find this statement: “This
third event will depend upon the Red Symbol, which
will take command, setting the four forces of nature
(Meha) in motion for the benefit of the Sun.”
You can find details below, but let me just render my best interpretation of this phrase in the language with which anthroposophists are familiar (it will be well worth repeating in greater depth later).
At the time of great
crisis, the World will be three times rocked into
War. It is the last, the third event, which is the
most crucial. The outcome of this third event
(Ahriman’s Incarnation) will depend upon the
Red Symbol, or the
People of the Rose-Cross. These People of the
Rose-Cross, the True White Brother (true in the sense of
also being awake to the living Being of the Earth
Mother and the Father in the Sky, as once were all
Aboriginal Peoples), will then take
command, setting the four forces of nature in motion. These are the forces of the Four
Directions (honored in the Pipe Ceremony of the
Lakota Sioux), or the Cosmic Ethereal Forces (and
their elemental servant beings in Nature), which
even Steiner recognized when he laid the
Foundation Stone for the original Goetheanum in
the Earth, and then later the Foundation Stone
Meditation in the hearts of those who attended the
Christmas Conference.
All this for
the benefit of the Sun. To understand this all we need to
remember is that the Hopi Prophecy originated in a
People who remembered Atlantis (see below). At the
time of Atlantis, where was Christ? He was in the
Cosmic Sun Sphere! What then does all this come to
mean, especially given that the Prophecy also
recognizes that this needed work of the True White Brother can fail to manifest?
The outcome of the
Third Event - the third time the World is rocked
into War (Ahriman’s Incarnation) depends upon the
People of the Rose-Cross bringing forward a
scientifically based knowledge of the Ethereal
Cosmic Forces, not just in the living aspects of
the sense world, but in the life of thought
itself. Moreover, all this in service to the
Christ, by announcing His True Second Coming in
the Ethereal, with all its majesty (a Second
Crucifixion, a Second Resurrection, and a Second
Eucharist).
Are anthroposophists
up to such a task? Apparently that remains to be
seen.
appendix two
from the book the
Way of the Fool
[For the neophyte:
Ahriman's incarnation as Karl Rove in the
social-political world, really only effected the
Stage Setting, which serves as a background to our
individual biographies. Granted this Stage Setting
is far more realistic than the cardboard and paint
of a theater, nevertheless the relationship,
between our individual lives and the historical
backdrop in which those lives unfold, is captured
quite neatly by the Bard's metaphor of Stage
Setting and Actors in a Role. Ahriman is a
significant ruler of the characteristics of the
Stage Setting, but as regards the soul and
spiritual element of the human being (our inner
world and life), Ahriman, through his influence
via our Shadow (the double-complex), is but a
small though significant part, while we ourselves
can be the Star.
Ahriman is also not
the Author of the Play, Christ is - Christ as Lord
(Artist) of Karma, and we as free choice-makers.
Just as the East sometimes talks of there being
something that might be called (in the human
being) a Buddha Nature, so we in the West can
speak of a similar characteristic of being human -
the Christ Impulse. Out of the Buddha Nature of
the human being comes Compassion, and out of the Christ Impulse of
the human being comes Love. So the two combine: Christ Himself
as Lord (Artist) of Karma, who works with our
freedom, so that we can out of that freedom
ourselves author human love in the form of the
Christ Impulse.
In this realm (the
inwardness) Christ can have far more influence if
we know how to choose to make that possible. The
inwardness belongs to our will (we know this
instinctively), but for the individual I to become
the proper steward of all the potential capacities
hidden in this inwardness does require that we
wake up there and begin to be active. In this next
essay I lay out just how Christ has made himself
available to us directly when we strive to be
moral - that is when we seek to know and do the
Good (or as Rudolf Steiner would say: become
knowing doers).
As such the essential
lesson from the story of Ahriman's incarnation can
be seen in that his activities push many people in
the direction of such soul pain that they are
confronted by a choice as to whether to remain
asleep or actually wake up to the conditions of
inflamed social chaos and insane speed of life.
Modern existence, for all its seeming unnecessary
difficulties is actually a blessing. Just as
physical illness is a transformative blessing, so
are today's illnesses in the social existence of
humanity.
