Various Materials used during campaign
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
invitation letter for April 16th
meeting
Dear Friend,
This letter is coming from someone who is just
entering the field of public service for the first time, at age
64. While I am running for Mayor of Prescott in the Fall election
cycle of 2005, I am not writing this letter seeking only for your
community's votes. Rather I am inviting your community to
send someone (or a small group) to a meeting I am sponsoring, which I
believe you might well want attended, once you understand its purposes.
Now does this mean I wouldn't appreciate your
community's votes come the Fall? Of course I would, but at the
same time, I believe I need to earn such votes, not by words but by
deeds. I don't want votes because I say things people want to
hear, but because I do things people value, and which suggest clearly
what they can expect of me in office. I only want to be elected
to an office of public service, by doing from the beginning, right in
the campaign, deeds of public service.
For these reasons, the following is the main theme
and activity of my campaign for office.
In looking over recent political affairs in the
United States, I have become concerned with the divisions into which
our political leaders have often forced us, with what their campaign
managers call: wedge issues. The very purpose of wedge issues is
to separate us into small emotionally involved groups, so that it is
easier to hook us into believing that the politician being served by
this form of political activity (wedge issues), believes strongly in
such an issue, and that they should therefore receive our vote, all
other considerations aside.
This practice ill serves us as a whole community -
as a People.
From this activity too much hate-like emotional
energy has been fostered, such that one group so profoundly dislikes
and misunderstands the other, that we almost fail to see each other
anymore as human. The fact is that whatever the future is to
bring, we will have to face it together, and the wisdom that Lincoln
paraphrased from Matthew 12:25: "a house divided against itself cannot
stand," needs to receive our utmost attention as we walk together into
our shared political future.
For this reason, the main effort of my campaign is
not my own election, but to do what I can in a concrete fashion to help
bring the citizens of Prescott closer together as a community. In
addition, I hope also to work at discovering what it is that those who
are not participating (the many who do not vote or even register to
vote) need in order to believe again in our representative form of
government.
As a first step on this path, my campaign is
sponsoring a community meeting to take place on Saturday, April 16th,
at the Granite Peak Unitarian Church sanctuary, between 10 am and Noon
. The form of the meeting is as follows:
I will make some opening remarks (at most about
15-20 minutes) concerning a brief history of the Republic and its
current state (a kind of citizen's State of the Union), with an
emphasis on the importance for the future of citizen participation, or
what I call: Citizen Governance. Following this, the audience
will be invited to speak to each other, to share their concerns, and to
begin to heal out of their own honesty and efforts, the divisions
forced upon us by the ambitions of far too many politicians.
The conversation will be directed toward an end, to
a degree. The hope for that end is that after some straight talk
encounters with each other, those attending will be willing to join
more long lasting groups, perhaps networked to each other, so that the
conversation can continue, and people can find a common basis for
action and participation.
Since we are at the very
beginning of something, it is difficult to imagine what might arise,
but it is my belief that we can not only have regular meetings in which
we share our concerns and intelligence, but create networks of these
meetings, so that the whole can become greater than the sum of the
parts. Each small group can produce material that it shares with
other groups, along independently created lines of communication, so
that, in effect, we give birth in Prescott to a true people-based
alternative media. Instead of being dependent upon TV or the
local paper, we create our own means of internal communication for the
purpose of strengthening our sense of community. Further, the
edges of this network can be open toward receiving material from, and
communicating with, those who live outside the official boundaries of
Prescott.
Each group, or individual,
can be a source of ideas and wisdom, and the network can transmit, only
that which it finds helpful. Each node or group can pass on, or
not, according to how it values what it has received. In this
way, only those materials which serve the whole will succeed in
reaching the complete network of groups and individuals. Groups
who want to divide, or accuse, or dismiss, will find their work not
being passed along. Those who work more positively, and with the
goal of serving the whole, will find their material spreading easily
within the community.
Since the transmission
pathways will not themselves be organized, material can arrive at the
same places through quite independent routes. Questions and
additions can be passed back and forth. Groups can invite other
groups to larger meetings, resolve conflicts and then create new
material to offer to the whole. In a way, this is very much like
the open source model which has been so successful on the internet (for
those who have heard of this work). We are here just copying this
already proven method of building something viable out of the free
initiative of interconnected individual and group sources.
