COUNTER-MOVEs
... finding victory in the war the
rich are making upon the poor ...
by Joel A. Wendt
social
philosopher and occasional fool
INTRODUCTION
This essay makes a very large assumption, which is a bit
complicated, but which can be stated as follows ... (several
paragraphs) ...
Much that happens in the world today is strongly
influenced by certain groups of human beings who look upon the life
conditions of most of the people in the world with a great deal of
callous indifference, ... i.e. they could care less what happens to us
(economic and social collateral damage) as they battle among themselves
for dominance. All the same, some, who don't think very clearly,
might consider that what is to be said in the long essay that
follows is the work of a conspiracy nut job. The
only problem with this point of view is that it is history itself that
teaches of conspiracies, and someone who insists there are no such
groups at work in the social-political world of humanity is living in a
fantasy world.
Conspiracies have always existed where power was to be
fought over and where great wealth could be obtained through temporary
cooperation. Most members of a conspiracy don't need to
always have the shared ideology often thought, but in fact can share
only the historical understanding that a momentary association of power
and wealth hungry individuals and small groups can dominate for a time,
those who do not consciously combine their forces.
Conspiracies of this kind only require similar goals, and a
willingness to divide the spoils. Japan, Germany and Italy
cooperated to a degree during World War Two, not because of a shared
political ideology, but simply because it was useful for their own
goals. Russia, under Stalin, wouldn't cooperate and became an
enemy of the Axis powers for that reason.
On a smaller scale illegal and secret collusion were
common during the time of the robber barons in America, on the bridge
from the 19th to the 20th Century; and, recently such collusion
appeared in the cooperation among five major investment banks, who
worked together in an effort to dominate the still mostly unknown
derivative markets, where they bought and sold various
speculative instruments in the top end of the ponzi scheme that the
tame press keeps mislabeling the sub-prime loan crisis. In all
cases these activities were illegal (one of the reasons such
conspiracies hide their activities - if it was legal they would do it
right in front of everyone). That they don't get prosecuted for
such activities comes mostly from the corrupting effect and influence
large wealth has on government.
The difficulty with what might be called most kinds of conspiracy theory is that those who try to prove such things exist,
basically try to be too specific in the details, as if it was possible
to penetrate to the inner workings of something that was set up in the
first place to carefully hide itself. We don't have to go into
the specifics in order to perceive the conspiracy. We only
have to read the signs as it were, the tracks such activity leaves in
various actions taken by individuals, governments and businesses.
It is the same as when we observe patterns in the weather - this
enables us to anticipate a coming storm front. In a like fashion
then patterns in various social and political events reveals that
hidden associations, temporarily sharing common goals, are at
work behind the scenes.
There is also a kind of thinking of which we are aware
today, which can help us with this need we have to see behind the
scenes and deeper into the minds of those who with such callous
indifference can act so selfishly in the face of the suffering that is
caused others. A typical example of this callous
indifference was the recent crisis in Myanmar, where the ruling
military leaders (an obvious conspiracy of lawless individuals) cared
only for their own interests and let hundreds of thousands of their
people suffer and perish. We live in a world where this is
happening on a very large scale, with quite significant amounts of
power and wealth at stake. We need then to get inside the
minds of such groups, and the science that has explored this on a very
small scale is the kind of work that the behavioral science people in
the FBI do - that which is engaged in by those we call today profilers. This is dangerous work, by the way, for the soul that
lets itself think
like such inhuman willful lovers of evil,
exposes itself to all kinds of problems.
Yet, it is essential that such a process be enacted, in
spite of personal cost, for this is one of the keys to learning how to
perceive the patterns. If we think (momentarily and carefully)
with the same callous indifference as those who would rule us from
hidden places, we then develop a greater ability to discern among the
many detailed phenomena of modern life, the trail left behind by those
who would harm so many for such disgustingly selfish purposes.
In the long essay that follows I will tell the story of
what can be perceived, that is I will profile the dominant conspiracy actors who are willing to
sacrifice so many for so few. I do this not to identify them as
individuals, however. I do this so that we can see the detailed
nature of the war being waged upon ordinary people in the world today,
and from this understanding of the nature of this war, how we then may
make the Counter-Moves that limit the
effects of those who would so easily harm so many.
Certainly in this effort I will not be perfect. I
don't even expect to get it all right. I do, however, very much
want to do something that most conspiracy theorists do not do, namely
to offer solutions, not just a lot of negative hand wringing. It
isn't enough to perceive that lovers of evil seek to harm us, but we
have to understand that we don't have to stand passively by, and can in
fact engage in actions which limit and contain this harm.
At the same time, we need to realize that we cannot do
this with the idea in mind of achieving total victory of any kind.
A perfect world is not ours to obtain - that's a fantasy.
We can, however, ameliorate a great deal of what comes
toward us, by all kinds of activities, many of which are already in
place. By this I mean to suggest that we already make all kinds
of socially
healthy instinctive choices, which protect us
from this evil-loving callous indifference. We are not to
be overwhelmed, especially if we learn to perceive - to appreciate the profile - and form our own counter-associations, our own
communities and groups from which we draw the necessary spiritual and
psychological strength out of which our survival can be created (in
spite of what the dominant holders of wealth and power seek to achieve).
Those familiar with my other writings will know that
there are a number of different ways this can be approached, and here
in this long essay I am just coming at the situation of modern
existence from a particular point of view. There are many other
points of view from which our contemporary existence can be approached,
and I hope as we progress into the next years, people will seek out the
many other voices of wisdom that have much to offer to the shared
trials of humanity.
In my books, the Way of the Fool and American Anthroposophy for example, I discuss how we deal with such problems as individuals and communities, from inside our own soul and spiritual life. In my book Uncommon Sense I discuss what can be done in a more macro-social sense following the legal potentials hidden and unrecognized in the U. S. Constitution (in which this essay will be included in the appendix). I do the same in the book called: On the Nature of Public Life. Below I am going at this situation from again another direction, through the process of elaborating in great detail the patterns in our shared social and political existence left by those who want to dominate, and what these patterns can tell us that might be useful in support of our need to respond. The reader will get a clearer picture of what I mean here when we get into the actual details.
Joel A. Wendt, Summer 2008
ENTERING THE LOOKING GLASS
We need to begin with simple observations of various
phenomena. It is no use to immediately judge them or already
assume such phenomena "prove" the existence of any government and
business conspiracy. Let us just begin to assemble various facts,
and see if a pattern emerges all on its own.
For example, we could start anywhere, but I'd like to
start with something that was a detail of the 9/11 catastrophe, and
which precisely because it is still unresolved, could be very important
to note. This is the anthrax scare/panic that began,
according to reports, a week after September 11, 2001, supposedly on
September 18th. This attack was directed right at Congress
and was ongoing up to the time of the passage of the Patriot Act
(passed and signed into law by October 26th, 2001). Five people
were killed, and as many as two dozen injured, all mostly postal
workers or office workers. So we have 9/11, then a week
later the beginning of a bio-terrorism attack on Congress, during which
the Patriot Act is offered and then enacted into law.
The Patriot Act, at over 300 pages, could not have been
written following 9/11, but had to have substantial portions of it
already on the shelf, as it were, well before 9/11. Later,
as the Country more and more woke up to the reality of the Patriot Act,
legislators began to confess to never having read it. All of this
is carefully analyzed elsewhere on the Internet, but I do think it is
an interesting kind of fingerprint as it were, of a certain kind of
careful thinking, if we take the view that this whole scenario was engineered
in advance. Suppose you wanted to get certain laws enacted that
you wanted in place later for larger purposes in the near future.
Can you think of a better method for achieving this? The
law is ready, the time is right [9/11], and the final pressure to be
applied to Congress - a direct deadly attack - is commenced.
Eventually (seven years later), the main person of interest in the anthrax attack was exonerated in a civil judgment,
which awarded him substantial funds (a payment for his willing
collaboration in the attack and for being a suspect?).
Following this award, another supposed person of interest committed suicide, and then in the press was leaked all
kinds of facts supposedly in support his guilt. Now if I was the
case manager of this problem for the extremely wealthy and power
hungry, I would be glad to keep the public following one trail (certain
to eventually dead end) of explanation for the anthrax attacks, but not
so stupid as to think that would suffice. I'd have a back up
plan, and even better, a stooge. Thus, when the first person of interest was finally exonerated, I'd be able to not only
substitute a new one, but conveniently have him kill himself (right, if
you believe in the tooth fairy). At which point, the not very
bright press and mainstream media, after an appropriate flood of news
stories designed to convince the public, will consider the situation
ended.