Of crucial importance
is to keep in mind what was mentioned above, in
that religious fundamentalism (Christianity forced
into arid and dead doctrines and dogmas, by the
influence of the ahrimanic double) acted in the
world in recent years in such a way that made a
mockery of the True Second Coming. Nothing Ahriman
has accomplished is a potent as this misdirection,
which has made people shy of the promise Christ
made to come again. This essentially fake
Christianity is simply a modern version of what a
similar impulse among the Hebrew people
accomplished at the time of the Incarnation - that
is: People in that time were lead away from the
truth by those who sought to maintain their own
power and stature as religious leaders, rather
than understand that Love begins with Service to
the Thou (washing the feet), and then leads
ultimately through trials to Love as a total
Sacrifice of self for other.
We live in a time in which a similar gesture permeates the Christian world. Religious leaders tend to prefer themselves over others, and being more in love with their own thoughts of what is the truth, they keep their flocks (and those who hunger for spiritual enlightenment) from knowledge of the True Second Coming. In the essay below (and those that immediately follow) I offer to the reader precise instructions as to how to experience the True Second Coming, first as a Sacrament in the Soul - a Second Eucharist in the Ethereal - in the world of thought, that arises when we authentically seek to know the Good, or what I also call: discovering the experience of Love Engendered Free Moral Grace as that arises out of the spiritual activity of the own I.]
The Meaning of Earth Existence
in the Age of the Consciousness Soul
*[John 16: 12-15 “I
have much more to say to you, but you can’t bear it
just yet. But when the other comes, the breath of
truth, he will guide you in the ways of all truth,
because he will not speak on his own, but will speak
what he hears and announce to you what’s coming. He
will glorify me, because he will take of what is
mine and announce it to you. Everything the Father
has is mine: that’s why I said he will take of what
is mine and announce it to you.”]
*
There yet remains a
small effort to make a synthesis this work - to
make a whole out of seemingly disparate parts. I
will try to be brief.
A principle aspect of
the great Mystery of our Time is the Mystery of
Evil, both outwardly in the structural backdrop to
the shared social world of humanity, and inwardly
in the depths of our own souls. I have tried above
to point out how it is that the essential matter
is not the outer social world, but the inner soul
world, and the trials and education of the i-AM, in the biography. The context,
which we need to call the maya of history and current events, and
which is receptively
held
everywhere from below by the Dark Mystery of the
Divine Mother, all passes away, and only what is
Eternal, that is what becomes an aspect of the
developing i-AM, continues; and, this inner realm
(the whole Inwardness of the Creation, which
includes human souls and spirits) only exists because of the Heavenly Mystery of
the penetrating
thoughts
of the Father, while the whole (the outer social
maya and the eternal inner mind) is
created, loved, overseen and mediated (wherever two
are more are gathered...), in all its Grace filled and
Artistic interrelationships, by the Earthly [new
Sun] Mystery of the sacrifices of the Son.
We (humanity) now
begin to move out of our spiritual childhood, and
in making our way through the Rite of Passage that
is Life as it leads us toward our spiritual
maturity we need to take hold of the complex of
the doubles and the karma of wounds, as these
thrive within our souls, and which encourage human
evil through temptation and inner prosecution.
Even so, this task of meeting the Mystery of Evil
within the soul is not as heavy as we think, for
through the Shepherd’s Tale [Charles Sheldon], the
King’s Tale [Rudolf
Steiner], the Healers’ Tale [the community-created Twelve-Steps]
and the Sermon on the Mount, we have all the practical
instructions that we need.
In seeking to
understand in ourselves these three: moral
grace, freedom and love [each of these is elaborated in great
detail in the book], we set before ourselves what
is required to be learned in this Age and it is
with these three naturally unfolding capacities
that we are Graced and strengthened so as to be
able to meet with courage the Mystery of Evil. If
we do dare this path, and seek for the deepest
instruction in Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, then
will come to us a change in the nature of our
biography, such that it more and more takes on the
pattern, described in the John Gospel, as the
Seven Stages of the Passion of Christ (the
washing of the feet; the scourging; the crowning
with thorns; the carrying of the cross; the
crucifixion; the entombment and the resurrection) (for a careful exposition of these
Seven Stages, see Valentin Tomberg’s
[anthroposophical] book: Inner
Development).
Whereas Christ lived
this in an apparently mostly physical way, those,
who truly follow In His
Steps [the
name of Sheldon’s book, as well as a critical
phrase** in Ben-Aharon’s The
Spiritual Event of the Twentieth Century -
a profound Imagination of the True Second Coming], will in the main feel these trials
in their souls, as aspects of the joy and
suffering in the human biography.