For those who cannot for their own reasons attend
the meeting on the 16th, I remain available to come to any venue at
anytime between now and the Fall elections, to speak about and
participate in those activities that can help us heal these
divisions. I welcome invitations and suggestions, and can be
contacted via e-mail at: campaign@ipwebdev.com.
For those who want to know more about me, with some
details, here is the url to the website I have prepared for this
campaign. http://ipwebdev.com/hermit/mayor2.html.
Please understand - yes I am running for office,
something I believe citizens must more and more do, for politicians
have failed us in too many ways. At the same time, I want my
campaign to itself be a service, instead of just a series of efforts at
persuasion coupled with a lot of vague promises. Too much is at
stake for us to continue to follow the old ways.
Also understand that the healing of our community,
from the divisive use of too many wedge issues, cannot be done by any
one person or group. We are many, and as many we need to come
together to share the work of rediscovering who we can be as a
whole. Only "We the People" can reach toward Lincoln's hope that
"government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not
perish from this earth".
sincerely yours,
Joel A. Wendt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
invitation template
an invitation to a
conversation
How ordinary Citizens can start to make
politicians dance to our tune, from the
Local to the State and National levels
or
Citizen Governance: and the future
of the American Republic
please come on
Saturday, April 16th, 2005,
to the Granite Peak
Unitarian Church, 882 Sunset Ave,
Prescott (behind the True Value on
Miller Valley Road)
from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM
in the Sanctuary
sponsored by the
Joel A. Wendt for Mayor of Prescott
campaign committee
campaign@ipwebdev.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
opening talk, iteration two
The State of the Union is terrible. We suffer
from a number of serious maladies. As a People we have not
paid enough attention, and many of us are still very much asleep or
living in illusions. Our political leaders ill serve us, being
addicted to power and privilege in far too many cases, such that they
serve only corporate masters, and no longer the Republic.
I think, in fact, if George Bush or Dick Chaney was
asked to explain the ideas on which our form of government, our
democratically elected Constitutional Republic was based, they couldn't
do it. And they'd not be the only ones - there are a lot of
Senators and Congress-people who wouldn't do any better, just as their
are few citizens, few corporate officers, and few members of the Media
who anymore understand our form of government.
But neither we nor the politicians are the worst
actors. Far worse yet are the Lords of Finance, the
plutocracy of concentrated wealth which has for far too long had only
its profits and powers in mind, and had no compunction in using this
advantage to the destruction of the Republic and the undermining of our
freedoms. Like most Nations in dire straits, we have nearly
succumbed to an enemy within, not to an enemy without.
But worse than all these - worse than our own sleep,
the arrogance of the politicians, and the callus indifference of the
tyranny of concentrated wealth - is the so-called Free Press.
When the Bill of Rights was authored, a Free Press was among the
highest rights they had in mind, when it was written that Congress
shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.
It was a free and raucous, even anarchistic press
that was on their minds. Why? Because the Republic is an
Idea, and as long as we have a vital and even obnoxious discussion of
ideas, we will keep our freedoms, and our Constitutional
Republic. But that was not to be.
The individuals who write the words in papers, and
speak the words on TV, found themselves getting rich, and worse yet, in
love with their own opinions. Truth is word no longer in their
dictionaries. And, decade by decade in the Twentieth Century, the
Press gave away its sense of the ideals of the Republic, in exchange
for membership in elite classes, invitations to Davros, leaks from the
White House, and what is worst - the seduction of celebrity.
As a consequence, we cannot find on the News any
sense of the reality. Lets just give one blatant example: In 1992
the neo-cons published a paper in which they asserted the need for
American military bases in the middle-East, with Iraq as a prime
target, and with empire building as their stated goal. In the run
up to the war, and since, this fact has been ignored, and what is
worse, few Americans know that one of the main activities in Iraq has
been the building of this permanent intended military presence, begin
paid for by our taxes, and our children's lives.