About those assumed convincing stories, let me just give
one example. Recently it was reported that the FBI has discovered
the container in which traces of the exact matching anthrax spores
could be found. Here comes the kicker though, and the reader
should keep in mind the subtle nuance of the FBI report. The
container was found to have been in the suicide's possession. Note the word possession, and recognize that they do not say they found his fingerprints on the container - that is they have no evidence he
actually handled this container (anyone could have planted it in his
office or home or wherever).
Recently a new law was offered to Congress, and seems to
be well on its way to being passed. It advances an idea
contained in the Patriot Act, which basically so loosely and carelessly
defines domestic terrorism that what we have for years accepted as
honorable civil disobedience would be now criminalized to a high
degree, including giving the State extra power to investigate and
prosecute outside previous rules limiting the power of the State under
our Constitution. (HR 1955 titled the
Violent
Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007).
Another recent news story explains that the FBI is to be
given authority to open case files (and thus investigate with all their
powers) any American citizen at all, whether there are any facts
suggesting we should be suspicious. No evidence at all.
Just a desire in an investigating arm of the Government to
investigate someone.
In fact, if we look at the legislative history of the
last 30 or 40 years, especially when Republicans controlled Congress
and/or the White House, the State has more and more intruded into our
lives. This slow accretion, of the power of the State at the
expense of the citizen, has been noted by many. Some of the
deeper thinkers on this problem have compared this situation to the
story of the frog in the boiling water, who sitting in the very slowly
rising temperature never jumped out of the pot. We, to this
thinking, are that frog, and the boiling water is the slow erosion of
our civil rights. When we do eventually realize what has been
going on, it may well be to late.
Lets ask the question: Who, and for what reasons, might
want to achieve such an end? Who has something to gain if
American civil liberties are slowly dissolved, and replaced with more
and more central authority? Who could do this regardless of which
Party controlled the White House or Congress? Why would
they do this?
Lets take up another thread...
In recent years the problem called global warming has become a popular political issue.
Environmental degradation is nothing new, it was noticed many
decades ago in Rachel Carson's Silent
Spring, as well as other places. Acid
rain was another clue. The original Clean Air and Clean
Water acts were efforts to notice that the industrial revolution was
out of control and was having all manner of side-effects that were dangerous to the future. Is there anyone
who also might have known about this, but for seemingly obscure reasons
wanted to just let it continue (perhaps knew it couldn't be stopped),
but saw some way to take advantage of this situation?
We are also today more and more waking up to the reality
of banking and money, because of the ongoing economic crash. The
veil is being lifted, and many are starting to understand that the real
nature of the economy is not what we are told. More and more
people are looking at the creation of the Federal Reserve. Others
are noticing the meetings in Davros Switzerland, where elites of all
kinds gather. Google Bilderberger for a big can of worms going on
right in front of us. People of power and wealth meet, and
their collusion is becoming more and more obvious.
In my book, Uncommon
Sense, I write of what I call The
Lords
of Finance, who are a loose association
of the very very rich who sit at the top of the ponzi scheme that is
modern debt-money banking (Google Money as Debt for details). When you have a huge amount of
wealth, you can hire the very best for-hire minds, which we know of today as think tanks, of which the
earliest versions (that still exist today) were called: the
Trilateral Commission (Rockefeller banking money, mostly American in
nature) and the Council on Foreign Relations (Cecil Rhodes wealth, and
English banking money). There is a lot of research available on
the Internet on these institutions as well.
An image out of history is important here: bread and
circuses. The Roman Emperors, in the late (declining)
stages of their empire, knew that to keep the masses more or less
satisfied the Emperors had to provide minimal food, and significant
distractions (bread and circuses). We have that today in America.
Plenty of things, lots of food (denatured and unhealthy, but
those in charge don't actually care), and multiple distractions (TV,
movies, video games, shopping). What they don't want is a
culture, or a people, that is awake.
At the same time, many today are becoming aware that what
we are told about how the economy works is more like the dogmas of a
religion than the principles of a science. For example, how money
actually works has basically been completely hidden from the general
public knowledge. While we were told over and over again to have
faith in free markets (the prime economic religious mantra), the rulers
of the financial world knew that debt-money effectively enabled the
bankers to become parasites on the workers in all those economies where
central banks were the norm. The truth was that almost all
the money in circulation comes into existence as a debt on the spender.
It not only has no value, it really has a kind of negative value,
because every time the financial elites took out their very large blood
surplus for their own benefit, the debt on the rest of us increased.
Through complex misdirection, which had to be intentional
(why our economics teachers and scientists didn't notice this is a
quite remarkable unanswered question), it has never really been
explained to people in the Western Democracies just how money works,
what banks do, how they make money and dozens of other questions that
would have caused ordinary people to demand extraordinary controls over
the financial institutions on which we all depend. On a colossal
scale we've had the economic wool pulled over our eyes.
Now this was not always the case. Our Founders and
even Lincoln completely mistrusted the bankers (and the banks own
higher ups in the food chain of concentrated wealth), and battle lines
had been drawn as long ago as the very beginning of the Nation (see my Uncommon
Sense for details). Who would do this?
Why would they do this? Some of these questions are
also addressed there.
Let me summarize: One can have a fun ride getting at this information by reading Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle - 6 novels in three books for a total of 2700 pages, which is, among other marvelous things, an adventure saga covering the period in time in Europe from about 1670 to 1730, during which the basic directions of banking and finance were determined, as well as the basic directions of natural science.. During this period an understandable conflict arose between the aristocracies of blood (Kings and Queens etc.) and the emerging class of bankers and merchants. Kings and Queens kept ruining bankers and economies by their undisciplined impulses to start wars, borrow money they could not repay, and live high on the hog (so to speak). Great political and social power resided in hereditary blood. It was the dominant way the world was run in the West.
The bankers didn't like watching their wealth disappear
down the appetites of these elites of blood. When human beings
eventually began to throw over the elites of hereditary blood (the
American and French Revolutions), the arrangements of political power
became more fluid for a time, and thus it happened that as the U.S.
Constitution was formed, the banking elites worked hard to maintain a
place at the table of power. Hamilton was one of their main
representatives.
A second large battle between the impulses for a truly
free government of the people, by the people and for the people,
occurred during Lincoln's presidency. The bankers were reluctant
to loan money to the North for the Civil War (they want over 30%
interest). They had kept their ability under the
Constitution to issue specie (bank notes), but Lincoln understood the
danger to a point, and confounded them by issuing for the first time
government money (Lincoln Greenbacks) to finance the War.
Even so, the battle had been lost all the way back during
the time before even Stephenson's novel, when banks established the
right (by practice, more than by law) to lend more money than they had
on deposit. Understanding this is why runs on banks occur even
today. We know their actual current cash on hand resources don't
cover all their deposit obligations as these exist on paper.
With the Federal Reserve Act in the early part of the
20th Century, the banks finally won the main political battle, and
private Central Banks now became not only responsible for the money
supply and control of interest rates, but taxpayers had to pay all the
costs of the newly printed money in circulation. During this
period was already put in place the fake religion-like ideas about
money and banking, and this effort at illusion creation was
intensified. What would be kept secret in the cold hearts
of bankers, could be managed in a democracy as long as people falsely
believed they lived in a free society, and were taught to worship the
dark gods of the imaginary free market and to accept the rights of
wealth to take profit and property at the expense of persons.
At the beginning of the 20th Century, an elite now stood
well poised to control major macro economic decisions world wide.
These powers most strongly arose in Western Civilization, which
cultural influence was also the most adept at natural science.
Much of history in the last 120 years can be explained by a
conscious decision among the super elites of wealth and power in the
West to control the whole world economically (recall the Colonial and
Trading Empires). For example (a few among many possible
examples), English wealth helped the Russian Revolution start, in part
to give a second front in WWI, but for other reasons as well.
America, to continue the example, has sponsored a dictator in
Iraq (and other dictators) for years. Why?
Consider for a moment the conscienceless soul of a serial
killer - what is usually the subject of profiling. Imagine that
same conscienceless impulse coming awake in the blood lines of bankers.
Over time, this conscienceless impulse (moving in secret) rises
to the top of the successor aristocracy. An
aristocracy of wealth then covertly replaces the aristocracies of blood
at the table of real financial power, while the illusion of control
among the people of the Western Democracies becomes the main teaching
element in civics and other cultural influences that are subject to
manipulation and which create our world views.