**[“Now
when they identified themselves with the situation
of earthly humanity, the souls who remained true to
[Archangel]
Michael prefigured, in their planetary Earthly-Sun
life, the great Sacrifice of Christ. They walked
again in His steps [emphasis added]
as they did in former earthly lives, only now the
order of following was reversed. They went before
Him, showing Him the way, acting out of free and
self-conscious human decision, and He followed in
their steps [emphasis added] only
after they fully united themselves with the divided
karma of Earth and humanity. Only then could He
offer His sacrifice as the answer to the new, future
question of human existence: the question concerning
the mission and fate of evil.” Jessiah Ben-Aharon, The
Spiritual Event of the Twentieth Century.]
These trials may seem
difficult, but the truth is they are merely human.
It was Christ becoming human that went to the
Cross, for how could He place an example before us
we could not do out of our own humanity (just as
Sheldon wrote in In His
Steps). [something
written by a Shepherd (a pastor) in America, at
the same time Steiner (a King) was writing his The
Philosophy of Spiritual Activity (Freedom)] It is the human in Christ that asks
in the Garden of Gethsemane that the cup be taken
from him, but if not, He accepts the Father’s
will. While later it is the even deeper human in
Christ that says on the Cross: “My
God, my God, why did you abandon me?”. Who among us, in the trials and
sufferings of life, has not uttered these same
thoughts? [That Steiner teaches an esoteric
meaning for the end of life statements of Christ,
in no way contradicts their exoteric meanings,
which are also true.]
It is here that
Christ’s teachings strongly diverge from the
Wisdom of the Buddha, for the Buddha would have
had us overcome suffering by learning not to know
it (one version of the third Noble Truth of the
Buddha reads as follows: “ ...concerning
the Cessation of Suffering; verily,it is
passionless, cessation without remainder of this
very craving; the laying aside of, the giving up,
the being free from, the harboring no longer of,
this craving.”,
whereas Christ asks us to embrace our human pain
so that we can pass through the Narrow Gate of
suffering to then know our deepest self, the true
i-AM, and then through this burning trial
of knowledge of the true-self, ultimately come to
Him. If we would follow In
His Steps then we
too must take on ourselves the errors (sins)*** of
the world, and the tasks of forgiveness and love,
for every love engendered
free act of moral grace takes up a small part of Christ’s
suffering, so that we too participate in the
deepest creative acts of the Seventh Day of
Creation - the
transformation of evil into love. [This is for anthroposophists the
teaching attributed to Mani, but the reason such a
personality even knows this is because the
transformation of evil into love is modeled for us in the deepest
felt actions of the Divine Mother and the Son.
When we know intimately these actions of the
Divine Mystery, we know the true spiritual meaning
of the Mystery of Evil, and that this Mystery is
Itself the real source of the earthly doctrine
connected to it that is sometimes called
Manichaeism.]
***[The word sin does
not appear in the original Greek, from which the
Gospels were translated into the other languages.
The Greek word hamartia, misused to indicate sin, actually
means “missing the mark” (it is a term from archery). See in
this regard the Unvarnished
Gospels by Andy
Gaus.]
Is this foolish? Of
course, but we need not fear this Way
of the Fool, for
our Faith in Christ’s Promises will always be
fulfilled, as we ourselves can learn to become the
fulfillment of the law and the prophets. Yes, this
Way is full of trials, but whoever has lived life,
and reflected upon their experience, knows that in
the meeting of our biography’s trials with courage
we discover what it truly means to be human: to
struggle, to fall, to get up and to learn - and,
through this process, gently and humbly, begin to
take up along side and with Him, Christ’s kind and
light, Yoke of Love.
Having said all this,
it becomes necessary to make one last picture for
the reader, for clearly, in that we read the news
and hear of the horrors of man’s continuing
inhumanity to man, we ourselves face a terrible
trial. How are we to understand a world seemingly
so filled with Evil?
Picture, for a
moment, the surface of the Earth. Below dense
matter and fiery substance, while above, airless
space. Humanity lives out its Earth Existence only
in this narrow spherical band of Life, whose
diameter is just under 8,000 miles (and whose
height is just three to four miles, because above
15,000 feet above sea level, the atmosphere starts
to not contain enough oxygen to support our
breathing). The total surface area of the Earth is
196 million square miles, and the habitable land
area 43 million square miles Six billion plus
human beings must find all that they physically
need, which when we consider actual available
arable land (land that could be cultivated for
food, and other necessary resources), means that
each individual only has a square 161 feet on a
side from which to grow what they need. This then
is the
physical spacial aspect
of the social organism of the whole world.