We have a government with an obvious secret agenda,
and no word of this reaches our ears, something so at odds with all the
lies that have been told, that the Press should speak and write of it
every single day and night.
How can we vote - how can we make the proper
judgments that go with our responsibilities as citizens, when the truth
is withheld? And, that is just one example.
We have a similar problem in Prescott. A Mayor
and City Council so unable to distinguish itself from the corporate
interests and appreciate its duties to the public, that an egregious
breach of trust occurred when the Granite Dells annexation agreement
was signed. A Press, so asleep at the switch that if it wasn't
for a couple of accidental investigations of private citizens, we'd
have no idea what was going on, what was planned and what of our taxes
and water was given away to private developers.
Now there are two choices we can take here with
respect to our politicians. It was, if knowledgeable, malfeasance
of the worst kind; and if done in ignorance, then it was gross
incompetence. As to the offending corporations, they have not
only harmed our government and our trust, but they have harmed their
companions in the business world - the ones who are willing to play by
the rules. No longer can we trust developers not to take as much
advantage of the taxpayer as possible.
Now our shared public life, even local politics, is
not unaffected by the wider issues. Our local politics is
like a local condition in much wider elementary weather and
climate. What goes on in Washington and Phoenix effects us
here. This is why I point it out, while at the same time trying
to remind us that we still can do things locally of great value.
However, there is an impediment to this - which is
the divisions fostered on us by the last national election where wedge
issues of little relevance to our real problems were used to divide us,
one against the other - Republican against Democrat, Christian against
progressive, supporters of business against workers. The uses of
the issues of abortion and gay rights, while deep social problems that
need addressing, are not to be solved by law. No law has ever
made someone moral. But the politicians gain advantage with these
wedge issues, and by this sleezy approach to public life, bring ruin to
the processes of rational discourse necessary for our Constitutional
Republic to survive the assaults on its very foundations.
We cannot expect the politician to give up his
addiction to this shameful divisive rhetoric, until we ourselves set
the right example. We must overcome these divisions...
difference does not mean one is right and the other wrong...both are
right...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
opening talk, iteration
one
Hi,
My name is Joel Wendt, and I'm running for Mayor of
Prescott. As you can see we are a good-sized crowd today, and I
have to think that it isn't because of my personality, since most of
you don't know me or have never met me. I think, instead, that
what's brought you here is something that I wrote, something about the
power of citizens in a political world that has gotten less and less
sane over the years.
Less and less sane. Exactly. There is
something rotten in Washington, and in Phoenix, and even in Prescott,
and we all know it, but can't quite put our finger on it. Its out
of whack, out of tune, and it grates on our political nerves.
Now just so it is clear, let me say this right in
the beginning. I'd like you to look around the room and at each
other, and realize that we here are the government. When all is
said and done and the chickens come home to roost, they roost on our
doorstep. Whatever else can be said about the insanity in modern
politics, we've been electing these people for a lot of years, and we
need to own up to our responsibility.
That said, let me sketch out this meeting for you
once more, so it is as clear as possible. I'm going to share with
you my views, my citizen's State of the Union so to speak. If you
are going to bother to consider me for Mayor, you have a right to know
what I think. When I get done with that, you get to talk, but
there will be some rules, and I'll get to those when the time comes.
As to a citizen's State of the Union, lets get to it.
There's some good news and some bad news. I'm
going to do the bad news first, and for many of you it will be far
worse than you've thought possible. You might even get angry at
me, because you are going to want to be in denial, or think I'm nuts
for saying the things I am going to say. Maybe you will want to
walk out. Okay by me, but then you'll miss the good news, and the
good news is very cool, very very cool. It far out weighs the bad
news, and its the kind of thing you don't hear about in the Media which
not only doesn't give us the real bad news, it doesn't actually give us
much of anything. Kind of junk candy for the mind is what you get
from Media, unless its Fox, in which case they're mostly just
propaganda anyway.
That said, lets start with some of the worst of
it. In my view of things, we don't have a legitimate government
in Washington. They stole the election in 2000, and they did it
again in 2004. They are not only thieves, they are incompetent as
well. They've destroyed the military, bankrupted the treasury,
and told so many lies that everyone's head just spins trying to catch
up to the last one, much less take in the newest one.