If you look into the broad creation of public schools,
during those 120 or more years, you will discover that a prime goal was
to control urban youth, who otherwise (having little to do) tended to
lawlessness. Rural youth were excluded from the laws requiring
school attendance when needed on the farms, but in the cities the
truant officer was meant to be an agent of great social control.
Public schools were not really intended to educate (the elites
had their own private academies, many of which still exist all over New
England), but to give workers basic skills in reading, writing and
arithmetic.
We are fed a dream about how our social life is ruled
(we're a democracy we are told, after all we vote), and half asleep we
become the serfs and peasants of an aristocracy of wealth able to
purchase all the clever minds it needs in order to rule from secret.
Is there more?
- its for
the greater good -
First paragraphs from a column by Maureen Dowd in the Nov. 11th 2009 New York Times:
The Great
Vampire Squid has gotten religion.
In an
interview with The Sunday Times of London, the cocky chief of Goldman
Sachs said he understands that a lot of people are “mad and bent out of
shape” at blood-sucking banks.
“I know I
could slit my wrists and people would cheer,” Lloyd Blankfein, the
C.E.O., told the reporter John Arlidge.
But the
little people who are boiling simply don’t understand. And Rolling
Stone’s Matt Taibbi, who unforgettably labeled Goldman “a great vampire
squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its
blood funnel into anything that smells like money,” doesn’t understand.
Banks,
Blankfein explained, are really serving the greater good.
“We help
companies to grow by helping them to raise capital,” he said.
“Companies that grow create wealth. This, in turn, allows people to
have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. It’s a virtuous
cycle. We have a social purpose.”
When Arlidge asked whether it’s possible to make too much money, whether Goldman will ignore the people howling at the moon with rage and go on raking it in, getting richer than God, Blankfein grinned impishly and said he was “doing God’s work.”
Where did this gentleman get these ideas:
"its for the greater good" (whatever that means), and that he was
"doing God's work"?
Any evil seeks a self justification. The
pedophile believes he loves the child he rapes and abuses. Of his
own satisfaction he makes a kind of personal religion. This isn't
because of a need to salve conscience, but rather because each
individual world view has to have some degree of internal consistency.
Too large a paradox in the fundamentals of our personal world
view, and an uncontrolled insanity can be the result.
The callous indifference of the elites and super elites
of wealth needs a similar justification. We get glimpses of this
justification process when we recognize that there is some purpose to
such social forms as the Skull and Bones Society (Yale's elite
fraternity), or to the annual gatherings at the Bohemian Grove in
California (a gathering of already co-opted politicians, business
leaders and others). What we find out about these events is that
frequently there is a religious or rite-like ceremony as part of them.
Is there some psychological principle being applied here?
Most of us are familiar today with cults, and how a cult
works at brainwashing someone. Suppose that very very very smart
people were to do something similar, but far more sophisticated.
Not so much mind control, but nevertheless something that lets
them entice others with inducements that bring a needed degree of
submission to the will of those at the top, yet doesn't disturb to
openly (many so seduced like to be half asleep as well) the sense of
rightness of those who consent and agree.
Imagine, for example, potential future American business
and political leaders being awarded Rhodes Scholarships, and then going
to England, to Oxford, for advanced education. These individuals are themselves then profiled, and their weaknesses and strengths cataloged.
Those with the right psychological disposition are then drawn
further into the inner circles of extreme wealth and power.
Tempted with various kinds of addictions, some sexual, they
are shown that they can be princes of the world of the elites, and
satisfy any indulgence at will. Should they fall, or
otherwise act in such a way that they are noticed by the press, the
elites then show the ease with which they can kill any story, or
otherwise make their proteges immune from consequences.
Lets pause and consider the idea of addiction for a
moment. The greatest addiction is power. The addictions of
the senses - of the mind and of the feelings (heroin dreams, nicotine,
sex etc.) are small compared to addictions of the will - of unlimited
power to do whatever you want. A secondary aspect is, oddly, a
kind of love. Our culture of celebrity celebrates special people. They too get what they want. Think
now of Dick Chaney. Enormous secret power. Can help his
friends in the circles of wealth do almost anything they want in
government. He's not alone of course, but lets just focus our
profiling imagination of one person.
When he goes to the private homes of the elites, in
perhaps Virginia or at Aspen in Colorado, what is his experience when
he walks into a room. The most powerfully and secretive man on
the planet is adored by his surroundings as if he was a god and a great
hero.
To return to the process by which one joins this
worshiped and powerful elite...
At some point a special few are even made aware of the
slight of hand involved in the making of a fake economic religion, with
enough truth in it to explain much, but with the real effects and
benefits for the super elites still carefully hidden until the neophyte
inductee has so committed themselves that it would be suicidal to leave
the group. As many of these individuals will have intact
consciences (which like all of us, we can be induced to ignore it),
something has to be given to them that lets them believe in the
Way
of Wealth and Power.
We don't have to know exactly what was given. The
details are not important. I'll sketch some possibilities, but at
the same time will focus on religion-like social processes, because as
we all know, Western Civilization is strongly influenced by
Christianity, and so most people raised from their youth in Western
Culture will have certain values. They must be given a
justification for accepting their roles as princes who lie, without too
far disturbing their early church experiences and ideals. While
the super elites of the aristocracies of wealth will produce their
share of conscienceless individuals, most members of these groups will
need to become true believers in a religion-like world view that seems
itself to be superior, just as their life is to be superior as a member
of these high elites. This is the secret written in the phenomena
of the Skull and Bones rituals and the annual rituals enacted at
Bohemian Grove in California.
Extreme wealth is able to purchase anything that is for
sale, whether the price is wealth, or power or something perhaps even
more addictive - a kind of religious enlightenment or initiation
ecstasy which brings either true or illusory direct spiritual
experience. I want to emphasize that it is not significant
(from one point of view) to decide whether or not what is offered to
the princes of elite power and wealth is a true or false spiritual
achievement. We just have to appreciate how, for some, such
enticements will be quite powerful.
Here I want to take a small side trip, to make an as if
argument. Lets assume (for the moment) that the spiritual is
real, and that spiritual initiation is real. Lets also assume
that such spiritual Ways have both a left hand path and a right hand
path. In spiritual literature this is already well known, so I am
not so much speculating, as borrowing what already is discussed among
those who consider the spiritual real.
For example, Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925) taught what he
called Spiritual Science, and among his teachings one can find material
about what he called Occult Brotherhoods. He taught that behind
much that arose in England and American that led to WWI, and also was
certain to influence our time, there existed, from behind the scenes,
systems of spiritual enlightenment or initiation that already had long
traditions in the West. To make things simple (a bit dangerous,
but not too much so), I'll make some distinctions. There appear
to be many Occult Lodges of perhaps centuries hidden existence, and
rumors have been everywhere for years (the Illuminati, for example).
There are (to my mind) three main Ways: the Blacks, the
Whites and the Grays. The Blacks serve the Dark and get involved
in black magic and powers, and also get lost thereby in a kind of
spiritual cul de sac. The Whites serve the Good, and
believe personal individual free choice of all human beings is the
highest value, which is why (for example) Steiner gave 6000 lectures in
which he revealed all the secrets which had been kept for years by the
Grays, who coveted worldly power, and used their secret spiritual
knowledge to win a kind of dominance even more secret and powerful than
that of the super elites of wealth.
The view of the Gray Occult Lodges is that the world
order is fundamentally spiritual, and includes the belief that those,
who understand the spiritual rules behind existence, have an advantage, and a responsibility. Basically the Grays succumb to a characteristic
of Lucifer's Rebellion, and believe that ordinary human beings can't be
trusted to manage macro-human affairs. Only a privileged
elite can do so, and by this message, and a demonstration of unusual
psychic powers (clairvoyance of various kinds) the Lodges of Grays
seduce certain of the potential princes of England and America (as well
as some Europeans) into their spiritual ideology, which works from one
basic idea.
Someone, with the appropriate skills, must lead.
They are told: You have been selected to be part of this
unique community of world leaders, and you are engaged in a battle with
the East, which would bury the Christian West under its false views and
inhuman values. As a consequence, to participate in the
establishment of elaborate lies is necessary in order to make the world
safe for true Christian initiation and enlightenment, thus some special
few must make hard choices for
the
greater good.
Ordinary people can't be trusted, which is why we (the
Grays and the super elites) let them have their vain dreams and
dogmatic Christian religions. We, the spiritual elite, who serve
the Light Bringer (Lucifer, who in their spiritual ideology is painted
differently from typical Christian theology), know better. We
will take care of those who are less competent, and for the sacrifices
this requires of us, we need to live the good life, for we have to have
the same financial standing and power as the rulers of the decadent
Middle-East and Far East. With such great responsibility over the
true destiny of humanity, one has to have access to great financial and
political power, and there must also be equally great rewards.