Yet, we know that
this spherical space is itself often unwisely
distributed, for human social arrangements,
whether rooted in dominance and selfishness (dominion
over) or generosity
and sharing (communion with), these social arrangements seem to
determine this social order. This stream of moral
gestures (choices), of good and/or of evil, moves
out of and through human beings, organizing the
physical one.
As to this moral
aspect
of the social organism of the whole world, it has reached in this Time a kind of
climax of development, and it will be important to
appreciate the true nature of the logos
order in which
Christ has set modern human existence, through His
creative powers as the Artist (Lord) of Karma (the
precise and love based placement of individual
biographies in relationship to each other). Here
is something Natural Science cannot do, for the meaning
of existence is
beyond the weaknesses of their yet fanciful and
spirit-empty images. This will also help us to
understand why so many (falsely, but with some
degree of reason) believe we live in the End
Times.
In the Twentieth
Century the world was woven together into a single
social organism, not just via the globalization of
economic matters, or the personal interconnections
offered by the Internet, but most centrally by the
Media. At the beginning of the 20th
Century, few knew what went on elsewhere the
world, in any detail or with any immediacy. At the
end of the 20th Century, at the same time that the
returned Kings’ were unfolding the New Revelations
of Christ [the story of the 20th Century involves
a return of the meaning-essence of the Three Kings
of the Gospels - that is a return of the knowledge
of Gnosis, hungering to be woven again into a
single whole with true Faith - an event which
clearly had to accompany the True Second Coming],
the world itself was woven into a whole in the
sense that no macro social event was not to be
almost immediately known everywhere the same day
(if not the same hour) that it happened.
We live in a time
when has arisen a Culture of Media - a kind of
knowledge commons, in which vast resources are
used to create for us pictures of the meaning of
the world and of events. The more developed the
country, the greater our daily experience can be
saturated with the messages coming from this
Culture of Media.
Moreover, great effort and expense is gone into by those who would force us to believe what they want us to believe. Between advertising, political propaganda, outright lies, weak or lame reporting, and other similar failures to reach the truth, this saturation of the soul by the Culture of Media would seem to fail to offer us any service at all. What is not appreciated is that the Christ is far wiser than even the deepest believers imagine. Every evil is eventually turned to good, and next we will explore the prime example for our time.
Recall what has been
pointed out many times now, that the
individual
biography is the central reality of life on the
Earth. What happens
inside us as we experience life is much more
important and enduring than the outer events which
surround us. That Stage Setting (all
the world’s a stage....) is but epiphenomena to the reality
of the life of the soul. To help us appreciate
this then, let us explore these matters from the
point of view of the individual biography.
In this time, there
are over six billion plus of these biographies
woven into the tapestry of the social organism of
the whole world. Six billion lives held delicately
and exactly within the Love and Divine Justice of
the Mystery. Within these biographies, all the
individual i-AMs experience that precise and personal
instruction that hopes to lead them to the
realization of their own divinity and immortality
of spirit. [The epoch (rite of passage) of the
Consciousness Soul is 2100 years long, going from
the time of the beginning of the on-looker
separation (and the creation of Natural Philosophy
- Science) in the 1400‘s, until the years around
3500 AD.]
To understand this we
need to think it from the inside out, and not from
the outside in. The Culture of Media only provides
context, never essence. True, life is hard, even
harsh, even terrible. The naive consciousness
wants to turn away from this suffering, and cannot
understand how God (the Divine Mystery) could
allow such things as torture, child abuse and the
genocidal acts which are dumbed down by the terms:
ethnic cleansing.
The reality is that
what the Divine Mystery does is to allow for
freedom. This most precious gift is essential to
the immortal spirit during its Rites of Passage we
are calling: Earth Existence. Moreover, the
Mystery also makes certain there is a true Justice
through the post-death passages of kamaloka and
lower and higher devachan, in a manner no human
social structure can provide. Christ has told us
this in the Sermon on the Mount: “to
what sentence you sentence others, you will be
sentenced”.
All this should be
kept in mind as we proceed.
As a single ego, I
wake in the morning. From the night I bring the
remainder of yesterday, perhaps worked over.