The thing is they didn't do this in a vacuum.
The Republicans and the Democrats have created (and allowed) a
political culture to arise in Washington that is addicted to money and
lies, so much so that even the nice ones can hardly find a place to
rise out of that amoral swampland.
Now even if you only buy a tenth of what I am
saying, those of you who want to think about this might wonder how the
heck this came about. This is important, because understanding
how to fix it, requires we understand how it got wrong. So we
have to do some history, and because I am a bit of a philosopher by
nature, the reason I am reading something I wrote, is to make sure I do
this briefly instead of wandering off into details. If I gave a
spontaneous lecture we'd be here 'til Tuesday.
Before the United States, most governments in
Western Civilization were aristocracies of blood. Kings and
Queens and lines of descent, and power was vested in these families,
and it was a power often without any restraint or limits. Well,
like anything of this nature, it got too in love with itself, and Kings
and Queens got more and more arrogant, such that they squeezed too
hard, and finally got the rebellion they deserved.
Now the root of this rebellion was in something that
lived in ordinary people for a long time - a sense of oppression and
powerlessness. At the time of the American Revolution, it
was upper classes, large land owners etc. who were also feeling
oppressed, and so this resistance to oppression found champions among
the elites to go with the champions among the ordinary. Together,
they rebelled and gave birth to our democratically elected
Constitutional Republic.
When the Constitution was finished, someone like
Franklin is supposed to have said, coming out of the Hall: "Well,
you've got your Republic if you can keep it".
Now what did he mean by that?
Well, the fact was that the creation of the
Constitution was a battleground between those interested in the
highest freedoms for all (except: women, slaves and Indians, but these
were just details, right?), and those who had large property rights at
stake, and did not want anything to interfere with their wealth, or the
acquisition of more wealth.
Now what happened, to make a really long story very
short, was that the aristocracies of blood were not succeeded by a
truly free people, but by an aristocracy of wealth. The Republic
did exist for a time, but by the Civil War it was in eclipse, and when
Lincoln fought with the bankers over the financing of the War (they
wanted 28% interest), Lincoln refused and created the first federal
currency - Lincoln Greenbacks. The Lords of Finance did not like
this - for up to that time currency, then called species, was the
province of banks not of governments.
The Lords of Finance fought back, sometimes in your
face, but also often under the table and out of sight. They
didn't want governments messing around with markets and other ways the
rich made more money, so they invented Central Banking and got our
(emphasis on our) Congress to create the Federal Reserve which gave to
a private banking organization the monetary power that under the then
understood rules of political economy, belonged to the government,
which in the USA, means it was an aspect of the sovereignty of the
People.
That's right, the Federal Reserve is a theft of our
national sovereignty, done right in front of us and for the sole
benefit of the elites of concentrated wealth. Central Banking was
then exported all over the world, such that today the Lords of Finance
hold powers which overshadow our freedoms to a great degree.
Basically we live in a tyranny of concentrated wealth on a scale it is
hard to imagine.
Most of what we are taught about economics is a lie,
for example. To avoid some details, let me just tell you a little
story. Some friends and I had a small study group on economics in
New England in the '90s, and a gentleman who worked for the Federal
Reserve Bank in Boston came to speak to our group and said two very
disturbing things. First, he said that there were about 40,000
CEO's of financial institutions in this country, and perhaps 40 of them
understood the real rules of money and finance. Second, he said
that the real rules could be explained on TV in about an hour and a
half, and if that was done, by morning all the banks would have been
burned to the ground.
The money the Fed prints is fake - it has no real
value anymore. Its main use in the last couple of decades
has been to create endless consumer credit for the purpose of tying us
down with enormous debt. American's have been seduced with a high
standard of living, easy money, and to go with that corruption, fake
news so that we don't really understand our impact on the world or how
the world feels about us.