Getting a sense of the necessary ideology? It
doesn't have to be exactly like this in its details. I am only
sketching (profiling) a general picture.
Excuse me for a moment while I retire from writing and
let my mind work free from its necessary swim in this degenerate
anti-Christian and immoral insanity.
just how
far are they willing to go
Some of the ideas that can be part of this religious-like
(but fundamentally irreligious) ideology concern the problems of death
and suffering. Among the kinds of knowledge, the Grays believe
they have access to, are ideas of reincarnation and the immortality of
the spirit. Other ideas include detailed matters concerning the
afterlife - that is what happens in between death and a new birth.
These views were seen historically as heretical (to institutional
Christian churches), and this justified as well the secrecy involved.
The Occult Lodges are old.
Since the human spirit is, from this point of view,
immortal, then death is seen (for this ideology) as simply a transition
to another state of existence for a time (until the next incarnation).
In addition, a version of the processes in the afterlife are also
taught in some of these circles, so that a bastardized view of divine
justice is presented. I suspect that what is taught suggests that
those who take this on the responsibility will receive their rewards in
heaven (as well as on earth) for such sacrifice (just like the Islamist
idea of virgins in heaven for suicide bombers, only far more
sophisticated).
Suffering and death are taught then to be a part of existence as ordained by the Gods, and the ruler-ship on the Earth of the Grays (the Occult Brotherhoods or Lodges - keep in mind this is still mostly male and patriarchal) is also part of the Divine Plan. Its a tough job, but someone has to do it. For pointing out the holes in such views, Steiner was eventually poisoned, after his main Temple to the Truth (the original Goetheanum in Switzerland) was burned to the ground.
In any event, many of these super elites belong to
various cults espousing allegedly superior religious views that paint
them as the morally just holders of worldly power. They have
little need to worry about the death and suffering of the masses, for
the immortal spirit will have a just afterlife and then be returned to
another earthly life. What matters is that the West dominate the East,
otherwise the true values of this superior and occult based
Christendom, will be lost. The world is the scene of a great
battle between the truly Godly and the Godless heathens.
In this battle any lie, and almost any act, is
justifiable, because it is clearly needed to win (for the greater good). The world must be Christianized, but not
in the outer religious sense so many fundamentalists and Zionists and
Islamists believe, but from a secret brotherhood that has come into
incarnation just to deal with these battles.
Two such battles occurred in the first half of the 20th
Century: World War One and World War Two. A very
significant theater of these battles in the earthly realm was Central
Europe, especially Germany. Like the United States is being
painted today (by these same powers) as the author of horrible deeds in
the world, so Central European culture, with its remarkable spiritual
potentials (it gave us after all, in the 19th Century, the complete
basis for modern natural science), had to carry its own Cross - to
become viewed, not as a source of truth and initiation in the
mysteries, but as decadent and uncaring, as well as capable of any
unspeakable crime (the holocaust). For similar reasons it
was important to these powers that America openly take up torture (and
other grossly immoral acts), for there is coming a third great war,
again to be fought mostly in the Center, between East and West.
America too is to now carry a Cross.
The world is a giant game of Risk (a military board
game), and if you are a Nixon or a Kissinger or a Clinton or a
Rockefeller or a - pick any family name from the elites, you must use
the productive might of America to make a powerful war machine, provide
fodder for armies from the poor, and rule (for a time) from the
Executive Branch, as the world goes through a well understood and
predictable (by all those well-paid and seduced fine minds) transition
in the West from Nation States to feudal-like independent Corporate
Trade Empires.
The world will go through a time of great chaos, flirt
with a new ice age (global warming is just a prelude), and many will
die (be recycled through reincarnation), while the Corporation as an
Entity (read the first six novels of William Gibson, who gave us the
term cyberspace) free of human control (but needing to be well taken
care of by human servant management) becomes the dominate social form
all over the world (the free and wanton capitalism of the West is to
consume the East, both from the outside and the inside - China and
India, for example, in their headlong rush into free market capitalism
don't really yet recognize their peril). A hierarchical social
form (all structure and no heart) is to be set free, and there combined
with the numeric powers of more and more advanced computers.
The fear of the Grays has some reality behind it.
For if the East were to triumph, the Christianized West would
likewise be consumed (a process already begun due to the many in
America who have taken undisciplined* ideas of Buddhism into their
naturally Christianized souls (see my book: the
Natural Christian). An imagination of
this possibility (control of the world by decadent culture from the
East) is contained in the eight remarkable novels of the Chung Kuo Series, written by David Wingrove.
*[Just being spiritual may satisfy a curious soul, but we
also have to be awake to the long term cultural implications of
differences between Occidental and Oriental philosophies. There
are profound reasons why there is a cultural East and West.]
As these developments unfold, however, many in the West
will wake up (also predictable), so it was necessary to bring into play
a complete degeneration of civil rights, particularly in America, in
order to control and imprison any and all dissent against the terrible
social processes that must be allowed to freely occur (in the world
view of the Grays). Long in planning, certain final callous and
indifferent moves were made during the Bush II administration, with
Karl Rove as the master overseer (the one with the most callous mind of
all - a genius unique in world history, known to be coming into
incarnation by the Brotherhoods, and thus helped at every turn to
eventually sit inside the web of political power in the United States).
Now he has moved into the Media, where with the help of Rupert
Murdoch he works both for Fox News and the Wall Street Journal,
enabling him to provide for the laity of the elites of wealth all the
self-centered moral justification needed during this transition through
social chaos to the new world order of free Corporate Entities and
number driven computer social controls (just think today about all the
software that exists allowing management to intrude right into the work
stations of the modern office worker).
Of course, the scientific materialism of the West, helps
foster great disbelief in such an understanding. What better way
to keep secret a ruler-ship of the world, than mask it with a world
view (scientific materialism) that casts doubt on all possible
religious understanding. The work of the Lodges has been well
thought out over centuries of time. Keep in mind, however, that
they are not unopposed (e.g. Rudolf Steiner - and of course many
others, including this author).
As just pointed out, there is another difficulty in this.
Some in the East are not asleep either. There
are those in the East who seek the same victory, but they lag
behind the stream of events, and also are always catching up to
technological advances. Their advantage is untapped natural
resources, a willingness to pollute to the max, and huge expendable
populations (both India and China, as well as Russia to a certain
extent). They are also more obviously callous in opposing dissent.
From this picture it can seem as if those of us below the elites in the social commons are to be toast (everyone is aware that in the present the middle class in America is disappearing). Well there would be little point to this essay if this was truly the case, so now let us move from these too too dark thoughts and find some light and warmth.
One more point, however. In reading the above we can't just skip over the process by which the spiritual gifts of Central Europe were intentionally scourged and had set upon its genius a crown of thorns. Now this genius (a part of the natural genius of the whole world - see Teilhard de-Cardin's idea of the noosphere) must be resurrected. While a similar scourging and crowning with thorns is being applied today with regard to the genius of the American Spirit, that genius would do well to recognize that in going through its own cross bearing, crucifixion, death and resurrection, that it will serve the Good in the best way, by helping restore the cultural health of the Center and the East as well. The world is a whole, and we serve ourselves best, when we serve the whole (wash the feet).
Let us repeat what Maureen Dowd wrote above:
First paragraphs from a column by Maureen Dowd in the Nov. 11th 2009 New York Times:
The Great
Vampire Squid has gotten religion.
In an
interview with The Sunday Times of London, the cocky chief of Goldman
Sachs said he understands that a lot of people are “mad and bent out of
shape” at blood-sucking banks.
“I know I
could slit my wrists and people would cheer,” Lloyd Blankfein, the
C.E.O., told the reporter John Arlidge.
But the
little people who are boiling simply don’t understand. And Rolling
Stone’s Matt Taibbi, who unforgettably labeled Goldman “a great vampire
squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its
blood funnel into anything that smells like money,” doesn’t understand.
Banks,
Blankfein explained, are really serving the greater good.
“We help
companies to grow by helping them to raise capital,” he said.
“Companies that grow create wealth. This, in turn, allows people to
have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. It’s a virtuous
cycle. We have a social purpose.”
When Arlidge asked whether it’s possible to make too much money, whether Goldman will ignore the people howling at the moon with rage and go on raking it in, getting richer than God, Blankfein grinned impishly and said he was “doing God’s work.”