Surrounding me, as I live the day, are the lives
of those with whom I have a karma of wounds - with
whom I have a debt of meaning to creatively work
over. This we carry together, each bearing a part,
each bearing their own wounds. These are wounds
from the past, from the present and from the
future.
To observe the world
of today, as we walk the walk of our lives, is to
observe trials of fire and suffering - rites of
wounding and being wounded. But not just this, for
also there is healing. Where we let love thrive,
wounds become healed.
Thus flow all our
days, often too fast to even notice the beauty and
wonder of the sea of personal relationships and
shared trials. Yes, there is misfortune, and evil
deeds. But do we really imagine Christ and the
Divine Mother lets this evil happen without
recourse or justice? We may not know this directly
through Gnosis, but we also can have Faith. Gnosis without Faith is empty of Life; and, Faith without Gnosis is empty of the Truth. Only when we join them together, do
we get: the Way (the Mystery of living the Good), the
Truth (the Mystery
of knowing the Good) and
the Life (the
Mystery of union with the Good).
This then is the
wonder of the outer and inner biography, for often
the wounds are not visible. Yes, sometimes the
wounds are visible to our eye or ear for we see
people too fat, too thin, too lamed in body, too
poor, too physically or mentally deficient. Often,
however, so many of us suffer
in silence that we
really do not know the nature and personal meaning
of their wounds - only our own are visible to the
eye of our heart, unless we first learn to
exercise and unfold certain powers of soul and
spirit.
Amidst all this
visible and silent suffering, we find ourselves
woven into the Culture of Media. Images and sounds
flow around us, pictures of a world on the verge
of chaos and madness. Yes, we have the intimacy of
our personal biography, but through the Culture of
Media we are drawn into the painted backdrop of
the whole world - a backdrop we all share. War in
Iraq. Global warming. Governments out of control.
Pandemics waiting in the wings. Local economic
recession, and even world-wide depression.
What lives in this
painted backdrop - in this Stage Setting - in the
wise relationship of the Culture of Media to the
unfolding of our personal biographies?
The answer is this: the
mirror
of our own inner darkness and light...
Inside us the
double-complex - our feelings of judgment, our
temptations, our addictions and our sense of
failure. Inside us the darkness that belongs
personally to us, and outside us, carried to us by
the Culture of Media, the mirror of that darkness.
But also inside us the Good that we would author.
Think on it. Do we
not experience the images and sounds brought to us
by the Culture of Media as something that is
filled with what we like and we dislike? We live
our biographies and the Culture of Media confounds
our souls with pictures of dark and light to which
we all respond individually. The great masses of
humanity do not make the News. The great masses of
humanity experience the News.
What is News? News is
exactly what the reporters and television
personalities call it: stories. The Culture of Media provides us
stories (tales) of the world, which are often
presented as if these stories are true, something
most of us have come to know they are not. News
stories reflect all kinds of bias, and in some
cases the bias is deliberate. Moreover, news
stories reflect conditions of commerce living in
the agency reporting them.
For example, it is
well understood that in the last third of the 20th
Century in American television the news divisions
of the major networks disappeared, and the
entertainment divisions took over the
responsibility for the news. The opportunity to
inform and educate the receivers of news stories
became secondary to the need to keep them
interested so as to be able to sell commercial
time and make a profit. In addition, the stories
are mostly about dire and tragic events, and
little is investigated or reported that is about
the positive and the creative.
We are right then to
wonder sometimes about the News, about its harsh
nature and artless excessive attention to the dark
deeds of many. Humanity in general bears within it
the beam that is not seen, while the mote is exaggerated. But the world itself
is not this beam, is not this darkness. The
greater part of darkness is inside us - in our own
souls, and from there projected onto the world.
The Culture of Media exaggerates this darkness
further, at the same time it gives us much that
also arouses our own unredeemed antipathies and
sympathies.
Once more for
emphasis...
The world in its
reality is not this Media generated excess of
darkness (so out of balance with the light that is
also everywhere present), which we all project from within the soul - the
beam. Yet, in the Culture of Media this whole
processes of dark projection is exaggerated so
that the mirroring nature of the social world itself
begins to bother us. This logos
order of the social
world is complex and rich, and worth a deep study.
Pictures of a
distorted and untrue meaning of the world abound,
and while we share these pictures, we make
personal and individual our reactions. Just as the
intimate events of our biographies have a personal
meaning, so does the shared stage setting have a
personal meaning. In a more general sense, for
example, many Christians today are confronted, via
the Culture of Media, with pictures of individuals
whose actions as self-proclaimed Christians either
inspire us to imitation or cause us to turn away
in shame. The same is true in Islam. The terrorist
who frightens us in the West, also causes many
ordinary Muslims to turn away in horror.