Now if you think I am talking conspiracies here, you
are right. But believe me when I say that history is just a story
of one conspiracy after another, with a lot of amoral people taking as
much advantage as they could in terms of acquiring wealth and
power. Lies are so ordinary now in the mouths of politicians,
that they even believe them themselves. They call lies spin
today, which is a lie about lies of all things.
Anyway, money rules, and money corrupts and
Washington is corrupted to the core, so that it becomes easy to steal
elections and lie to the people all in the normal course of
business. If there is a basic rule it is this: never believe what
a politician or a rich man says. Notice only what they do, what
are their deeds, and on that basis make your judgments.
So what's wrong with the world. Well, it comes
down to this: The seeking after power and wealth is a very short term
competition, such that no one really thinks very carefully about
tomorrow, except to lay the ground work for more power and
wealth. The result is that everything is falling apart, because
no true impulse to stewardship was exercised. The people in power
cared more about their power than the consequences, and so like the
parasites that they are, they have eaten the life blood out of the body
politic and now we find ourselves amidst decay and rot and the stink is
getting so strong it is starting to make us wake up.
All that said, which is very little, it is but a
part of a much larger whole. I could easily speak of the deeds of
the Lords of Finance over the last 200 years, in ways that would cause
the hair on the back of your necks to rise. Some of you, who
might have been reading The Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, are
getting from this book more of the truth about how these folks rule the
world, and with what outrageously selfishness and callousness.
The fact is that I've hardly touched the surface of the reality of the
tyranny of concentrated wealth.
For a long time now, they have had too much control
over our government, and abused that power to make all the basic
economic rules to their sole advantage, making quite real what we have
for generations now called: wage slavery.
By the way, this condition is natural. It is
how history goes. Wealth and privilege seek power to continue
their domination, which is why Franklin said: "if you can keep it."
So, lets get the good news.
When the Founders got done with the Constitution
they had achieved something remarkable, which the Lords of Finance
would like us not to notice. The Founders had not only made real
the ideal that the only just powers of government come from the consent
of the governed, they had, in writing the Constitution, created legal
precedent. They said "We the People do ordain and establish", and
they said "that powers not expressly delegated are reserved to the
people". The Arizona State constitution has the same basic idea,
and even the Charter of the City of Prescott flows from the same
principle. The fundamental rule is that any power a government
can exercise comes from us, and it is a temporary grant which we can
withdraw at any time we choose. We are the ultimate power, not
politicians or the Lords of Finance.
Think about it. I mean seriously think about
it. Say to yourself, I am the power. We are the
power. Make it your mantra when you watch the news and read of
some more political stupidity or thievery.
See the thing is that the same arrogance that led
the aristocracies of blood to produce rebellion, has led to excesses by
the aristocracies of wealth, that also are producing rebellion.
Like that office worker in Tiananmen Square in China, who stood in
front of that tank, and let us remember, stopped it, because the driver
was also a man of conscience - we have enormous power if we just take
hold of it and use it.
Now locally we do it with the Reasonable Growth
Initiative. We can also do it by replacing as many members of the
old political guard as possible. Those folks are too stuck in
dead thinking, and the old-boy networks of favors. They think we
can keep doing the same thing over and over again, even if it isn't
working, which is Einstein's definition of insanity.
But what's the main thing here? The main thing
is that citizens have to become active. As long as we are
passive, we get what such passivity deserves - that is ending up food
for the economic vampires - the callus monsters who think they know
best, when what they mean by best is what makes them wealthy.
It might seem that this is a horrible mess, but I
think not, so let me tell you how it works and that what we do to fix
it is basically a very small thing. We don't have to lift the
whole mess and heal it tomorrow, we just take a part, and do it right,
and because we are many, the lifting of the whole is much easier than
we might think.
The Lords of Finance, and their political lackeys,
get away with what they do because of the lies. Its like in the
Wizard of Oz - we need to see the fake wizard behind the screen and
then he looses his powers.
So the politician lies, and the Lords of Finance
lie, and the media, which belong to the Lords of Finance repeats the
lies over and over again as if they were the truth. It isn't, by
the way, that the truth is not out there, we just have to work for it -
we have to separate the wheat from the chaff and actually want the
truth. A lot of us like to live in our opinions, which are not
the truth, and a lot of us like to believe our favorite politicians,
which is understandable, but it is a trust badly placed. The
truth takes some work to get at, and if we aren't willing to do that
work then we will not only get what we deserve, we'll bequeath that
mess to our children.