Civil
Society, the Wise-Earth, Blessed Unrest* and the Mystery of America
*special thanks to Paul
Hawken for this insight
Probably the primary thing to first realize is that those
who build a wall to keep others out, also build a prison for
themselves. The Berlin Wall kept communists in as much as
it kept the West out. The Wall in Israel dividing Israelis
from Palestinians does the same. It appears in place as an effort
to contain and control something, and at the same time is a trap for
those who impose it. The elites of wealth (and their priests in the
Occult Lodges) suffer the same error of focus. The more they try
to control and dominate the more they are trapped in the narrowness of
vision of that methodology. Each seeming effort at controlling by
the application of top down hierarchical social power ties the manager
to more and more limited opportunities and consequences. The box
they seek to use to contain us, just as much contains them, albeit in a
different way.
Our main strategy is then to think outside the box. I know, it is an awful pun in a way, but a truth
as well.
There is another strategy that helps. The martial
art known as Aikido: "the way of unifying (with) life energy" or "the
way of harmonious spirit" gives a hint. When an aggressor comes
toward you, you move in such a way that the energy of the aggressor
moves through and around you as if you weren't there.
To give another really strange hint here - consider the
possibility of not moving toward dissent at all. A system
expecting rebellion in masses of dissatisfied people through protest,
doesn't know what to do if you do something else, something entirely
off the wall so to speak. Suppose all that was needed was to
elaborate the truth of the subterfuge placed in the world by the super
elites and their priests (expose it) and then declare victory.
Another off the wall strange idea: the movie War Games
(if you don't know it, rent it). A computer hacker discovers a
war games computer run by the military is about to launch a nuclear
war. He makes the computer play tic tac toe over and over
again, so as to learn this lesson: the only way to win is not to play
the game at all.
By creating a game (gaming the world) the super elites
are bound up in that game (the box that confines them). By
understanding their defect (their lame thinking), we don't play that
game, but create another. Instead of either/or, we do what
happens in a both/and solution - something not on the table yet,
emerges. They make war on us, we make peace on them.
This won't be easy. Consider the impulse to
activism so common today, such as Green politics, environmental
protest, PETA, move-on.org and so forth. In a lot of this
activity life energy is spent trying to fix the system - trying to
induce changes in a macro social structure which isn't actually capable
of change. It is too old and too rigid, and as we expend our life
energy trying to change it, we avoid doing as much as possible to
change ourselves. By the way, don't think they don't promote
this. Remember all those smart minds they can buy?
You can bet they have people (who don't even know the
elites support them) just to lead this activist dissent activity, which
misdirects us from what we can actually do (keeps us busy in the game,
when not being in the game at all is what we need to do instead).
Blessed Unrest (see Paul Hawken's book of the same name) is a first stage of perception by the ordinary people of the world, living in the social below - the social commons - of their shared trials. We are waking up to each other, as much as we are waking up to the gamesmanship of the super elites of wealth, and their priests in the Occult Brotherhoods.
Think of the school yard. One pushes the other, the
other pushes back. Each push energizes the other, until war
breaks
out. All the time we spend trying to force the high elites
(and their political surrogates) to change, only has the effect of
giving them strength to resist. The '60's and '70's in
America actually invigorated and entrenched conservative thinking as a
push back in reaction to the push from the left. Today, they once
more are expecting our resistance. If we don't resist (if
we aren't there in a kind of way) they will overbalance and fall.
They shove, we move gracefully aside, keeping our center through
our Wise Earth communities, and then overbalanced by their aggression,
they fall.
It will be hard to understand, but there is a wise
governance to the world that is itself superior to anything the super
elites and their priests can imagine. Some of them know they are
living in this wise world, but still want earthly power and perhaps
even believe they can game the perceivable and true spiritual order of
human existence. Their problem is that this wisdom is a
distributed system (check this out with regard to computers if you want
to understand it in a coarse way). The way the wise guidance of
the world works, as a distributed system, is that the main factors in
its unfolding are ordinary human beings.
While the Grays worship Lucifer, the Light Bringer, the
White Brotherhoods trust individual human freedom and marvel at what
ordinary human beings do and accomplish, because in them lives the
Christ Impulse (like the Buddha Nature described in the cultural East,
there is a Christ Impulse - a non-institutional spiritual instinct for
moral self sacrifice and wisdom in most all human beings) (again see my
book: the Natural Christian*).
Don't we hear many people say today: I'm not religious, but I am
spiritual. The ego or I of ordinary
human beings is collectively (in communities) a kind of genius far
superior to whatever the elites seek and produce, because the real
authority in the world is moral. The meek shall inherit the Earth.
*[See also Ben-Aharon's America's
Global Responsibility: individuation, initiation and threefolding. As well as Steiner's: The
Threefold Social Organism.]
This is what lives, and has so far manifested, in Civil
Society etc. Moral human action. In the wise guidance of
humanity and the world, the elites actually suffer the consequences of
their personal out of balance appetites for power and wealth, only to
end up by this activity serving the distributed moral intelligence of
the world (the noosphere) by creating just enough chaos to goad it into waking
action. We can legitimately declare victory because in waking up
to the truth of our situation we have already won (the creators of the
movie The Dark Knight instinctively
understood this). Yes, there are agents of chaos, but the effect
of that is to prompt into action something wonderful (yet dreaming) in
the soul and spirit of individuals.
The rest is details, and as these are important, I will
next begin relating those thoughts which I can offer as my contribution
to our shared distributed wisdom - Blessed Unrest and the Wise-Earth.
counter-moves
-
some examples
Great wisdom is obvious in: think globally, act locally. Because the real wisdom, that is superior to the
lost-in-illusion super elites, is a distributed system based upon
individual moral action, the work is always where we are. Right
in front of us in our biographies. This is one of the
reasons we can let go a lot of vain activity which seeks to coerce a
system that if left to its own inner nature will collapse in on
itself.
A characteristic of this old system is that it is
hierarchical (top down) and mostly male dominated (patriarchal).
The emerging new system is circle like (based on sharing) and
returns once more the previously set aside matriarchal understandings
(think the social ways of the Iroquois Federation). An old social
order is dying, whose inner dynamic is based on dominion over, to be replaced by a new social order whose inner
dynamic is communion
with.*
*[See my book: the Way of
the Fool. for more details]
Of course, not everyone is going to understand the
psychological Aikido of not playing the game by declaring victory.
Once the mob had been romanticized in the Godfather movies and
the Sopranos, and corrupt cops in The Shield, no one should be
surprised that Sons of Anarchy will soon romanticize biker gangs.
The world takes all kinds, and we each have choices that will
lead to consequences.
For those willing to take on the tasks required, to be a
wise earth spirit, unresisting (in only certain ways) in relationship
to the overreaching of super elite aggression, there are certain basic
tools, all of which are related to compassion (our individual Buddha
Nature) and love (our individual Christ Impulse). For the
simple reason that I like the "l" sound at the beginning of the word love,
I'll
label these three tools: language; law,
and
liquidity.
Of these, the most powerful is language, so lets begin
there:
the coming transformation to a new oral culture,
through the reinvigorating of our appreciation of
the hidden
possibilities in Language and conversation
This next process I seek to illuminate has already began,
and while often thought of as a flaw by many elites of culture, the
move away from the cannons of Western literature, in the West (and
perhaps elsewhere) is a hint of things to come. As one of
the places language is artistically displayed in is song, lets observe
a cultural process that took place since the middle of the 20th
Century, so as to see what this process can teach us of the coming
future. This is just one example of many that could be put
forward.
In 1955 or thereabouts, Elvis, the King of Rock and Roll
comes along. He's not the cause of, or even really the leader of,
but sometimes cultural changes have a fore-runner, someone who stands
out as the wave of social change begins its more visible movements.
Anyway, Negro (today we say Black, but then we used other terms)
blues music (which has a distinctly sexual aspect) gets united with
Anglo (white) culture's pop love songs, and Rock and Roll charges into
the world. Being as English and American culture are deeply
related, it isn't too long before the Beatles and others join in, and
something comes out into the whole world that was never there before.
The world responds, in a lot of different ways.
Reggae music (Bob Marley etc.) sings back, and something that the
awake DJ's start to call World Beat comes back toward America (Paul
Simon catches some of it in his intriguingly named Graceland album).
Rock and Roll and World Beat have a kind of cultural intercourse,
as the wise hearts of musicians and songwriters all over the world get
involved in talking to each other through song and music (a lot of this
never appears on commercial radio and TV in America, but it
nevertheless took place). Not to soon thereafter, out of the
depths of certain northern city black ghettos, and in part in response
to World Beat, Hip Hop is born (some of this later morphs into Rap).