Everywhere fundamentalism rises, to continue the
example, the great mass of humanity, that are not
so tied to such arid rigidity, shrink away in
antipathy. Do we not assert quietly, inwardly to
ourselves: this is not me, I
am not that - I will not be that!
In our biographies
then, we are confronted in the intimacy of our
personal relationships with what are sympathetic
and antipathetic reactions to that which we would
choose to admire and imitate, and that which we
would shun and refuse to be like. Via the Culture
of Media, we are met with that which approaches us
in the same way, yet on a larger scale. Just as we
as individuals have a Shadow (a double-complex),
so nations, religions and peoples have a Shadow,
and the Culture of Media puts in our faces these
pictures and meanings with which we can identify
or from which we can turn away, often in shame.
Christ has arranged,
in this particular moment in time (the cusp of the
20th to 21st Centuries, which is also the Dawn of
the Third Millennium) to place in the dying away
hierarchical social forms of humanity, those
biographies which do two main forming gestures
within that history. This is all connected to a
process in which social chaos arises in order to
cause these old hierarchical [third cultural age]
social structures to let go their no longer valid
hold, and in many instances be eventually replaced
with new social form arising out of the social
commons [fifth cultural age].
In the first
instance, these biographies living in the decadent
social hierarchies (such as government, corporate
and church organizations) portray strong images,
via the Culture of Media, to which we react
equally strongly out of our likes and dislikes.
For example, one of America’s wise women, Doris (Granny
D) Haddoch, has
said that we should be grateful for such as George
W. Bush, because he causes us to awake from our
sleep as citizens. As a consequence, in our
individual biographies we react to the extremes of
these dominant religious, business, cultural and
political personalities, and this brings about in
us as individuals certain inner judgments and
calls to action.
The second effect of
those biographies unfolding in the now decadent
institutional social hierarchies is to drive the
social order further into a needed condition of
chaos, something all 6 billion plus biographies
require in order to birth the moral dilemmas
necessary for the Age of the Consciousness Soul.
This social chaos sweeps traditional moral
authority aside, and forces us as individuals into
situations where we must rely on the own I in
order to properly face the moral crisis. In that
human beings are incarnating in massive karmic
communities in order to have these sometimes
shattering moral experiences, this causes the
present world social organism to have the strong
tendency to completely dissolve into a condition
of near total social conflagration [thus my
website: Shapes in the Fire].
The moral aspect of the logos ordered social organism of the world requires crisis in order for the individual biographies to live, not just intellectually, but fully and dynamically and existentially into dilemmas of moral choice. Only true moral choice can awaken in us what is offered in this Age to the development of the Consciousness Soul.
Nothing in the world
is not touched by the Art of Christ, who as Lord
of Karma - Lord of the Satisfaction of Moral Debt
and healer of karmic wounds, arranges in majestic
harmony all the biographies so that even from
the smallest detail to the grandest historical
event, meaning is put to the service of our
development - the leaving behind of our spiritual
childhood followed by our birth into spiritual
adulthood.
The world historical
crises of this time are a complex and rich Stage
Setting, against which 6 billion plus souls live
out the dramas of their individual biographies.
Thus, in this birth
from spiritual childhood to spiritual adulthood,
the Time - the Age of the Consciousness Soul - is
a Rite of Mystery, a Baptismal Mass for all of
humanity, just as was told to us by John the
Baptist. [in Matthew 3:11] “Now
I bathe you in the water to change hearts, but the
one coming after me is stronger than me: I’m not big
enough to carry his shoes. He
will bathe you in holy breath and fire.” (emphasis added)
Consider now more
closely what happens inside
us as we
experience the intimacy of our biographies, and
the shared pictures that come via the Culture of
Media.
Choice confronts us.
Do I be like that, or like this? From what place
inside do I choose? In a time so filled with chaos
that rules no longer apply, I discover that I can
rely only on myself. Out of myself I must author
the Good in response to the world of meaning that
surrounds and confronts me. So powerful, in its
personal immediacy, are these experiences, images
and meanings, that we cannot turn away from them.
It is as if the World itself is on Fire, wanting
to burn and burn and burn until we run from it in
terror, or stand up to it and give the fullest
of our participation to its moderation and its
healing.