For example, we believe incorrectly, that our main
role in our democratic Constitutional Republic is to vote. This
is not so, and was not how the Founders saw it either. We are to
participate, as much as possible, in the conversation that precedes the
vote. It is that public dialog which is the essential thing, with
the vote being the last emphatic act. But as things are done now,
with the money given by the Lords of Finance to both political parties,
the public dialog is warped into a great sea of confusion,
mis-information, and untruth. Complex matters are
oversimplified. Matters of character mis-represented and
hidden. Issues not germaine to our actual social reality are
emphasized, while the core problems ignored. Hate is encouraged,
and our people divided. The loudest and the noisiest are given
voice, while the sanest and deepest go unheard.
Our work is to take back the conversation and return
it to sane and rational discourse. We do that locally at first,
and in this we can be assured that we here in Prescott are not acting
alone. Elsewhere many others are waking up and realizing that
more of the same old politics will destroy us. There are issues
about which we just need real information, such as the Granite Dells
development deal, and there are issues which are philosophical, such as
the conflict between private property rights and basic human needs.
To work on these we need to talk to each other, and
to talk to each other we need lines of communication - that is our own
means or media systems, which can't be controlled by the Lords of
Finance. So that's what is going to happen here, next. We
(mostly you) are going to talk to each other, and then if you notice
around the edges of the room, will be sign up sheets and materials
designed to help us make more viable the lines of communication, so
that our conversation with each other continues after this meeting and
becomes the power by which we slowly and surely take hold of and define
the public discourse on terms other than the Lords of Finance and their
politician servants want.
So what's at issue here? Something normal in a
way - those with money use it to gain political power, and in the
process corrupt our political processes - that is tempt our elected
officials into abusing our trust. This is true on the large stage
of world and national history, and it is true locally as well. If
we don't want this to continue, what can we do about it?
It is a question of power, and we have to seize
it. It doesn't come by itself. So now you have the
question. What are you going to do? As a public servant all
I can do is point the way and suggest: maybe you want to go this
way. After that, if you don't go, if you instead go home and back
to sleep in front of the TV, then we all we suffer. But you know
what? I don't think that is going to happen, because every time
the American People had to stand up and be counted, they not only
did that, they did it with such vitality and power that we astounded
the whole world. So what is it going to be?
=====================================================================
While you are thinking on that, here is the rules
for the conversation. You'll see that we are now setting some
empty chairs in the center of our horseshoe like circle. Those
who want to speak, should come and sit in one of these chairs. If
there needs to be a line lets form it over there. When you are in
the inner circle, I am going to hand to one of you what is called the
talking stick. This is a Native American idea for helping
conversation. The one who holds the talking stick, gets to speak,
the rest listen. When done, the stick is passed to the next
person, and also when done, you should also leave the inner circle, and
the next person in line can have your seat. In this way, as the
talking stick moves around the inner circle, those finished speaking
will leave and those waiting will sit.
I am going to encourage you not to make long
speeches. The best would be to say all or part of your name, and
something on the order of Wendt is nuts or not, and then how you feel,
what most concerns you and what you want. Keep it simple and from
the heart and that way most of those here will get a chance to
speak. Remember this is just the beginning of something which I
hope will grow and become much more as we practice our conversations
and build our interconnections.
If you need to leave early, please quietly go by the
tables and sign up where you want, and take whatever papers you
need. We'll see that everyone on a list gets a copy of the list
and help getting connected. In this way we begin the work, and
what is to happen later will come to you according to how you signed up
(or not).
We are obligated to give up this room at Noon, and
I'll give a ten minutes notice. As to asking me questions,
lets leave that separate from this part where you speak to each other -
that is when you speak don't ask me questions, but keep in mind I'll be
outside after Noon and can be yelled at then. Also the sign up
lists create future meeting possibilities for those who want
them. Thank you for coming and now lets hear from this person to
begin.