Now Hip Hop is three things. First it pares down the
musical element to almost just rhythm - just the beat. It also is
poetry, but poetry as a story. Oral stories you can dance to.
Basic. Fundamental. It is also, in its pure form, out
of the social commons (a kind of instinctive communion with) and when it remains there it is free of the corruption
of commercial interests.
Everyone now should be able to look at world-wide
cultural developments among ordinary people and see there the wise
earth transformations.
Schools have failed to keep up with the changes in the
lives and nature of the human beings attending them. The
education system, having run out of ideas (old dying culture), can't
really speak anymore to the real life in the big cities (much less
elsewhere, for example, the story telling in Country Music speaks
volumes about the ordinary life of a lot of people). Time
(in the sense of change) is speeding up and the history of popular
culture from the '50's on tells this story in a big way (except in
commercial radio - fake imitative culture, which driven by the profit
motive and greed, doesn't get the true spirit of these changes at all).
But true new culture, such as Hip Hop, even thought it fits
within what those who can't get over worshiping the past decry as the
loss of interest in the written word - Hip Hop is genuinely new.
Just to give an example that this change is a bit
noticed, a poet laureate of England, when asked in an interview whether
there were any voices out that that he thought special, said that
people should pay careful attention to Eminem (Marshall Mathers), who
he considered to be the new Bob Dylan (the poet-seer deeply in touch
with his time). There is no Eminem (a shooting star whose
time quickly passed) without the Eight Mile section of Detroit and Hip
Hop. That white culture still borrows from Black culture could be
seen as a problem (and is by some), but is better appreciated for the
fact that it represents a profound spiritual-cultural intercourse that
is world-wide in scope.
The thing is that oral culture is more alive. The
word dies when it is rendered into print on a page. It needs the
reader to resurrect it. But oral culture, in a social
situation, jumps from one to the other, like a kind of electric arc.
It enlivens. If we were to wander the hidden cultural
byways of the world (and in America) we'd see that down in the social
below, the social commons, story tellers are becoming important again.
In the colleges and the universities - the ivory tower -
there is too much intellect and not enough heart (the organization is dominion over). Especially when times get tough as they are
doing now in a big way. Now I am not saying no more written
literature at all. Just that like anything there is excess,
and one of the nice things that happened to the world (as on odd kind
of after effect) was when China began their take over of Tibet in 1949
and began shoving all
those Lamas (teachers of deep Buddhist ways) out into the world.
Tibet, as a cultural source, had been a kind of slowly cooking
wisdom soup pot, and now the genius of history kicked that pot over and
sent its nourishment rushing all over the world.
In a similar kind of way, by wrecking (for a time through
WWII) the
cultural life of the Center (Central Europe), this forced certain
cultural forces
(including communities of spiritual beings for those willing to look at
it that way) toward the East and the West, looking for incarnated
individuals receptive to their wisdom. This in a way has brought
about the beginning of the fulfillment of an ancient American Indian
Prophecy (the Hopi Prophecy). This too will take an oral
form, just as the Buddhist wisdom cooked slowly in Tibet is best
rendered orally.
In Europe, the Anthroposophy of Rudolf Steiner mostly
rested in lectures and in books, imitating the European ideal of the
university (their center, in Switzerland in the Goetheanum, has
something that is called: the School of Spiritual Science). This modern
Christian-like wisdom (heretical to the max when compared to the fake
Christianity of most organized Christian religions) is itself waking up
to its conversational or oral capacities in a new way.
I mention all this, the Hip Hop street poetry, the
Buddhist soup pot from Tibet and the heretical Christian wisdom of
Anthroposophy, to show that this change to oral culture is everywhere.
It takes a lot of different forms - just think about a
Twelve
Step meeting. It consists, when best, of the oral representation
of personal stories and mutual confession. These are deeply
powerful forces for change. Books will still be important, but
what is said from one person to another person will again outweigh all
that. In fact, the core of this little book is a story.
The
profile is a story. No one is required
to believe it, nor will they be tested on this material like in a
school, nor will they be part of a community that will shun them if
they don't mouth the right dogmas.
Language* then is born, in its most vital way, in
conversation and in story telling. In ages long ago, in a galaxy far far away, ancient story tellers were everywhere (that's what
George Lucas is, a story teller using the medium of modern film - also
M. Night Shyamalan - remember modern wisdom is distributed).
The Gospels were stories. The fables of the Greeks were
stories. Buddhism was originally oral. However, and
this is a very important however, the inspiring genius behind these
stories, which at one time tended to concentrate into a few (Virgil,
Homer, etc.), is now diffuse and distributed.
*[See the poem The Gift of the Word in the appendix.]
Steiner, for example, in creating the Anthroposophical
Society, created what he called Branches and Groups, and even pointed
out that in the future this is where the real work was to be done.
The social commons, while collectively owned (as it were), is
really just who is there at any given moment sharing in the
conversation. The wisdom source lives in us all now, in our
individual thinking. The Wise Earth - Civil Society - filled with
Blessed Unrest.
While we have it (it can fail or become taken over) the
Internet gives us wide ranging abilities to tell our stories.
Millions of blogs. FaceBook pages.
Everyone has something to say. The coming
resurrection of new oral culture will be entirely unlike what oral
culture was in the ancient world.
Here we will be challenged to craft, with each other,
what the world means. Will we tell a story of bad people in corporate
office buildings who all must die and be blown up in order to save the
rest, or will we tell the story of all the places in the world, whether
they are a skyscraper in New York City, or a brothel in Thailand, such
that we learn to see that all are temples to that which in that place
is worshiped by those who are confused and lost and don't yet recognize
their brothers and sisters?
Will we speak of the confusion between the impulse toward
dominion over, and the impulse for communion with, or will we teach the children that those who are other,
must be hated? Will we be top down and hierarchical, or
circle-like and sharing?
Will we spread harmful gossip, or will we illuminate each
other with grace? This is the fundamental question of the
application of language - of the gift of the word - as a vehicle for
new oral culture.
redesigning the organizational structure of societies
through
our understanding of the real living nature of the Law
The law, that most of us know today (at least in
America), has its roots in the time of the Roman Empire. Many of
its ideas are still couched in Latin (for example, res ipsa loquitur: the thing speaks for itself; or habeas corpus: show or bring the body). Like anything else, a
legal system can grow old, and as I have suggested elsewhere in my
writings - that we live in a time of the End of Western Civilization,
then no one should doubt for a moment that the law (as conceived
centuries ago) has become socially exhausted and spent.
It is unwieldy and excessively detailed. Its
last towering ideal impulse was during the time of the Warren Court,
when so many of our civil rights, originally recognized by the
Constitution, became truly universal (it only took almost two hundred
years?!?). The coming descent into social chaos may produce
pockets
(some quite large) of anarchy. We need only look to Africa and
parts of Asia to see how large such pockets of anarchy can be.
Petty dictators seize governments and old tribal allegiances are
borrowed by thugs as justification for murder and theft. In
America, we have a quite odd, yet remarkable tradition, the gun rule of
the old West. Cowboy justice, sometimes good, and often just
another
kind of mob rule, is likely to return - its true mission unfinished.
The Corporations have no real interest in justice, for
they want to be a law unto themselves. At the same time, they
don't have an interest in controlling everything either. William
Gibson, in his future oriented novel Virtual
Light, had this to say through his characters:
"You know," Sammy Sal said, pausing before a first shallow sip, " you shouldn't have this kind of a problem. You don't need to. There's only but two kinds of people. People who can afford hotels like that, they're one kind. We're the other. Used to be, like, a middle class, people in between. But not anymore. How you and I relate to those other people, we proj their messages on. We get paid for it. We try not to drip rain on the carpet. And we get by, okay? But what happens on the interface? What happens when we touch?"
Chevette burned her mouth on espresso.
"Crime," Sammy Sal said,
"sex. Maybe drugs. He put his cup down on the wagon's plywood
counter. "About covers it."
Where Corporate control wants it, there will be one kind
of law. Theirs. Where they have no interest, in the
communities that are truly separate, there will be another kind of law.
Ours. In the middle, in the vague in between where
the two kinds of order touch - something neither. By theirs, by the way, I don't mean other people, but what is
required by a social form that has freed itself from human control.
Lets look a little more closely at this.
Many readers will know that the lawnow (in its decadence)
considers
corporations to be persons. There is a rather insane
history in this, but the practice is too embedded in legal culture now.
Legal rules also require of management that they serve the
stockholders over almost every other value (workers needs,
environmental needs etc.). The doctrine in its widest form is
called due
diligence. So, the Corporation is
a person, and its managers must serve, with due diligence, the
interests of the owners (the stock holders) over every other value.