Yet by Grace, I
contain the means to know the Good that my
biography and membership in the shared fate of
humanity draws out of me. What I source becomes a
part of the world, and I know that this is so. I
know my freedom to enact the moral grace that my
heart comprehends in its deepest places. Deep
inside my soul my very own heart hungers to sing:
Love will I give. Love will I
create. Love will I author.
So now we think away
the physical - the maya of the sense world, and let our
picture thinking gaze only upon this inner,
invisible to the physical eye, moral act. An act
more and more emerging everywhere, for while in
America, and the Cultural West, the Consciousness
Soul is first widely appearing, it will and must
appear everywhere that human beings let the world
touch their wounds, while they seek to share with
others the trials by fire of their biographies.
Invited by the Love
and Art of Divine Circumstance to look within and
to reach into the depths of our own being in order
to source and author that Good which we know to be
right, we touch something spiritual and are
Touched by something Spiritual. In this time of
the True Second Coming, in the inwardness of our
souls and invisible to all outer seeing, a Second
Eucharist is being enacted - the Good offers
Itself - Its own Being - to us (Moral
Grace). For the
Good we know is not just known in the soul as what
we tend to think of as a mere thought, but if we
attend most carefully, it is true Spirit, just as
the John Gospel writer told us that Christ spoke:
[John 3:6-8] “What’s born of
the flesh is flesh, and what’s born of the breath is
breath. Don’t be amazed because I told you you have
to be born again. The wind blows where it will and
you hear the sound of it, but you don’t know where
it comes from or where it goes; its the same with
everyone born of the breath.”
[The existence of a
Second Eucharist, to accompany the Second Coming,
in no way means to diminish or change the Original
Eucharist. On the contrary, we will find that via
the Second Eucharist our understanding
of the meaning of
the Original Eucharist (the transubstantiation of
matter) will deepen. See in this regard, the small
pamphlet: Radiant matter:
Decay and Consecration, by Georg Blattmann. From the
transubstantiation of matter we are being led
onward to learning how to participate also in a
transubstantiation of thought.]
Thus we are being
truly and continuously born again today (each act
of moral grace is another Second Ethereal
Eucharist and birth), from out of our spiritual
childhood and into our spiritual adulthood,
baptized outwardly by the fires of the times in
our biographies, and by holy breath within - a
Second Eucharist where Christ gives of His own
Substance that biblical knowing of the Good - His
own Being. For us to truly know the Good, requires
we join our own soul to the Good. Our yearning to
author the Good out of ourselves is how we
participate in the Baptism of being truly born again, and how we participate
in the sacrament of the Second Eucharist. Christ
also participates by giving to us, out of Himself,
this very Good - this Moral Grace. When having
received within ourselves this sacrament of the
Second Eucharist, an act that only arises because
we seek it and form its actual application, we
remain free - we create moral law - we author the
fulfillment of the law and the prophets. Given to
us within by Christ as a capacity, we then author
its incarnate nature and pass it on to the world
of our biographies, - from out of us thence into
the outer world (or into the inner world), do we
then ourselves author this Good: love
engendered free moral grace.
But how does Christ
do this? Is this Good offered to us in this Second
Sacrament as if it was a thing, passed by hand
from one to another?
No. Christ as holy
breath breathes upon the slumbering burning embers
of our own good nature, just as we breath upon a
tiny fire in order to increase its power. He
sacrifices His Being into this breath, which gives
Life to the tiny ember-like fire of our moral
heart. The holy breath becomes within the soul of
each human being who asks, seeks and knocks a gift
of Living Warmth that enlivens our own free fire of moral will.
The Narrow Gate opens
both ways, making possible thereby the intimate
dialog and conversation of moral deeds and
thoughts that is woven between the i-AM, the Thou and the Christ (wherever
two or more are gathered...), which intimate conversation
leads ultimately to the consecration - the character development - of the
soul.
In this way our
thinking can now behold the
Meaning
of Earth Existence in the Age of the Consciousness
Soul: A
macro-cosmic Rite, a Second Ethereal Eucharist, in
which we give birth out of ourselves in the most
intimate way possible, knowledge of the Good, not
as mere thought, but as Life filled moral will,
breathed into greater power by the sacrifice of
the true ethereal substance of Christ’s Being in
the form of holy breath.
The outer world is
but a seeming, and what is brought by the Culture
of Media mere pictures of the Stage Setting for
the World Temple that is home to our biographies.
When we think away this outer seeming - this logos
formed and maya based sense world, and concentrate only on the Idea of the moral grace (Life filled holy
breath) we receive and then enact out of the wind
warmed fire of individual moral will - as
individual law givers, as the fulfillment of the
law and the prophets - we
create this Meaning
of Earth Existence.
Every act of moral grace, given greater Life
within in the deepest intimacy of our life of
soul, is an ethereal communion with Christ, even
though we may only experience it as what to us is
a mere thought of what is the Good at some moment
of need in the biography.
Christ gives us this
Gift, by Grace, freely out of Love, and with no
need that we see Him as its Author. We hunger
inwardly to know what the right thing to do is,
and when this hungering is authentic, we receive
Christ’s Holy Breath. This does not come so much
as a thought-picture of the Good in response to
our questing spirit, but rather as the contentless breathing substance of Christ’s
Being. We are touched (inspired) by Love, and at
this touch we
shape that Breath
into the thought that we then know. The nature of
its application and form in which we incarnate
this thought is entirely our own. We shape the
thought completely out of our own freedom - our
own moral fire of will, for only we can apply it
accurately in the individual circumstances of our
lives.
As the Age of the
Consciousness Soul unfolds accompanied by this
Second Eucharist, the Social World of human
relationships begins to light and warm from
within. For each free act of moral grace rests
upon this Gift of Christ’s Being to us - an
ethereal substance received in the communion
within the Temple of the own Soul, freely given in
Love whenever we genuinely: ask,
seek and knock during our search for the Good. Our participation in this Rite,
this trial by Fire leavened by Holy Breath, leads
us to the co-creation of new light and new warmth
- the delicate budding and growing point of
co-participated moral deeds out of which the New
Jerusalem is slowly being born.
This co-creation is
entirely inward, a slowly dawning Sun within the
macro Invisible World of Spirit. Moreover, we do
it collectively (as humanity). While each of us
contributes our part, it is our collective
conscious celebration of the Second Ethereal
Eucharist (creating the Good) that begins the
transubstantiation of the collective (presently
materialized and fallen) thought-world of humanity
into the New Jerusalem.
Thought is real, and
it is as equally real as is matter. The Original
Eucharist transforms the already divinely given
now-dying substance of earthly matter into
Life-filled Spirit through our ritual
invitation of the
active Grace of the Divine Mystery; and, our
participation in the Second Ethereal Eucharist
transforms dead thought into living ethereal
Substance, through the mystery of our individual
spirit’s active and embryonic grace, that becomes
united into the collective co-creation of
humanity.
In the Invisible
World of Spirit, we co-participate, out of the own
moral fire of will, in the Dawn of the New Sun
that is to become the New Jerusalem.
Let us now slow down
here for a moment, and take a deep breath, for
these last thoughts above may seem almost too big - too
idealistic - to be easily contemplated. To ease
our understanding and gently ground it, let us
consider this situation once again in it most
ordinary aspects.
The world of our
biographies places each individual into the fires
of experience.
These are remarkable gifts that lead us toward
moral questions - often deep and troubling. We
yearn to know what to do, and in this circumstance
we may ask, seek and knock. What has been called earlier in
this book Moral Grace is available to us, yet the
mystery of this practice of inner activity
is where we ourselves create moral law - where we become the
fulfillment of the law and the prophets.
In the King’s Tale,
we saw that Rudolf Steiner’s book The
Philosophy
of Spiritual Activity showed how to come to this knowledge
through the practices of Gnosis - to knowledge - in the form of moral imagination,
moral intuition and moral technique. In the
Healers’ Tale, we saw how the 12 Steps helped us
to master the soul through the elevation of the
spirit, and in this way come to know God’s Will as
we understand
it. Finally, in the
Shepherd’s Tale we came to understand that by
asking What Would Jesus Do out of Faith, we could also come to
the needed individual moral beliefs.
Three different paths
(among perhaps many more) all leading to those
individual invisible depths that each of us must
uniquely experience, which we have now seen must
be properly called: the
Second Eucharist of Holy Breath. So we come now to perceive the Time
- this Age of the Consciousness Soul - where, if
we seek it, we have made ourselves available to be
baptized with Fire and Holy
Breath, just as
John the Baptist us told Christ would do, 2000
years ago.
Even so, we still have to truly want
to know the Good - to authentically
ask, seek and knock.