Many corporations own their own stock. Can you
see where this is going? The legal structure of a Corporation is emancipating itself from human
control. Its technical ownership is diffuse. Neither stock holders or the managementreally run
the
Corporation anymore, which has a great momentum as a social form.
A kind
of idea incarnates in the Corporation, which as we know is kind of
callous and indifferent to most others affected by that social form
(uses the workers, lies to the consumers of its products, corrupts
political processes, grossly enriches management and a few stock
holders, etc.). As Western Civilization dies, a decadent social
form will live on for a time, a kind of ghost of some of the worst
moral impulses of that Civilization. The individuals living out
these selfish and callously indifferent impulses will die, but the Social/Legal Creature created by this activity will continue.
Keep in mind that corporations have a culture - a Way.
Some are overt, some more secret. These views in the future
will become more and more religious-like (even cultish). Human
energy will design them. The textural structure of the rule of
the Occult Lodges will seek to seep into these cultures.
The separation between this creature of corporate control and communities of free individuals
doesn't have to be physical, either. Its not a question of place,
but who you are with and what are the circumstances. Nor will all
corporate control, or all free communities, have the same laws and
social rules. A Corporate Entity that wants a longer future
will take better care of its human servants. A free community
that wants a longer future will take greater care in creating its
serving and hopefully living laws.
In a certain sense, the realm of law,
or
of expressed (perhaps written, perhaps oral) social order, is a
middle realm between language and culture, and
economics and money (liquidity). It partakes
of both (see Steiner's ideas on the
Threefold Social Order here).
Laws after all are formed of words and ideas, while money
and liquidity concerns things (objects), and the relationships of
people to such objects. In an economy, objects, even money, must
be in movement (liquidity). In a culture, ideas must be free and
living (again in movement). They can't come to rest in fixed
words (dogmas). In the middle realm, there needs to be that which
is moving, that still somehow has the character of an object.
This is what a law is, in a living way, freed of the old
barnacles of dead Roman thought. In the arguments of the Supreme
Court we hear echos of these conceptions of the law in the ideas of living meaning, versus original meaning. Some
want to fix the meaning in the 200 plus years old thought of the
Founders (as can best be understood), while others want to free the
meaning of laws to adapt to the reality of the human present.
This is why my book Uncommon
Sense suggests we write a new Declaration of
Independence and a new Constitution. If we don't modernize the
law during the death of Western Civilization (the transition from
Nation States to feudal-like Corporate Entities, swimming in a vast
disorganized sea of free functioning anarchies), the law will continue
to crack and fracture until it falls down around our heads.
If, in fact, we want to participate in the process by
which the Corporate Entity arises to a kind of independence (and it
must for a time so arise - it can be a necessary and stabilizing
historical force after a period of chaos), we have to participate in
the law creation process as it is. It is really very useless to
protest that laws favor the rich, or stand with signs outside places
where the elites and super elites gather. Instead, those who
would influence politics have to run for office, and get their hands
dirty in all that troublesome mess, from local politics on up.
Can't be an idealist there. Have to compromise.
Oh, a protester can be an idealist, but not someone in real
politics.
At the same time, we can do politics better than those
who do it now do it. Again - distributed wisdom. Think globally,
act locally. As long as people have avoided the legislative
halls, whether they are just a school board, or a city council or a
state assembly, much less the Senate or the Congress, this has left the
field of battle, over the meaning and processes of social order,
abandoned to the super elites, or the smaller and sometimes more
insideous religious fundamentalists, and they haven't been asleep at
all. There is sweat capital that is the equal of money capital.
Human energy. Life energy. Political Aikido as
dance. This kind of local polticial activity needs to be the
locus of bottom up political capital. Not the political capital
of the elites, or the surrogates the political parties, but the common
sense participation out of the social commons - the circle-like communion with.
If we really use the Wise Earth distributed wisdom born
in Blessed Unrest politically, we can do a lot. After all,
politics is about story telling. Sure it has a lot of lies, but
there are lots of ways to tell a true story. If Hip Hop and
Country Music married each other, for example, in the production of
political songs for individual candidates, distributed door to door by
activists (bored with protesting), who know what might happen? A
protest sign is one thing, street entertainment another. One is
negative and against, the other is creative and for.
Think Jon Stewart. It is possible to do parody that
doesn't demean, but merely punctures what is over-inflated.
Variations are endless, and the amount of distributed creativity
out there is already enormous. Sweat political capital can equal
money
political capital in the present and coming political battles. People
just have
to get off their couches and from in front of their TVs, stop shopping
and go
participate.
The best way to learn about the law is to try to make new
ones. My Uncommon
Sense has a lot of ideas along this line.
As the degree of social chaos increases (its actual depths
can't be predicted, just its general shape), where anarchy is local
(government ineffective), then so must law creation become local.
Think Katrina and the Super Dome - only lasting for months,
perhaps years, instead of days and weeks. In such circumstances
we can't stand around waiting for help from a government that has
proved itself actually incapable. We have to organize our
selves. We have to work with each other instead of waiting for
the big father in Washington to do the right thing. Native
Americans can well tell the story of that illusory promise.
Sharing
the Earth: things, money, Liquidity and work.
There is a lot of good work out there already on the nature of debt-money. We all need to understand it. Just don't get one-sided. Remember the wisdom is distributed, so use a lot of different resources. Steiner wrote a book: World Economy. There is the Small is Beautiful Schumacher Society. There's the book Muddling Toward Frugality, by Warren Johnson. People are creating community farms. Co-ops are in a lot of places. Credit Unions are better than banks. There's the alternate currency movement. Local barter centers in church parking lots.
The best debt-money material is by Richard Kotlarz, whose columns on A
New View of Money can be found on the Internet here:
http://www.concordresolution.org/column.htm Nobody has the
handle on it he has. A couple of points that he makes are worth
mentioning right here.
If we understood how money actually operates (in its true, but hidden,
sense), we would know that when the bank loans money it creates
it. What actually happens is
that when we write the check on that available credit (and also with a
lot of other
banking-related transactions) the money doesn't come into existence
until that moment in time. The loan based check allows the bank
to create
the money and charge the macro economic structure interest (thus, debt
money). The way this system works is that the amount of debt
constantly increases, because it is never fully retired due to the
interest payment hidden in the the bowels of the money transaction
process. We've reached a point today where the weight of this
debt money interest is so huge, the world economy is falling
apart. The sub-prime mortgage crisis was just one of many places
in the world economy where it began to fracture due to this mamouth
excess of unpaid interest-debt.
The way out is for governments (and that is ultimately us) to issue the
money, not the backs. Read Richard for the details.
Knowledge of this is crucial to navigating the future. Government
issued money carries no debt and the consequences for our economic life
are considerable.
In the War the rich are making upon the poor there are
two kinds of approaches we can make from the social commons in terms of
dealing with the problem of liquidity of money and other objects that
we need. Some are strategic and some are tactical. Moving
away from bank issued money to government issued money (remember we are
the government) is a fundamental strategic approach. It is large
scale. Other kinds of activities that need to accompany the
coming changes are tactical - that is local, something like an IED
(those roadside bombs in Iraq). But these are social weapons, not
physical weapons.
For example, the super elites think on the macro scale.
They are tied to old ideas of hierarchical organization and
top down management styles. Remember they took over from
the aristocracies of blood, and just made themselves secret Kings and
Queens. But as our distributed wisdom tells us: all politics is
local. Try as the elites might (even with computers)
there's a limit to the detail they'll be able to micro-manage.
Their influence dissipates - it spreads out and becomes
less concentrated (and thus less effective as it moves away from
its top of the pyramid. The computer gives it a tool to try to
micro-manage, but all computers can be hacked. The hacking
intelligence of humanity is also distributed. What happens to the
software inside a corporation that tries to micro-manage all its office
workers if a hacker gets in there, but not in a big obvious way?
Instead, a wise way. Back doors, little code tricks like in
computer games that let the office worker trick the system from his
end. Hide the code tricks in mnemonic stories, just as certain
secrets were once embedded in nursery rhymes.
We don't confront these corporate wrongs directly.
We out think them.
For sure, one possibility (and a hard one at that) is that a lot of what ecology minded folks want may just come about through broad social collapse. In worse case world-wide environmental chaos scenario, the industrial world dies. In that case there isn't enough social order at the top to keep the big hierarchically managed systems running. No electricity, no running water. No trucks running all over America moving food. No big farms to make all that overabundance of nutritionless food. Lots of isolation and lots of anarchy.
What we need is skills. As such a collapse
looms (to whatever degree it actually manifests - think the
precautionary principle), we need the distributed wisdom to appreciate
the need to preserve knowledge and pass on skills. Here's one
idea. Its strategic in conception and creation, but tactical in
local application.
Think open source. Open source computer people
created on-line free software (such as Linux) that was better than what
was being created by the corporations. Windows sucks - its
too open to being hacked. Linux isn't, but is only slowly making
its way in the world, replacing an operating system that is crap.
You know why Windows sucks? Because they never delete
any of the old code. Its this huge fat pile of mostly old code
that only works because processing speeds have increased enough to run
through all the old code on the way to finding the new stuff (unless it
balks somewhere in all that junk computer software dna, in which case
you get the famous Blue Screen of Death - a Windows crash).
Open Source communities need to create a Library for the Future. If the collapse gets too out of control (something the super elites are willing to risk, because with all their power and private armies they will survive), the knowledge generated by Western Civilization could be lost (along with all the other cultural treasures of East, Center and West).
If you are in an isolated community, experiencing a long
period of anarchy, do you know how to recognize and treat dysentery,
cholera etc.? Can you, if you have a water source, build a water
wheel? If you have piles of old electronics, can you recycle them
into something you need and can use? Do you know how to make
insulin from sheep? What about sewing up a bad wound?
If you check out survivalist websites on the Internet,
there is a lot of information. There could be a lot more.
A DVD of the right storage capacity can store something
like 20,000 books. The Media Lab at MIT has created a tough cheap
laptop that runs on a crank (you just turn the crank and make the
electricity). Such a laptop and such a DVD (with some appropriate
yet unwritten search software) takes the knowledge and skills our
society has concentrated in single individuals, and passes it on to the
whole. Distribute several million of these worldwide, in
all kinds of languages (remember the Internet is this huge huge
structure for sharing information, and if it gets its collective mind
around a task, tens of thousands of people will do the grunt work for
free).
One of the things you'll get is a variety of DVDs.
Or, a website (or a hundred websites) where you can create the
DVD you want, selecting what knowledge you want, for your personally
designed Library. You don't have to use the crank laptop, but can
keep the one you have, if you just find on the Internet where to get
what you need from Radio Shack and the like, to turn your bicycle into
a machine that will generate the right tickle of electricity when you
pedal it.
Once, in America, there was the Whole Earth Catalog.
Guess what the Internet is? It just needs some folks to
fill in the gaps in the organizing of information, and showing how to
distribute it to the local places that need it. Think globally,
act locally.
The same whole earth distributed wisdom resource can
design new products for those people who want to plan ahead.
Could an alternate barter currency system come awake on the
Internet? In a functioning anarchy, what is the "government" the
issues the currency?
Keep in mind that the super elites are no doubt planning
to either crash the system (the Internet) or over control it, if it
starts getting too
rambunctious. There will be a window of opportunity and then it
will close. At the same time, if a lot of people are
acting, then a process we can call synergy happens. We don't have to ourselves over-organize
the same way an old tired hierarchical social form does.
The social commons we all share, with its distributed
wisdom systems, will naturally form synergistic structures.
These will arise, and then pass away. People
will form associations that live for a time, and then dissolve.
Remember, the nature of the Sharing of the Earth can be
captured in the idea of liquidity. Life Energy in
movement. Money, ideas, goods, services, whatever. We just
be careful not to let it come to fixed conditions of rest. The
old pyramidal social form (dominion over) the Corporations
seek to preserve won't continue very long, for it contains a constant
urge to become more and more rigid, which eventually must lead to its
death.
The circle form of new communities (communion with) is fluid enough to adapt, either within the Corporate
structure, or outside it. The Wise Earth is alive, and life
(as was said in the movie Jurassic
Park by the Jeff Goldblum character) will find a way.
One of Rudolf Steiner's ideas about money (in World Economy) is that it comes into being in relationship to the original transaction (such as selling produce), and then exists for a time, and then dies. Money is like the spiritual blood stream of the economy, and just like the blood its substance lives for time and then dies to be replaced by new substance.
Another of his ideas is that labor should not be treated
as a commodity, nor should land. Under a real appreciation of the
nature of economic processes, to treat either as a commodity causes all
kind of indirect social ruin. For example, capital dies
when it becomes invested in land. In that place it can't continue
to circulate. Land is a kind of choke-point. We saw
this in the recent housing bubble collapse. All kinds of value
got locked in land, and the whole system kind of choked on it.
People's work (their labor) can't be a commodity either.
Labor is best viewed as a gift from one to another. We
don't work for ourselves, we work for each other. The social
organism under the ideas of Threefolding is meant to be seen as living
(liquidity). Think of what we call the division of labor.
In more ancient times if you had land, you could (in some
circumstances) wrest your living from it. Normally you
didn't do this alone, but together with others. Paying for labor
is not universal, in a cultural sense. Native Americans, true
Cajuns etc., had a strong ethos of sharing. Buying and selling
labor is a by-product of economic confusion, rooted in a tradition of
slavery, serfdom and peasantry. Don't we call ourselves: wage slaves?
Recall our idea of distributed wisdom. It is the
nature of the division of labor that it is distributed as well. You fix a car. The dentist fixes
your teeth. Your neighbor fixes your dentist's toilet. We
are interdependent. We already work for each other all the time,
we just don't notice it. If you treat the single parts of that
process (the labor) as a thing, as a commodity that can be bought and
sold, we mistake what needs to be honored essentially as a spiritual
gift from one human being to another (our labor) the same way we treat
a shirt.
If you are getting the idea that this is all a bit
strange and complicated, good. Remember, we've been living in a
fake religion of economic ideas, all designed to benefit one class -
the class of aristocrats of wealth that succeeded the class of blood
aristocrats before them.
Another of Steiner's unique ideas is that capital (which
can function in a true economy) would be managed from what he called
the cultural sphere (that area above were we talked about language).
People not necessarily involved directly in banks and financial
institutions would evaluate the proposals of entrepreneurs seeking
capital. Their question would be how would the product serve the
whole, not which small group is going to make the most profit making
something people don't really need, by abusing workers and ruining the
environment.
I can't here teach you everything about the Threefold
Social Organism, or Richard Kotlarz's New View of Money, but with the
ideas of language (cultural activity) and law
(political-legal activity) and liquidity (economic activity)
you've began to become acquainted with something much wiser than the
fake religion of free markets and unrestrained capitalism.
* * *
Lets return now to the beginning, in a way, to recall and
complete the spiral movement of thought unveiled in this essay ...
We started with a quest. How do we understand the
world we live in? What are the real dynamic forces working in
human social life? So much seems insane and crazy - is it
possible it is not just accidental, but something various people do on
purpose?
I proposed thinking about social and political life in the same way a profiler does. Look at it from the same point of view of the people who don't care. What might be that point of view? How might they think? Does history and our common knowledge of events and political realities justify our having truthful knowledge that such point of view exists?
For some readers, what was then discovered may have
seemed to have gotten pretty out there. Talk about a conspiracy
theory! All the same, we didn't stop there. We looked
at our own situation, at the reality of ordinary people in the social
below - the social commons. Are we helpless victims, or something
else?
I believe I showed how this was not the case - we were
not victims and not helpless. We were in fact a step or two
away from appreciating our real powers, powers (sweat capital or
equity) equal to that of the super elites. We gain much just by
actually knowing how the world works. They seek to game us, we
see this and don't play at all. We do our own thing.
We form communities within the social commons, using our
incredible counter-force in the synergy of our own distributed wisdom.
We think globally (understand how the world actually works) and
act locally. We take our Blessed Unrest (our waking up to social
reality) and use the already developing Civil Society and Wise Earth
culture to be smarter and wiser than the elites who seek to rule.
We confound their seeking power and wealth (dominion over), with our ability to work with each other (communion with). They fight and compete, we cooperate.
They tie themselves to social structures that can't do anything
but get more and more rigid and then die. We create living
social forms, full of life and love. We make peace and
love, not war. The meek will inherit the earth.*
Wake up. Declare victory, and go find some local
politics to get involved in. Participate! Trust the
distributed wisdom and the principle of synergy. Think globally, act
locally. And, have fun doing it. Dance, sing, and create
art. Work and play together.
finis
*[Of course, this essay doesn't answer a lot of
questions. If you want a more general examination of some of the
spiritual secrets
of the world, read my the Way of
the Fool,
and
New Wine. For more on politics, read Uncommon Sense
as well as On the
Nature of Public Life.]